This blog will serve as a credible source of accurate and timely information regarding the Department. In addition, interact with Superintendent Jody P. Weis; he will post his thoughts, ideas and comments regularly to this blog. Most importantly, YOU, as Department members can join in the discussion and share your perspective.

Superintendent's Q & A: Open Post

Mar 15, 2010 by SUPERINTENDENT

In order to streamline my responses to your questions, comments, suggestions, etc., I have added "Superintendent's Q & A" as an open post that will remain on the blog indefinitely. You can easily access this open post at all times on the right hand side of the blog by clicking the button under interact, titled "Superintendent's Q & A". I will respond as soon as possible to your legitimate issues.

As always, stay safe.


Comments:

Dear Supt:

I am writing to you for clarification regarding whether PPOs, who have completed 1 year of service, but are still on probation have the ability to go to school. Some members of Academy staff have informed PPOs the not eligible to go to school until the complete the 1.5 year probationary period. Members of the FOP have informed the PPOs the may go to school after 1 year given tuition reimbursement is granted after one year of service per the contract.

Thanks.

Posted on March 15, 2010 at 01:42 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I do not know the contractual rights to the level you seek clarification off the top of my head.  I suggest you look these up.  I will ask the HR department to send out clarification on this topic. JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 10:01 AM CDT #


I was at the meeting last year where you said the dept. would hire 425-475 po's that yr,that didn't happen,now this yr we have only hired 86 recruits,I know the economy is an issues,the city and the state have problems,I also know we are down 2000 po's,and if you believe what you read the dept. will not hire any more this yr,now my question is this,we have a 100-200 people retiring in april,being that they are already in the budget at salaries averaging $70,000,why isen't the dept. hiring 100 or so recruits at a salary of $45,000?

Posted on March 15, 2010 at 07:49 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

First, we are not down 2000 police officers.  As of Friday, we were down 711 officers, or approximately 5.3 percent.  If we hire no one for the remainder of the year, our projected vacancies do not exceed 10 percent.  We are workikng everyday to develop a hiring plan for this year, and the next.  Your point is a viable argument that we are incorporating into our various proposals.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:51 AM CDT #


A few months back you mentioned the deep discounted prices that the department gets on the vehicles that they purchase. I was wondering if the department can try to set up a program with whoever we purchase the vehicles from to offer the same discounts to the department's employees. A vehicle purchase is often the second largest purchase a person makes after their house. This would be a great way to add a nice benefit without having any cost to the city.



Posted on March 15, 2010 at 10:03 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Any discounts the department receives are usually attributed to volume for a particular model, such as Crown Vics, or the police package Tahoes.  It is not possible to have these prices set for the multitude of models that folks would want for their POVs.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:46 AM CDT #


Last month you mentioned that the Forensic Unit gave an exam in 2004 which was graded and posted the same day the exam was given. But what someone failed to mention was that after the test was graded and posted the first time they found that a few of the questions we poorly worded. Therefore, they had to throw out the questions and re-grade the test a second time. The correct scores were then posted a couple of days later. This just about shuffled everyone's rank order around. This being said it is true that the Officers taking these exams deserve to get their results in a more expeditious manner but the department should take there time and insure the results which are given out are accurate. This only created a minor headache with 740 officers taking the test. Imagine the problems this would cause if this happened with a Sergeants or Detectives exam, tests Officer are typically more passionate about.

Posted on March 15, 2010 at 10:18 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We will ensure that all future promotional exams are without disparate impact, are properly vetted, and are without any of the aforementioned problems.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:44 AM CDT #


Any chance the treadmills in the HQ gym will be repaired or replaced? Currenlty, only 3 of the 7 are working. There is always demand for the 3 that are operational. Any information you can provide is much appreciated. Thank you!

Posted on March 16, 2010 at 08:47 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have directed the BAS to fix these.  It makes no sense having broken equipment collecting dust.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:42 AM CDT #


Superintendent,
Just a thought. As a district tactical sergeant, I feel that it is important having an open line of communication with all levels of the department. As you know, the tact teams deal with all types of street level crime, but mostly the tact team's activity centers around illegal narcotics and gang crimes. Much of this criminal activity, especially crimes involving street gangs, carries over district boundaries and in many cases with some street gangs the crimes are citywide. My question is this: the district tactical teams in many cases are the first lines of defense and interaction with the street gangs, why aren't the district tactical team sergeants equipped with Blackberry devices to immediately share and especially receive vital information? The area gang team sergeants have them, the narcotic team sergeants have them, the gun team sergeants have them, why are the tactical team sergeants the last to find out about vital citywide information that may give their tactical officer's the upper hand when dealing with street level crimes? Also, the Blackberries are a great tool for sergeants sharing information on a citywide level. If I am working as a tactical sergeant in the 011th District and a gang homicide occurs in the 015th district, I may not hear about it for quite some time since 011 and 015 don't share the same zone. In a department of Blackberries, seventy-five more devices doesn't seem like a big deal if it opens even more levels of communication at the district level. Thank you for your time.

Posted on March 16, 2010 at 10:44 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We recently expamded the BB program to the Tact LTs.  The price of these devices continue to come down.  I will see if this is financially feasible.  It certainly makes sense.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:41 AM CDT #


I have a question for you in regards to all the protest rallies we have to deal with. Why can someone look into all the masked people who attend. I would think if the protest leaders have to apply for a permit from the city for the event which gives them access to the streets and limits the area that the protest can go why can't it be written into the permit that the organizers have to make sure none of the protesters are masked? could make it that if the organizers do not comply with the order future permits will not be issued to that organization

Posted on March 16, 2010 at 12:01 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will have this question explored. JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:39 AM CDT #


I am again commending you for the much anticipated and needed Taser rollout. As I stated in a previous post I have been trained and certified in the use of a Taser. I have just finished reading General Order 07-01 XIV I. which states: "Department members who have been trained in the use of the Taser device will request the issuance of the Taser and will be REQUIRED to carry the Taser". Well, as I stated earlier, I walked into my W/C's office and requested a Taser as the order stated and was denied. I was clearly looking at approximately 9 available Tasers and have asked numerous times since and have been denied each time. So I'll say it again, this is a great less than lethal weapon and will most likely prevent officer injuries yet I am not being allowed to sign the weapon out. This appears to be a clear violation by the Captain of the General Order. One step forward...two steps back...morale killer again!

Posted on March 17, 2010 at 12:35 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Unacceptable!  I directed Chief Williams to put out a directive ordering the W/C's to issue Tasers if the PO is certified and a Taser is available.  Let me know if this is not happening.  We are also strengthening the order to remove any ambiguity in its intent.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:38 AM CDT #


Will the St. Jude's March be held on Michigan Avenue this year? You addressed this issue in an October 2009 Blog 501 Post. At that time, you stated alternating between Michigan Avenue and Gold Star Park was a good idea.

Posted on March 17, 2010 at 04:16 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

My understanding is that the Gold Star families prefer that the parade be held in and around the memorial.  Out of repsect for them, this is where the parade will be.  I will continue to explore the Michigan Avenue venue as an option for future parades.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:36 AM CDT #


Superintendent, Any chance we could get the general orders on the PDT? It would really help in the field, when a question arises we could look up the correct answer.

Posted on March 17, 2010 at 08:33 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are in the process of a comprehensive review of all of our orders.  This will be completed in September.  I will ensure those addressing the PDT are updated and included.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:33 AM CDT #


I have continued to periodically read this blog for information, and i'm very troubled at what i continue to read. For over a year we have heard that there will be promotions. First, the pax 501 listing the possible promotions,last year. Then this year your responses have been that you beleive there will be promtions,now i read we won't have promotions because of the city revenue being down. will we or won't we have any promotions? we know officers are short, there are many watches where
there is one sergeant for the whole watch. You were brought in to address
the corruption issues of the police department, one of the key issues of the Special Operations Scandal was the lack of supervison, i know i was there. i would think street level supervison would be paramount under your admistration. i understand the budget crunch but some watches are understaffed. This department never seems to have a shortage of upper command staff promotions. This department is too top heavy,if you want to be a reformer and have your adminstration billed as a success. i beleive you need to get patrol officers and lower level managemet on the street, and eliminate many of these upper command jobs.

Posted on March 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The city revenues are down; that is a fact.  Public safety has not been told we will not promote; however, all promotions must be supported by clear evidence that efficiencies and effectiveness will be improved.  The days of saying we have 100 vacancies, so we want to promote 100 are over.  We are working on this daily, and I am hopeful that we will be able to promote serveral positions in the near future.  But, there is no time frame on this.  When I hear, you will hear.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:32 AM CDT #


First I would like to thank you for issuing the Officers Legal Handbook, I think it is a wonderful tool. Is it true that only full duty officers were given the Officers Legal Handbook? If this is true, can you help us understand why this is being done. There is a lot of information that is useful to all officers regardless of duty status, for instance the section on the rights of the accused, use of force, and arrest. Thank you.

Posted on March 18, 2010 at 03:05 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'm glad you liked this.  We have printed more copies so that everyone will be able to have one.  It's an easy reference guide that needs to be with all of the officers.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:28 AM CDT #


Dear Superintendent,

Sir for the love of god don't exclude your Cadets from applying this time around. These kids invested enough time to be considered veterans by now. They deserve a shot to be the real police. Let them apply at 21 like we do for military.
Guaranteed they are going to be 25+ by the time they are hired anyway. ONLY you can make that policy happen.


Posted on March 19, 2010 at 02:49 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The application process is still under consideration.  I will discuss the cadet issue with the HR department and see what options are available.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:24 AM CDT #


I am a frequent user of a ticket printer. It is a very handy device for people who do a lot of traffic. one of the problems I run into is that the software does not have an expanded option for printing tickets. If the paper roll runs out in the middle of printing i.e. 4 tickets ( cuts out on the forth one), upon installing new roll the program does not have reprint option for a specific ticket. Basically i have to waste more fancy ticket paper to get my last ticket. If there is an update coming, can somebody fix that? If there is somebody in academy that deals with this issue, i would be glad to provide positive/negative feedback regarding the printer software. pc0v230.

Posted on March 19, 2010 at 08:17 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  I will have ISD review this matter.  JW



Posted on March 21, 2010 at 09:23 AM CDT #


Some positives first: patrol carbine program, taser program, new vehicles, modernized equipment and uniform changes.

Now the negative: Leadership, Leadership, Leadership. Morale is low amongst many of the Police Officers and Detectives because they feel they have leaders who 1)Have never DONE THE JOB OF POLICE OFFICER OR DETECTIVE; 2)If they ever were the police, it was for about 2 years at the beginning of their career, with the rest spent in "special" units; 3)Lack respect for their "troops"; 4)Have personal or moral issues that, in any other organization, would preclude them from holding a job, much less a leadership position; 5)Are more interested in moving on to the next promotion than in actually doing their job and taking care of their troops. The list could go on and on, but the basic point is that in the Army, leadership is summed up with the sayings, "Be, Know, Do," and "Take Care of the Troops." Sadly, most of our "leaders" do not live up to this standard, and our Officers deserve much better.

Address the issue of Leadership in this department, and you will raise morale instantly.

Lastly, YOU should be making decisions on who is a leader on this department. Not the Mayor, not the City Council, and DEFINITELY, not the community or church leaders. YOU are the Superintendent. YOU are the decider.

Posted on March 20, 2010 at 02:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

First, 70% of the leadership positions are made by test scores; that's the way it is.  Number two, we are more focused on leadership than ever before.  We have had scores of leadership seminars, we are building the leadership academy, and we will be insitituting performance evaluations for all ranks, to ensure everyone is held accountable.  Not all laders are equal, but treating people consistently, fairly, and with respect should be consistent with everyone who wears a white shirt.  And as for selection of leaders, since I was sworn in, there has been one recommendation made to me as to who I should promote, and I did not promote that person.  At the end of the day, I have to live by these decisions.  So, any promotions I have made have been my decision, and mine alone.  Of course I seek out advice from executive management, but the final decision is mine.  JW



Posted on March 24, 2010 at 08:34 AM CDT #


Sir, As a P.O. that works in area 2 I observe a large number of vehicles with Indiana temp registration permits. I know that some are obviously false based on a misspelling (the word delivery is spelled deliverly). Is there any way to get a training bulletin on this issue. It would be nice to impound some of these cars for false TRP but there are many I am unsure of. I also see a large number of Wisconsin temp plates but it appears Indiana has so many versions of false plates. If we had training in this area I believe it would be helpful for a lot of officers. I thank you for your consideration.

Posted on March 20, 2010 at 03:26 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Excellent point.  I will pass this on to the BOP and Training.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on March 24, 2010 at 08:26 AM CDT #


Recently there was an application for Sgts to apply to the JTTF. The application stated that there would be an assessment exercise. No one that I know who has applied has heard about an assessment exercise or whether someone has been picked for this assignment. I understand if it isn't me but it would be more responsible to let me know that a decision has been made. Thanks for your time.

Posted on March 21, 2010 at 10:22 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'll ask the JTTF to announce their selection.  JW



Posted on March 24, 2010 at 08:25 AM CDT #


Dear Superintendant Weis, 22 Mar 2010

Recently the detectives of all the areas were reminded of the excessive amount of overtime which was generated as a result of either court appearances or extension of tours. A notification to appear in court is made by either the State's Attorney's Office, Public Defender's Office or Corporation Council and is beyond an officer's control. Also, the need to extend one's tour in order to conduct a proper investigation should not be looked at in terms of dollars and cents.
It appears that once again department members who are assigned Title Code D2 and D2A have been excluded from participating in another overtime initiative. These members have previously been excluded from working the Safe Students and Operation Safe City Programs and are now being excluded from the Transit Orientated Screening of Passengers by Observational Techniques (TOSPOT) Program. Members were previously informed the reason for their exclusion was due to budgetary considerations.
The reason for the exclusion is a sound one and the reason for wanting only those officers whose Title Code is 9161 is understood. But many officers/detectives would like to participate in these programs and perhaps it can be opened to them at the Title Code 9161 pay rate. This may be one possible solution to a decrease in the overall overtime.
I look forward to your response.




Det. Joseph Aguirre #20510
Area One Detective Division



Posted on March 22, 2010 at 02:07 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The detective division was spending OT at a rate that far exceeded it's budget. I directed the chief to institute procedures that would ensure OT was monitored and used appropriately.  I do not want to return to the point where no OT was authorized.  So, we need to ensure we are authprizing it properly.  As for the Safe City and Student program, that has been addressed scores of times.  JW



Posted on March 24, 2010 at 08:22 AM CDT #


Is there anything that can be done about the AIRA reports in the narrative section. Currently the system places the wording all in upper case. This is very difficult to read when you have a long narration. I thought all reports were done in lower caps and only last names were capitalized for ease of reading. This is the way I was tought going through the academy. I do not remmeber seeing an order that now states reports are to be capitalized. Is there a way the IT people may be able to correct this and let the reports be writen the way they are suppose to be. I'm sure the Detective Department would also agree the reports are easier to read in lower case.

Posted on March 22, 2010 at 02:57 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We can look into this.  Doesn't seem like too difficult.  Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on March 24, 2010 at 08:18 AM CDT #


Dear Superintendent, I want to thank you for having the Blog 501 I think it's a great way for all Department members to share ideas with you to make the department a better place. I visit the blog alot and I have noticed that some members ideas have been implemented. So I was wondering if some of the ideas weren't being passed as your own and that some sort of credit was given to the members who came up with them.




Posted on March 22, 2010 at 04:58 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I give credit to the blog; I can't give credit to individuals since their comments are anonymous.  JW



Posted on March 24, 2010 at 08:17 AM CDT #


I am a Detective who does not have enough time to work special emplyment at the airport or CHA north and south. My question is what is the reasoning behind not allowing Detectives to work all the special employment opportunities that Police Officers who are not Detectives are able to? I'm sure most detectives would accept regular D-2 pay to be able to work all special employment.

Posted on March 23, 2010 at 04:07 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We have covered this many times.  Lets try some new topics.  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:42 PM CDT #


Regarding the first comment by a PPO about education benefits.
Appendix P (p. 126 in the book) of the current contract shows all of the benefits available to PPO's that have completed 12 months of service.
The educational reimbursement is part of that appendix.
PPO's are afforded the same benefits as all other PO's after 12 months on the job. They are only at will employee's for the additional 6 months.


Posted on March 24, 2010 at 09:49 AM CDT #


Dear Superintendent ... I have a question regarding not being able to be promoted to the rank of Sergeant after sustaining a "permanent light duty status" injury on duty. Are there, or will there be any changes in the G.O.'s allowing qualified Officers to be promoted even though they are in this status? After many years on the job, a serious injury has placed me in this category, and unable to ever be promoted. Any thoughts on this matter?

Posted on March 24, 2010 at 02:42 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The "light duty" status is a complex issue that does not lend itself to an informal medium such as this blog.  The policies and rules that govern this are usually challenged in court, so it would be best to avoid offering an opinion on this subject.  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:46 PM CDT #


Superintendent,

As a beat officer who frequently deals with missing person reports for a group home on the beat, I was thinking how much time we spend at these homes on a daily basis. Occassionally, we are called three times on our watch alone to do the missing reports, who knows if any other officers on the watch go there too. My question is since these are usually ward of the state juveniles that usually return by the end of the day or next, can these reports be done by 311. That way we free up a car from dealing with these reports and attend to another 911 call. Its gets pretty crazy during the summer, when these kids don't want to come home.

Posted on March 24, 2010 at 09:31 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This is certainly worth exploring.  We respond to nearly twice the national average of 911 calls.  It would be beneficial to look into seeing what calls could be handled by some form of alternative response.  We have initiated this process, but there is much to do.  Thank you for the suggestion.  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:52 PM CDT #


Sir
Here is a link from the LAPD webpage:
http://www.lapdonline.org/lapdsports/content_basic_view/41014
I think this would be a good idea to promote our athletic teams as well as their events and to encourage Department members to stay active. I believe we have Football, Hockey, Soccer, Baseball, and the runners club.

Posted on March 24, 2010 at 10:49 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Good idea.  I will ask ISD to see if we can offer something similar.  Thank you!  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:49 PM CDT #


Regarding the comment on reducing Detective overtime. What about a pilot 12 hour day schedule for Detectives?

Posted on March 25, 2010 at 01:25 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have asked the Deputy Superintendent to discuss creative alternatives to assist with OT with his Chief.  I am always open to new and creative options to make the department more effective and efficient.  I will pass this on to both Steve and Tom for their consideration/evaluation.  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:48 PM CDT #


Earlier in the week you posted: "The detective division was spending OT at a rate that far exceeded it's budget. I directed the chief to institute procedures that would ensure OT was monitored and used appropriately."

Such a statement implies OT was being used improperly. Solving a homicide or aggravated criminal sexual assault, or other serious crimes, cannot be done in just a few hours. Many times a crime scene is not processed for many hours, especially in a homicide. Then there are witnesses to interview or locate, material to prepare for the ASA and reports to type before we can leave.

All of this must be done in a direct manner so a suspect can be charged and brought before a judge (or duty judge) within a 48-hour period. Few people want to continously work around the clock, and be away from our families, but it is done because that is our job.

To exclude detectives from certain programs because they do their job, and make the mayor and police brass look good when crimes are solved, is just plain crazy. It punishes the workers.

Detective Thomas M. Downes
Area 2 Detective Division

Posted on March 25, 2010 at 02:53 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not sure how putting protocols in place to ensure fiscal responsibilty implies some nefarious intent on anyone's part.  We were way over budget; didn't want to return to the days of no overtime, period.  JW 



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:41 PM CDT #


Can you please check when Interactive Health Systems will be conducting the health screenings. In the past they have come out to various districts about twice a year. This is extremely important for our members. Last year they were out in April. I have yet to see anything posted on this.

Also could you please verfiy the college credits for TARA. Noone seems to know how or where to get them.

Posted on March 25, 2010 at 09:09 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I suggest you call the Human Resources Department; they should have answers for you.  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:37 PM CDT #


Please address the vulnerability that department members face with the public having access to full names that can be tracked for free on numerous online websites that instantly reveal home address from public records (People with common first and last names do not face this issue at the same level as others who have unique names). I do not need to go into detail what the concern is and realize that this is a problem that probably also needs to be addressed by legislation, but that will probably take an excessive amount of time. Would you please address this more immediately for ALL of us?


Posted on March 25, 2010 at 01:36 PM CDT #


First time that I really read this blog site. Some very good ideas and some very interesting requests and responses. The idea of wearing polo shirts is not a good idea, this will create a very unprofessional image and a continued lack of respect for the hardest working division in the police department, the Patrol Division.

Posted on March 25, 2010 at 01:39 PM CDT #


Please address the vulnerability that department members face with the public having access to full names that can be tracked for free on numerous online websites that instantly reveal home address from public records (People with common first and last names do not face this issue at the same level as others who have unique names). I do not need to go into detail what the concern is and realize that this is a problem that probably also needs to be addressed by legislation, but that will probably take an excessive amount of time. Would you please address this more immediately for ALL of us?


Posted on March 25, 2010 at 01:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The Internet makes everyone vunerable to those that want to learn about our addresses, property, and anything that is a public record, all of which can be easily searched from a computer.  I will have the ISD put out a reminder as to the vunerabilities that we all face, and if there are any solutions to prevent this.  The problem is that there are so many public source documents, it is very difficult to filter these from the public domain.  JW



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 03:35 PM CDT #


I am an evidence technician. Since being promoted to an E.T. I have worked CTA special employment to keep my skills up as a police officer. During off duty I have learned how to use the automated arrest and reporting systems. My activity record will show that I have had arrests on a monthly basis since being promoted. Wages from CTA special employment have been several thousand dollars a year and have helped my family. I use the CTA when I am with my family and have to tesify in the domestic and traffic courts.

Yesterday, I learned that there was CTA training course limited to police officers (Pay Code 9161) only. The course was through TARA and materials offered would help officer (again pay code 9161 only) identify terrorists on the CTA. After completing the course officers (again pay code 9161 only) would earn time and half while working CTA special employment.

I feel that limiting this course to pay code 9161 is unsafe, unfair, and unwise. It will be unsafe because I will not have this valuable training (placing my partners and self at risk) while working CTA speical employment. It will be unfair because I will earn less than those code 9161 (so much for a promotion) while working CTA special employment. It would be unwise because we are police officers 24/7 even when we are not work but on the CTA with our families or going to court.

Posted on March 26, 2010 at 01:16 AM CDT #


Superintendent,

With such shortage of manpower, and consequently, shortage of openings throughout districts for bidding, why not allow for voluntary details to those districts that seem to be the only ones on the list every period?
That is to say, supposing one doesn't want to commit for the entire year, perhaps a 1 to 3 month/period deployment would alleviate some of the need in those districts allowing for permanent openings in more sought after units to become available to those who volunteered in areas of need?

Also, why not show the department's commitment to health and fitness goals by making the annual power test a prerequisite or at least a first qualifier for assignments like the lakefront bicycle detail or even overtime initiatives with bids allowing for seniority of applicants after first preference for those who completed the annual fitness test?

Lastly, activity by way of arrests and traffic citations (movers) seems to be of continued concern in many districts insofar as bosses gripe about "being down." How about a revised DUI enforcement class/in-service that would offer patrolmen and woman a chance to improve their level of confidence and proficiency in order to improve the department's standing considering the recent scrutiny and resulting concerns. It would seem a worthy investment that would yield a win/win when one considers that DUI enforcement could become a publicized campaign few, if any, would argue against and at the same time increase arrests, impounds, citations, and certainly deter the frequency of occurrence.
Dare I humbly suggest this is one of the few areas many officers would readily admit that a lack of confidence inhibits their otherwise aggressive willingness to attack any crime were it not for a chance to re-educate themselves in guided fashion by way of knowledgeable instruction not found at the district level? (This might also contribute to an uncharacteristic hesitation on the part of some officers where investigating an off-duty officer's alleged involvement is concerned, perhaps more so than any perceived collusion).


Posted on March 27, 2010 at 12:26 AM CDT #


Sir: I was wondering if the Dept. was making any headway into the call-taking process and job assignments to PO's in the field. Many Many jobs that should be handled by 3-1-1 are being dispatched to the field officers. For instance, driveable traffic crashes and paper jobs. We know the Department is short everywhere, but when officers are down on paper jobs and a serious call comes out, this poses a danger to the other officers out there. No cars are available because the dispatchers have us tied up on jobs that 3-1-1 or district desks could and should be doing. Nobody should have to respond to a priority call alone. Many jobs should be put out there for informational purposes, such as reckless drivers. We are actually held down on these jobs knowing that by the time we travel to the location, the car will definitely not be there. It's a waste of time. It gets to a point where a Sgt is assigned to a domestic because no cars are available for assignment and no cars available to back-up the Sgt. That's dangerous.
Maybe someone should be informing the zone on each watch to send the no injury/driveable accidents into the station for their reports and send the paper jobs to 3-1-1. Maybe Sgts should be given the authority remind dispatch to transfer these calls to the appropriate place ... desk or 3-1-1; because it's not happening out there.
Maybe that's a start to lifting the load and freeing up officers so when "it hits the fan" we're up and available.

Posted on March 28, 2010 at 01:47 PM CDT #


SIR - WHAT IS THE LATEST UPDATE ON REBALANCING WORKLOAD? I RECALL A PRIOR MENTION OF AN OUTSIDE FIRM ANALYZING WAYS TO GET MORE PATROL CARS PROWLING IN 004,006,008 AND OTHER DISTRICTS IN FREQUENT BACKLOG SITUATIONS.

Posted on March 28, 2010 at 08:17 PM CDT #


"The detective division was spending overtime at a rate that far exceeded its budget. I directed the chief to institue procedures that would ensure OT was monitored and used appropriately." OT has been drastically reduced since the implementation of the ten hour day in Area Two. Morale has been drastically increased. Clearance rates rates have increased. Despite all this we are still hearing rumors that the ten hour day is being taken away. Can you direct the Chief to take notice of an already implemented procedure that is in fact reducing overtime and ironically increasing morale?

Posted on March 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Have done that, and your points are well made.  JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 03:07 PM CDT #


Superintendent, I agree that we should all stay vigilant and commend you for allowing our specialized units to receive training and dress the part. They needed that. Thanks again for the carbines and the ability for us patrol officers to have these at the ready. While I am not in a specialized unit I do not allow myself to fall behind on training, always at a great expense. With that being said, my question would be towards a review of our uniforms and equipment. I have bought several items that would definitively put me at an advantage over active shooters but cannot wear these items because of the uniform constraints of our dept. I have ballistic plates which as you know are expensive but the present vest configurations are not sturdy enough to hold them. Several vests allow expansion for med packs, and multiple magazines. Retention holsters for tasers can also be placed on said vest. The gun belt can only hold so much. The M4 platform needs a new configuration to our old uniforms. I believe most of the dept would agree. Is it at all possible to remedy this situation? If an active shooter enters a school I will be there long before any other unit is able to respond. Please review the uniforms to allow me to make it home at the end of said engagement. I have served this dept for 15 years and it is now that we need to review and fix the gaps in our armor. With all the intel on active shooters, terrorist, police shootings, and threats world wide, should'nt we take a stand and dress for the show? We need to be equiped for any confrontation. The beat officer is the heart of any department. let us reflect a definitive blue line that only the foolish would dare cross. I hope in making our dept the best in the world you would consider this.



Posted on March 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Great post, great ideas.  I will put the research group on this right away.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 01:59 PM CDT #


Almost every night on zone 6 some car is asking on the air "can someone with a working PDT meet me on my stop",working PDT?Its my understanding every beat car and every tac car should have a working PDT,I'm sure every dist. goes through this,why is that we have to go through this,yes things break but this had been going on for a while now,why can't we have the tools to do our job?It will only benefit this dept. if we had the right tools to do our job,because right now-for the most part,we do not.

Posted on March 29, 2010 at 01:43 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Please, please, please, let us know about this as soon as there is an issue.  Ted O'Keefe wants to be told so he can ensure you have the equipment (PDTs)  to do your jobs.  JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 01:57 PM CDT #


Sir,
This is the first time I have commented on this blog or any other blog for that matter. I feel it is important that you know there are plenty of us troops who believe you are doing an outstanding job! I love my job and find very little to complain about! Well, enough of that. With the recent arrests involving domestic terrorist interested in targeting the police, I wanted to know if additional security plans are being made for the St Jude march, Run to Remember and future Dept. Funurals?


Posted on March 29, 2010 at 04:45 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for visiting.  We coordinate with all Intel sources (FBI, ISP, and National/International Intelligence Agencies) and we do a threat assessment for all of the above events. JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 01:56 PM CDT #


can we get more dates for the segway training? first day announced, and it's full.

Posted on March 29, 2010 at 06:03 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Absolutely.  We will offer this as much as we can.  JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 01:53 PM CDT #


We have covered this many times. Lets try some new topics. JW

As for the Safe City and Student program, that has been addressed scores of times. JW
*************
*************
Your comments are almost pompous!!!! Maybe if you or your command staff had the respect of the men and women you lead you would OBVIUOUSLY understand that this is an issue that affects the police officers (title code 9161) and Detectives (Title Code 9165) that work day in and day out for this city but yet are denied overtime positions because they are assigned to the Bureau of Investigative Services. You have police officers in this Bureau that are exempt from working these positions merely because they are assigned to the Bureau of Investigative Services.

You keep saying that the above issues have been addressed, but OBVIOUSLY if the MEN & WOMEN (You know your employees) are continuously complaining about the working conditions and benefits, maybe the complaints have merit. A knowledgeable, well informed and well rounded supervisor in touch with his employees would UNDERSTAND THIS and make corrective actions to fix this instead of the above sarcastic comments.


Posted on March 29, 2010 at 08:05 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Sometimes people do not want to hear the truth.  We have addressed these issues numerous times, both on this blog site and through departmental notifications.  There is a chain of command that everyone should follow, and that does not begin with me. I believe there is a certain degree of individual responsibility for folks to research an answer - that's what I have to do, and I don't see where my time is any more, or less, valuable then yours.  I will forward your concerns, again to DS Steve Peterson.  I would suggest that if you are unhappy as a PO in the BIS, DS Dugan has a home for you in the BOP.  JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 01:49 PM CDT #


Not sure how putting protocols in place to ensure fiscal responsibilty implies some nefarious intent on anyone's part. We were way over budget; didn't want to return to the days of no overtime, period. JW

.

Posted on March 30, 2010 at 02:36 AM CDT #


I was wondering about the status of the Police Cadet Program. I am Hearing that Human Resources is attempting to disband the program and that current cadets would just be out of luck which seems pretty unfair. This Department is in need of good police officers and the intent of this program was to assist qualified young men and women in attaining their goal while serving the department in a limited capacity, which many of them have done. I am hoping that this is just another rumor.

Posted on March 31, 2010 at 12:59 PM CDT #


Seeing as though the department is down a significant amount of manpower, why don't we utilize the hundreds of applications of officers that have left the job for some reason and are seeking to return. The city tells them that they can come back but Human Resources has the applications in a drawer. These are officers that were not granted Leaves of Absence but were forced to resign.. One example of this is people switching to the Chicago Fire Department. I believe that the last person allowed to return to work after resigning was a lieutenant who just recently retired as an Inspector. These people that want to return could be retrained in a very short period of time therefore alleviating some of our manpower shortage before summer.

Posted on March 31, 2010 at 11:43 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I agree with you 100 percent.  The issue is funding for the officers we hire.  Due to the city's fiscal position, we have not been allowed to hire a class YTD.  You make a valid point and this is something we can look into if, and when, we receive the green light to hire folks.  JW



Posted on April 03, 2010 at 01:42 PM CDT #


Sir,

According to Department Special Order 09-08:
Physical Fitness Center Lockers
The smaller lockers at the Headquarters Physical Fitness Center are to be used on a temporary basis not to exceed one (1) tour of duty at a time.

As of April 1, every single smaller locker is being used on a permanent basis. Is there any way you could open up these lockers so the rest of us who are unable to obtain a permanent locker on the 2nd floor can use them while we work out?

Thank you for you consideration.









Posted on April 01, 2010 at 09:49 AM CDT #


Sir,
Last year the detectives at Area One complained about the heat problem. Deputy Superintendent O'Keefe responded to our needs. He informed the supervisors that the problem would be rectified by 15 Feb 2010. Sir, it is now April. For the past week the temperature in the detective division averaged 87 degrees. On 31 Mar 2010 the temperature topped out at 90.8 degrees. It is 01 Apr at 1600 hours and the temperature is 84.3 degrees. Using your own word sir, this is UNACCEPTIBLE. The detectives here are hard working and we are not just whining about the heat. Could you please have this problem rectified.
Thank you.

Posted on April 01, 2010 at 04:12 PM CDT #


It's 92 degrees at 2045 hrs on Apr 1, 2010 in the offices at Area 1. I know that you addressed this earlier but it's hot and very uncomfortable. If you know anyone in the CPD who can get things done please, please call them and have them address this problem. Thanks from Area 1

Posted on April 01, 2010 at 08:48 PM CDT #


Several officers have commented on the difficulty for 1st Watch officers to attend the Superintendent's Speaker Series. While I understand there may be copyright issues with making a video of these presentations available for later use, would it be possible to have a real-time webcast of the sessions? It might be easier for officers to log in from home rather than actually driving to 35th St.

Posted on April 01, 2010 at 11:19 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Excellent point!  Let me see if that is possible.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:26 PM CDT #


Boss,

In a post in mid-March, you said we can track the status of a cr number via computer. How is that done?

Posted on April 02, 2010 at 09:48 AM CDT #


Just reading a previous comment about the Depatment being under staffed by 2000 P.O.'s and J.W. response was that we are only 700 under staff. There is no possible way that number is correct. 2000 seems more like the right number.

Posted on April 02, 2010 at 11:26 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Here are the facts - As of today, we have 734 vacancies.  We have a little over 1300 on medical, LD, and CD, but those numbers represent officers currently onboard. JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:24 PM CDT #


Sir, keep up the good work that I believe you are doing. I don't read this blog at all but I would like to say to you great job on everything you have implimented for us P.O's for our own safety. Yes moral can use a kick start, but just seeing you on the streets with us is a start.Let officers know there is overtime to be made in most situations, but guy's don't abuse it,and re-assure us that you are behind the men even though we make an honest mistake. keep up the good work boss......M.G

Posted on April 03, 2010 at 05:30 PM CDT #


WITH THE WARM WEATHER THIS PAST WEEK THE 9TH DISTRICT HAS BEEN VERY BUSY ESPECIALLY WITH MASS CROWDS HAVING ILLEGAL PARTIES ON SEVERAL BLOCKS. ON APRIL 1ST AT 4300 BLOCK OF WELLS WE HAD A CROWD OF APPROXIMATELY 200 PEOPLE WHO REFUSED TO DISPERSE AFTER NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS AND THE SAME HAD APPLIED THIS VERY EVENING AT THE 5400 BLOCK OF LAFLIN WITH A CROWD OF APPROXIMATELY 150 PEOPLE. WERE NOW LOSING 6-8 PO'S ON 3RD WATCH BACK TO BIKE PATROL BACK TO DAYS IN 009 AND THE LAKEFRONT, I'M SURE THE LESSER BUSY NORTH SIDE DISTRICTS CAN FREE UP AN EXTRA PO FOR THE BIKE PATROL. WE NEED THE MANPOWER IN THE BUSY DISTRICTS THIS IS THE PROPER MANAGEMENT DECISION, NOT TICKET WRITING 3-5 YEAR ON THE JOB PO'S IN BIKE PATROL AT THE LAKEFRONT OR IN THE DISTRICT. PLEASE SEND HELP!!!! GODD LUCK!

Posted on April 03, 2010 at 06:09 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are developing summer strategies that will hopefully address shortages in the busier districts.  I will forward your post to your commander so that he can explain the rationale behind his decision to move resources.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:21 PM CDT #


Sir,
Are you tired of hearing compaints about how life is tough at 35th/Michigan? I know it is difficult for people to bring their gym bags from their cubicle to the gym because there aren't any available lockers. Give me a break. Maybe they should go back to the street, I bet they would quickly forget that they dont have a gym locker to use.

Did this person forget the "chain of command"? Yeah, its real appropriate to have the Superintendent dealing with locker issues. HAHA


Posted on April 04, 2010 at 08:26 AM CDT #


Sir,
You always talk about how you want transparency within the Department, well then I hope you can answer this question for me. Back in Aug 2008 I was involved in an on-duty shooting that resulted in a HBT situation. My partner and I initiated the stop that resulted in an Offender shooting at me and my partner. We returned fire and chased the Offender where he was held up until SWAT arrived 1 1/2hrs later. During the exchange of fire between me and the Offender I was struck in the shoe with a .45cal round, never left the scene or received medical treatment. Later when SWAT arrived and set up, a SWAT Sgt was shot in the stomach. The round was stopped by his Level V vest and he was rather unscathed. We all received Medal of Valor's, but the SWAT Sgt also received the Blue Shield. My Blue Shield was denied because I was not seriously injured.
How can that be?? I was involved from the beginning, the bullet went through my shoe bruising the bottom of my foot and I get denied where a SGT gets hit in the vest, no injuries and he gets the Blue Shield?? Doesn't sound fair or transparent to me! To this day this still bothers me.


Posted on April 04, 2010 at 06:02 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Based upon your comments, I can certainly see your point.  There may have been other considerations which went into the selection; however, I do not know what those are off the top of my head.  I will have ASA Cuello reach out to you and see if she can better explain the rationale behind this award.  You deserve that.  Thank you for the question.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:16 PM CDT #


Sunday, Easter, the temperature in A-1 Detective Division is 92 degrees. We have posted this several times and have heard nothing. Please address this issue.

Posted on April 04, 2010 at 08:10 PM CDT #


HEAT IN Area 1

Posted on April 04, 2010 at 08:11 PM CDT #


Sir, I have attended and will continue to attend your town hall meetings. I asked at recent one about status of and use of personnel who attain the age of 63 and are forced to retire. Why not utilize these persons who want to stay on the job in a capacity that is fullfilling for the individual and provide a competent work force for the department to draw upon there experiences. PS when I was hired, I was told that there was a mandatory retirement age of 70, not the changed one to 63!

PC0t706, PO Fiorito 11624

Posted on April 05, 2010 at 01:50 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are looking at creative ways to address human resource issues within the CPD.  As I mentioned at the townhall meeting, we will look into this.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:09 PM CDT #


Could you please find out why Detectives are not able to print photos on-line of evidence in cases that they are assigned to? I think it would be a helpful tool and would save time

Posted on April 05, 2010 at 01:47 PM CDT #


Thanks so much for ensuring the additional treadmills at headquarters became operational. Would it be possible to obtain some kettle bells for headquarters like they have at the Academy?? Thanks!

Posted on April 05, 2010 at 02:21 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

While I commend you for you're interest in KB's, I believe that we will have to stick with the more traditional dumbells and barbells.  Money is tight, and I know you can still get a great workout using the more traditional weights.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:05 PM CDT #


Thank you very much for the air conditioners! Area One


Posted on April 05, 2010 at 06:21 PM CDT #


I know money is tight but I have noticed our system of securing blue inventory bags containing evidence is not secure. Often, it is just placed in a large canvas bag or just left on a shelf for the ERPS person to pick up the following day. Can money be found that will install a drop box, or at least a large locker?

Posted on April 06, 2010 at 04:21 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have directed DS Peterson to look into this.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:03 PM CDT #


I want to know what is being done to schedule Taser classes for supervisors (sergeants and Lieutenants) who have not been able to get in a class to complete training necessary to carry a Taser. Every time a small class comes up it fills so quickly its hard to get in. Plenty of effort is being placed on patrol officers completing the training, but it is the supervisors who have to review the TRRs. Is there anything you can do to get some supervisors classes scheduled. I have been told that supervisors cannot attend the patrol officers classes, which I believe is a resource that could be made available.

Posted on April 06, 2010 at 09:42 PM CDT #


Thank you for opening up Mass Transit TARA training and opportunities to other officers.

Posted on April 07, 2010 at 04:38 AM CDT #


Can you please check when Interactive Health Systems will be conducting the health screenings. In the past they have come out to various districts about twice a year. This is extremely important for our members. Last year they were out in April. I have yet to see anything posted on this.

Also could you please verfiy the college credits for TARA. Noone seems to know how or where to get them.

Posted on March 25, 2010 at 09:09 AM CDT #

Superintendent's Response
I suggest you call the Human Resources Department; they should have answers for you. JW

I HAVE TRIED THOSE ROUTES AND STILL NOONE CAN GIVE AN ANSWER

Posted on April 07, 2010 at 10:17 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I don't know you're name, so it's difficult to have the folks reach out to you.  I will forward your post to DS O'Keefe; please work with him to resolve you're matter.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 05:57 PM CDT #


I have a question regarding weapons available for off duty carry. I am a petite female 503/120lbs and find it difficult to conceal the weapons currently authorized by the department to register. The small glock is bulky and clearly visible in civilian dress. I am in a situation where I have testified to put many criminals in prison for varying lengths of time. They stared at me on the witness stand and I can only assume they would recognize me upon their release. I am also the mother of a small child that I take everywhere and have a responsibility to safeguard him from my career choice. This being said, I would like the opportunity to carry a small .38 caliber pistol. I would like to see the current weapon restrictions being modified for your smaller framed officers.

Posted on April 08, 2010 at 04:37 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

In the very near future, I will approve the order that will allow for small frame pocket pistols that are smaller than the Glock 26/27.  I hope that will help you out.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 05:55 PM CDT #


Sir: I know it was mentioned in an earlier post regarding making Automated Directives accessible on the PDT's. We recently have begun to document Gang Intervention Probation Program status on our arrest reports. Is there a way that ISD can put a link on our PDT's so we can access this on the PDT's as well?
When we do a traffic or street stop, where an arrest isn't always warranted, we have no way of knowing if the subject is part of the GIPP and what the subjects conditions are.
If a subject is part of the GIPP and is with other gang members or in violation of curfew hours, they should be placed under arrest, but we don't have access to this information on the PDT's and are probably letting them go after filling out a contact card. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Posted on April 08, 2010 at 08:30 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Great question.  I will have ISD look into this and determine if this is possible.  JW



Posted on April 10, 2010 at 05:53 PM CDT #


Is there anyway to be able to search arrestees in the CLEAR system by RD# and IR#?
Right now you can search by name, beat,and cb#.

Posted on April 10, 2010 at 03:42 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are doing a total makeover of the CLEAR system to make it more user friendly.  Your requests will be covered in this process.  JW



Posted on April 23, 2010 at 05:52 PM CDT #


Is there any way the department can rid itself of the self-imposed 48 hour rule or at least modify it? One reason for the excessive overtime in the detective division is because of the time restraints placed on them. Having only 48 hours to get victims, witnesses, lineups, ASA's, and so forth together, approve charges, and get an offender in front of a judge is silly. The time frame is not reasonable for major cases. The goal is to send someone away for years. When you only have 48 hours, mistakes will be made (law suits) or offenders will be released back to the streets to do more crimes or disappear.

Posted on April 10, 2010 at 04:43 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Some of the policies and rules we establish are based upon court decisions.  And while we may not like them, those are the ground rules that we have to play by.  I will ask DS Peterson to explain why this is necessary so that you will have a greater understanding of the rationale behind this decision.  JW



Posted on April 23, 2010 at 06:02 PM CDT #


My partner and I recently submitted a request for a copy of in car camera video that would be indisputable evidence to convict the offender in traffic court. The request was denied saying it is up to the ASA to request video. I'm not sure what the policy is but if an officer requests a video to assist in court room testimony and it is denied, how can the argument be made that the cameras purpose is anything other than to document mistakes made by officers? In my experience no ASA will request a video for traffic court, but I believe if an officer brought video in for a specific cases, the video would be used.

Posted on April 10, 2010 at 06:33 PM CDT #


Thank you for your prompt response to my question reguarding "pocket pistols".

Posted on April 11, 2010 at 01:48 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Glad we could deliver - I'll take small victories all the time.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 03:00 PM CDT #


In the new Tahoe's there is a black plastic panel in the rear hatch that is probably covering wires, or it is there so the rear compartment looks clean and so loose items wont damage any wiring. But I noticed in my regular vehicle checks that all sorts of loose items can fall back there. Including items thrown from an offender. I was wondering if that panel can simply be replaced by a clear sheet of plexi-glass? At least we will be able to see if anything dangerous is back there.

Posted on April 11, 2010 at 02:19 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  This is what we need - feedback on issues that we can not know.  Well done.  I will forward this to the BAS to discuss with Fleet.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 02:59 PM CDT #


Now that officers will some be able to carry lights on their duty weapons who have completed the approved department training, and the tasers which we now carry have a light/laser dot sysytem, is there any thought being given to allowing officers to carry lasers, or laser/light systems on their duty weapons in the near futher.

Posted on April 11, 2010 at 01:54 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Unfortunately, no.  The reason is that if you have multiple lasers on a target, you can not distinguish which one is yours.  JW



Posted on April 23, 2010 at 05:48 PM CDT #


Officer safety and radio issue procedures.

Sir: Due to the recent changes in the way special employment details are assigned, I recently had the (very appreciated) opportunity to work two film details due to someone calling off at the last minute. On the first occasion, two weeks ago. I went into the 023 dist. and asked to sign out a radio, something I have done many times last year without a problem. On this particular morning, the officer that I encountered, informed me that because I wasn't assigned to that dist., I wasn't allowed to sign out a radio. That the Watch Cmdr. would never allow such a thing. She asked why did I choose her dist. out of 24 others, or my own Dist. to sign out a radio. I informed her that I live four blocks away and that it was convenient, also that I work in a unit, not a dist. and I can't sign out a radio on a weekend as no one is there to issue it. After about 5-10 mins of begging and mentioning I work at H.Q. and that a Sgt. assigned to 023 was a friend of mine, was I finally allowed to sign for a radio. On 10 April 10 @ approx. 0730., I was assigned to a film detail that required each officer to sign out a marked patrol car from the TRU unit, located in the old 007 dist. station. I signed out the vehicle no problem, but when I asked to sign for a radio, I was told that, that was not possible, that I should have signed one out from my dist. of assignment. I explained that my assignment to this detail was a last minute change and that no one was available in my unit to issue a radio, I was told "sorry, we can't give you one". I stated that as a uniformed PO, in a marked car, I should have a radio. I asked what should I do in the event of an emergency, and was told. "Use your cell phone". Well..... I got to the detail location with no problem. The day went well and everything was everything. But, on the way to check off, I encountered several sport bike riders in a group on the Ryan operating their bikes in a very dangerous and reckless manner. I couldn't call it in or get after them.....didn't have a radio. And my cell phone froze up, all I got was an hour glass. ( a common occurrence with Blackberrys ) I made it to 63rd and Stewart and came across a seriously drunk goof about to stumble into traffic. As I stopped to assist him, his buddies took him by the hand and under their care. All was well. But had things gone goofy, I had no radio to ask for help. Also, I could have unknowingly ventured into harms way at anytime due to no radio to warn me of what was going on around me. I think that for safety reasons, any on duty PO with a valid reason, should be able to sign out a radio ( if available) from any Dist. One never knows what they may run across.

Posted on April 12, 2010 at 10:14 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Makes total sense to me.  I will have DS Dugan address this through his command channels.  Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on April 23, 2010 at 05:51 PM CDT #


Contact cards, since they are a must for the everyday police officer, why is the automated system so unuser friendly. Having spoken with numerous officers about these problems, I am wondering if there is something that could be done to improve the system. These problems include: (1)time consumption for entering a single card using the current format, it takes twice as long as filling out a card (2) on all occasions, if you enter into the contact card screen, the format does not allow you to exit out, you cannot use other functions of Data Warehouse unless you shut off your computer and start new (3) what is the backup plan if the computers go down or you don't have a computer, there are no cards left to use. There maybe more problems, but the system is so very frustrating to attempt to use. Thank you for your time.


Posted on April 13, 2010 at 03:39 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The ISD is undergoing a total overhaul of its systems and should address your concerns when completed.  I will direct them to let everyone know the status of their initiative.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:37 AM CDT #


What happen to the "Basic Police Officer Leadership Course"?

Posted on April 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

It's moving along.  I will have the PM send out a status report.  Thank you for your interest.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:38 AM CDT #


Will there be any promotions this summer? Thanks.

Posted on April 14, 2010 at 12:33 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I hope so, but I am not sure that will happen.  I bring this up every time I am at City Hall, which is at least weekly.  The city's budget is a real challenge.  However, having adequte supervision in LE Operations is critical too.  I will keep pounding that rock; hopefully i can crack it sometime in the near future.



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 02:56 PM CDT #


I am about to start a 90 day leave of absence for a family emergency. The recent FOP newsletter states that after 30 days or more of leave, the department "cashes" you out (everything - Pdays, comp time, BFDs, Vdays). First of all I'd like to know where this is written. I didn't see it in the G.O. so I'm assuming it's in our contract. Our long expired contract. Turns out they also cash you out for the FMLA leave. So a woman returning to work with a newborn can't have any time off? This seems a bit unfair. I will be returning to work after only 90 days with absolutely no time available for me to use. I have two very young children and am concerned. What is most troubling is that there are plenty of officers out there who would use the medical or IOD rather than take a leave and I am beginning to understand why. It doesn't effect your time off, your seniority, or your unit of assignment. So why am I and other officers who are doing the right thing by taking an unpaid leave being penalized. It's almost as if the city is advocating medical abuse. Wouldn't it be make more sense to cash people out after a 6 month or year leave. Or possibly based on the reason for leave - a leave for other employment rather than a leave for family.

Posted on April 14, 2010 at 12:49 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

You are venturing into the legal arena, so I incorporated some help in trying to answer your question.  Hope this helps.  Here goes: 



A leave of absence is a benefit provided for under City Personnel guidelines and is distinct from FMLA which is governed by federal law.  FMLA is mandated, so the rules are developed and applied in accordance with the law.  The medical benefits on this job are fantastic, as you know, and officers are far better covered for injury, pregnancy and general illness than many others.  I am unclear as to your point on use of medical, but if it doesn't apply to your situation, as a Chicago Police Officer you are expected to do what is ethical and legal, it is what being a Chicago Police officers means, it is your duty and job.

  

In regards to LOA and the use of benefits, a leave of absence is not guaranteed.  City Personnel Rules control these decisions not the contract. The CPD can mandate that you use your benefit time, if it will cover your requested absence.  As you are aware, we are currently down police officers due to retirements.  In your absence, your position must still be filled, and it directly impacts the performance of your fellow officers, the use of their benefit time and the like.  However, the information you have is not correct.  Should you wish to discuss your situation in detail, please contract Director Ladner at Human Resources so that you can get the correct information on Leaves of Absences.





Posted on April 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM CDT #


I'M STARTING TO REALLY GET DESPONDENT ABOUT MY JOB, I'VE READ A RUMOR ON THAT OTHER BLOG , THAT SAYS YOU AND THE POLICY GROUP WILL BE THROWING OUT THE CURRENT SERGEANT'S LIST AND DETECTIVES LIST, AND REPLACING THEM WITH SOME NEW POLICES ON PROMOTIONS, SORT OF A DO OVER, IS THIS TRUE? I'M LOOKING TO YOU FOR ANSWERS. IM SO CLOSE ON THE CURRENT SGT'S LIST, I DON'T KNOW ANYONE OR HAVE CLOUT, I DESERVE MY PROMOTION I HAVE WORKED HARD AND CONTINUED TO PRODUCE GOOD ARREST NUMBERS FOR THE DEPARTMENT, ALL IN THE HOPES THAT I WAS GOING TO GET PROMOTED. I HEAR THESE THINGS, AND WITH THE LACK OF PROMOTIONS , MAKES ME BELEIVE THERE MAY BE SOME TRUTH TO THESE RUMORS. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS , I KNOW YOU HAVE IN THE PAST MANY TIMES.

Posted on April 14, 2010 at 05:25 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you so much for asking this question.  As usual, no truth whatsoever.  The lists will remain up for quite some time.  What I can not tell you is when promotions will come; that is an unknown at this time.  But I can tell you the list will remain currnet until a new test, and that won't happen for probably at least two years, based upon the number of folks promoted off of the current list.  You will be fine.  Further, while the policy group is often painted as the Great Satan, they have been instrumental in giving the department carbines, Speaker Series, Legal Handbook, Pocket Pistols, Lighted Weapons, new vests, this Blog, new analytic strategies, and much more.  For this, I think them, as should all of the officers in the department.  They have served you well, and they continue to work on many initiatives we hope to roll out in the near future.  JW



Posted on April 23, 2010 at 06:14 PM CDT #


Sir We all know how stressfull this job is and the negative effects constant stress can have on an individual. One of the biggest stress factors right now is the uncertainty of our future pension benefits. It is in the paper daily about public pensions being reduced or eliminated. What is your position and what have you and your staff done regarding this life changing issue?

Posted on April 15, 2010 at 08:48 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Pension benefits are outside of my control.  Suggest you speak to the pension board.  Sorry.  JW



Posted on April 23, 2010 at 06:16 PM CDT #


Sir,
I'm confused... I know there is a man power shortage in the districs so why does it take the patrol division so long to catch up with those who were limited duty and have been reinstated to full duty? I know of 1 young lady in the Alternate Response Sectiion (Unit 376)that was sent there because she was pregnant, the baby is now 10 months old and she still wears a recruit designator, don't ya think it's time for her to go learn how to be the police? When the patrol division was questioned about it they refused to answer the question, so this can only lead one to believe that they are the ones allow these people to stay in the Alternate Response Section (Unit 376). I can tell you that there are at least 3 others who are in a full duty status and some have been for years. lets get these patrolmen who are full duty back to the districts where they belong so that the fine CPD men and women can have the back up they need and get the time off they want.
Thank You for this blog.

Posted on April 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The LD position is a challenge for any large organization.  Medical evaluations must be determined by medical professionals.  This is an issue that we need to work with the union and try to tackle, but it is complex.  But, I appreciate you recognizing that there is work that needs to be done to rectify this situation.  We will proceed down this long and dusty road.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM CDT #


Boss,

I was looking forward to being able to hear from you at the open forum in Area 3 at the Budlong Library. When I last attended the open forum I asked you about issues surrounding the stripping processs of officers and you said you would change it and you did. I am hoping that you are going to re-schedule your forum so those of us who want to hear you out and ask questions are able to do just that.

Posted on April 15, 2010 at 02:36 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I promise I will reschedule.  Will try for May 2010.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 02:54 PM CDT #


It is now 1802 hours on 15 April and the squad floor here at AREA 2, is 83 degrees, with a squad floor where you cant open any windows. Last year we had portable air conditioners brought in. Do we AGAIN have to go thru another summer of 85-95 degree office tempatures. I'm sure the tempature at 3510 S. Michigan is comfortable enough where sweat beads dont build up and drip onto your desk. I don't understand what the purpose of Facility Management is if for 2 years now they can't fix this problem here or at Area 1. Thank-you.

Posted on April 15, 2010 at 06:16 PM CDT #


Supt.,

As a supervisor, I have submitted numerous awards for the officers that I work with. Unfortunately, many of them have been pending approval for almost a year if not more by various exempt members that I will not name here. The annual recognition ceremony and the St. Jude parade is quickly approaching and I know that many officers look forward to these events because it is one of the happier times that they get to wear their dress uniform proudly (as opposed to wakes and funerals). Many officers bring their families with them and it is like a reunion running into old friends/partners/bosses that they used to work with. It would greatly help morale for these officers to be able to wear their awards that they have earned while putting their lives in danger for the citizens of Chicago. Do you think that you can have the exempts take a look at these numerous pending awards and either approve or deny them so that these officers can proudly display them at these events? It is a small token of appreciation for what these officers do day in and day out but it means a lot to them. Thanks!

Posted on April 15, 2010 at 10:57 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for your comments.  Our personnel are our most cherished resources.  Weapons, vehicles, automation, training, equipment, and facilities are all important, but nothing rivals the value of our personnel.  I will emphasize your position, again, to the command staff.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 12:17 PM CDT #


Since you have already made use of your contacts with the Department of Justice, perhaps a joint task force of some sort is in order that would expedite the long overdue arrival of federal corruption charges against the emperor you call your boss.
At this point, due in no small measure to an insulting contract process and equally offensive results of same, the only way you will garner the respect of us pawns rests in the unlikely prospect of you one day putting him in handcuffs and helping to land him where he deserves before the certain fate of some future heart attack robs us all of the pleasure.

Posted on April 16, 2010 at 10:51 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I am at a loss to understand why you somehow think I can "make up for" the contract, that went to arbitration for a decision, by somehow identifying the probable cause that the mayor has engaged in corrupt activities?  If you know of any evidence of corrupt activities by any elected officials, I recommend you contact the FBI and pass that information along.  Public Corruption is their #1 criminal priority here, and throughout the nation.  And if your reference to my "contacts" involves somehow convening a federal grand jury, presenting a case to that body, convicing them to return a true bill, convincing the defendant to plead guilty, persuading the US District Court Judge to sentence the defendant to a penalty outside the guidelines, well, I appreciate the power you have bestowed upon me.  However, there is not a Police Chief in the country, or even a Special Agent in Charge of a FBI Field Office who could do that.  Even Chief Bratton, who I consider the absolute best, would be unable to pull that off.  As for your contract, I'm sure both sides see "wins" and "losses."  But, that is part of the negotatiation process.  Seeing other major departments who have been forced to reduce officers, sell horses, sell helos, and other drastic measures, the process seems to have worked for the CPD, especially when you consider the nations's economic position.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:59 AM CDT #


Sir,

Wouldn't a pragmatic compromise in response to recent requests that we also take unpaid days off have been to meet half way by simply allowing for those days to have been voluntary? A simple addition to the new "time due" slips would have been the introduction of another box the officer could check to designate the elective day off as "unpaid day off," in addition to the other elective time off options.
Currently the only way to take unpaid time off is by way of a suspension or a leave of absence which requires extensive approval up the chain of command. As usual we lost the ongoing 'P.R' battle in the sphere of public opinion in that we were perceived as simply rejecting the idea outright.
Of course, as a mandatory program it should be met with resistance since to date there is no proof that all other top level city managers are complying, or that they didn't first receive a substantial increase in pay to cushion the so-called unpaid furlo days. In any case the option to take, say, no more than 2 unpaid days off per period, not consecutively, and not attached to regular furlos would assist an officer wanting to bank comp time as well as help address at least some of the cost cutting measures currently of concern. In exchange, those days ought be approved with the same priority as personal days. That is, if an officer is willing to save the city some money, they ought not be met with excuses for why they can't have that day off.


Posted on April 16, 2010 at 11:15 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not sure where your question is, and if you are speaking about the contract.  The contract is awaiting ratification by the City Council.  However, I applaud your creative approach.  That is how we overcome obstacles.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:43 AM CDT #


I would like to know if light of the fact that Sup/Bruske at the meeting in 7th district indicated i could call the IPRA office and seek out what if any open number's or investigations are underway, regarding my circumstances. I called the day after the meeting and was told that when the "director talks to Sup/Bruske, she will get back to you." Obviously, I have heard nothing to date.

Secondly, when will the last meeting, cancelled be rescheduled?

Thanks, 11624

Posted on April 19, 2010 at 01:40 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I would recommend contacting IPRA.  They are forthright in their investigations regarding status, unless the matter is criminal.  As for the meeting in A/3 that we had to cancel, I hope to reschedule that in May.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM CDT #


Good Afternoon Superintendent Weis,

Is it possible that your office could coordinate visits with Police Officers interested in a tour of the CPD Crime Scence Lab? If Probationary Police Officers visit the Medical Examiner's Office when they are in the Academy, they should also visit the Crime Scene Lab. I believe this arrangement would prove beneficial to both Officers and the Detective Division. If members actually observed the procedures involving Crime Scene Processing, perhaps they would see the importance of being a more thorough preliminary investigator.

Posted on April 20, 2010 at 01:09 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Recommend you contact the Academy if you are seeking training on forensics.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:32 AM CDT #


If having tact and gangs in uniform for the summer is a legitimate tool for reducing crime, why aren't they always in uniform?

Posted on April 22, 2010 at 03:00 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The uniform of the day is normally driven by the mission.  Inasmuch as we are looking at probability models in an effort to anticipate where and when crime may occur, having a visible presence is a key component in achieving that level of prevention.  However, since Gang Enforcement is seeking out the worst of the gangs, the shooters, those who are committing the violence, they will not be in uniform.  They will remain in CD as they have been throughout the year.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM CDT #


Unit Watch Application has been around for years and should be updated. May I make the a few suggestions to make information access easier and eliminate a few unit reports? If these can be added then units can eliminate manual reports for the listed function and be able to use crystal reports to make needed rosters.
#1: add a field for an Alternate/Mobile phone numbers and change the term "Home Phone" to "Main Contact" number.
#2: add about 4 user definable field for units with special needs such as identifying sections within a unit or personnel with special/unique functions such as liasons or weapons teams.


Posted on April 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

See below - JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM CDT #


Dear Superintendent,
I work in the 8th district and as of last week chicagocop.com was blocked from all the computers. As an officer that works on the street this has become a valuable resource. I rely on this website to pull up complaints, felony 101s, etc. Can you please unblock this website from CPD computers. I would really appreciate it.

Posted on April 22, 2010 at 02:35 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Let me look into this.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM CDT #


Unit Watch Application has been around for years and should be updated. May I make the a few suggestions to make information access easier and eliminate a few unit reports? If these can be added then units can eliminate manual reports for the listed function and be able to use crystal reports to make needed rosters.
#1: add a field for an Alternate/Mobile phone numbers and change the term "Home Phone" to "Main Contact" number.
#2: add about 4 user definable field for units with special needs such as identifying sections within a unit or personnel with special/unique functions such as liasons or weapons teams.


Posted on April 22, 2010 at 02:51 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are doing a makeover of our automation.  I will pass these concerns onto the folks in ISD.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 02:52 PM CDT #


The CR process is antiquated and counterintuitive. As a former detective I can attest to the fact that it takes longer to unfound a clearly false CL# as it does to clear close a Robbery by arrest and prosecution. When will the CL process be reviewed and updated by people who actually know what they entail? Why does IPRA initiate 3rd party, non-witness CL#s when a signed afidavit is required?

Posted on April 22, 2010 at 06:36 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The IAD is reviewing it's procedures and protocols at this time.  I expect them to have a better process before the end of the year.  As for IPRA, I'm not going to express my comments about another agency.  However, its Administrator is very open to questions.  I'd suggest you contact her re: your concerns.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:21 AM CDT #


I WAS WONDERING WHEN MORE LOCKING MECHANISM'S WILL BE PLACED IN DEPT. VEHICLES FOR THE CARBINE'S. THERE ARE ALMOST NO VEHICLES WITH THE THEM SO WHEN OFFICERS COMPLETE THE TRAINING TO BE QUALIFIED TO CARRY IT WE CANT BECAUSE THERE ARE NO LOCKING MECHANISM'S FOR THEM. AND WITH THE LIKELY SPIKE IN VIOLENCE THAT IS INEVITABLE WITH THE SUMMER I THINK THAT THIS IS A PARAMOUNT ISSUE. IS THERE AN APPROXIMATE TIME AS TO WHEN MOST IF NOT ALL DEPT. VEHICLES WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH THESE?

Posted on April 23, 2010 at 03:56 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are working on this as we speak.  I will ask the BAS to provide the department with a status as to where we are with this project.  JW



Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM CDT #


RE:Above post-"Crime Scene Lab". FYI, The "Crime Scene Lab" and "Crime Scence(sic)Lab" do not exist.The Chicago Police Dept.Crime Lab was eliminated years ago.The ISP took over the lab work.

Posted on April 23, 2010 at 06:48 AM CDT #


Superintendent, I would like to know what plans you have for the FTO program. I seem to remember a judge ordering that the city eliminate the existing six training districts and go back to the training districts that existed before. IN addition, I'd like to if the FTO that resigned their status will be given the opportunity to get it back. Thirdly, I'd like to know how long will all that take to implement.

thanks

Posted on April 25, 2010 at 11:47 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response
As you are aware, this is a public blog and from the beginning I have made it clear that I cannot and will not address labor matters on the blog, as it is not an appropriate forum.  I recommend that you contact your bargaining representative to discuss the matter directly.  JW


Posted on May 03, 2010 at 05:10 PM CDT #


Dear Supt. ...since many cars are working 99, we have to deploy them intelligently....that being said...I notice that O.E.M.C. sends a car to every single ambulance call.I totally understand being sent to a fire,or a major event involving the C.F D....but getting sent to a drunk downer or a person having back pain ect....is a waste of manpower...I understand saftey, but there has been times when several cars were down assiting the fire dept....especially in 001/018, where people getting stuck in an elevator is as routine as they come....the building security in that respected business should be properly equipped to handle the majority of the assists that the fire dept. requests.

Posted on April 25, 2010 at 05:12 PM CDT #


Can a crosswalk be painted across 35th street by the HQ building? Many employees and citizens cross in the middle of the street dodging cars and buses. There is a handicap ramp that exists just east of the DeLaSalle sign where a crosswalk could easily be painted. If one wants to cross in a crosswalk, as it is now, it is either at State or Michigan. I understand cars may not allow us to cross any easier with a crosswalk, but it may at least make crossing busy 35th street a little safer. Thank you.

Posted on April 26, 2010 at 03:32 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We will reach out to CDOT to see if we can make this happen.  Great idea.  JW



Posted on May 03, 2010 at 05:21 PM CDT #


Dear Supt.,

Without question, the Chicago Police Department is, unequivocally, one of the most elite police forces in the world. Contrary to the media-influenced belief that we are "power-hungry citizens on patrol", the department has a proud history of truly representing law enforcement in general, and the practices and idealogies are clearly being utilized by various local and international police agencies. My question/concern is, if we are recognized as one of the elite, why are we driving around in squad cars with extensive physical damage which are definitely in need for a complete make-over (e.g. crash-related damages, peeled paint, dirt)? To be quite frank, it's utterly embarrassing. Granted the squad cars are in "operating" conditions, the physical appearance of many of these vehicles are a laughing matter to citizens, and the lack of technological tools/devices in some of these squad cars are of another issue. I feel that I am limited to what I can do personally about this issue as a 1st Watch officer. Can something be honestly done about this, or does the lack of funds make an imperative, yet negative, impact on possible repairs? Thank you.

Posted on April 26, 2010 at 03:52 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Our only answer is that we are replacing those vehicles as quickly as we can, given the limitations that our funding places on us. As far as repairs, Fleet has contracted with private vendors for mechanical, electrical and body work to get cars repaired as quickly as they can.  We will continue to march forward. JW



Posted on May 03, 2010 at 05:20 PM CDT #


Regarding the 48hr Rule:
I don't believe any other big city, LA, NYC, Dallas, and so forth, have made the situation so difficult. Only in Chicago will the interpretation of the rule be so strict. It's almost like the city wants to be sued.

Regarding lasers on handguns:
Are the Tasers going to have their lasers removed? Your answer does not make any sense. One of the reasons the Taser works so well is the because of the laser. How many lasers will be on any one offender? Maybe two at most given the limited numbers in our department.

Maybe the mayor can deploy the traffic aides and meter maids that took over police billets. Swarm the 9% areas with a ticket and traffic control blitz.

Posted on April 27, 2010 at 12:47 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Lasers will not be removed from Tasers; they are less than lethal force weapons.  My comments applied to our weapons.  As for the 48-hour rule, I believe Supt. Hillard signed off on that.  The decision was based upon exisiting case-law.  JW



Posted on May 03, 2010 at 09:46 AM CDT #


Why are p.o.'s being stripped from units and districts to go patrol areas unfamiliar to them? I work in the gang unit, and I know the gangs in my area well. Now I will be in an area unfamiliar to me, working with p.o.'s that I don't know. I will probably be unable to do the same level of work that I am doing now, as I am sure many of the other officers being pulled into the summer strike force.

Posted on April 27, 2010 at 04:07 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I understand change is not often received with open arms.  However, we are down more than 700 officers, so we have to try something different.  By focusing on histroical locations, or locations with emerging crime patterns, we can more narrowly focus on the most violent areas of the city with less officers.  We have to try something different if we want to achieve different results.  I'm sure the officers being deployed in this manner will learn their assigned locations quickly, and serve us well.  JW



Posted on May 03, 2010 at 09:50 AM CDT #


We are so short on the street, we are getting ripped apart in the media, suggestions of bringing in the National Guard by public officials, WHATS NEXT. The departmarment believes by developing and utilizing Units such as the Tru Unit, Mobile Strike Unit and now a Summer Mobile Strike Unit is the answer to slowing down the crime rate in the city. These Units are not the answer. You have good working officers assigned to these units. You really need to disband these Units. The officers need to be assigned back into districts where it is desperately needed. Placing the units in high crime areas as needed is not the answer, its only temporary. Results are seen in the districts when officers know the ins and outs of their assigned district. District Officers are able develope a rapport with the community. They develope the knowledge of the areas in their district to focus on. The citizens begin to have more trust in officers they see in their community on a regular basis. Sending outside units in defeats everything. WE NEED TO REGAIN THE RESPECT OF OUR UNIFORM FROM THE CITIZENS OF CHICAGO ONCE AGAIN. OFFICERS OF ALL RANKS ARE SEVERLY DISRESPECTED BY THE CITIZENS OF CHICAGO. WE CAN THANK THE MEDIA FOR THIS DISTRUCTION. Sending outside units into districts distroys the rapport of communities. OFFICERS NEED TO KNOW THE DISTRICTS THEY WORK TO BECOME EFFECTIVE IN RESOLVING CONCERNS (Homicides, shootings, gangs, robberies ,burglaries)witnin the districts. People are more forth coming in speaking with officers who they know or see on a regular basis. OFFICERS GAIN A HUGE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION FROM THE PEOPLE WITHIN THEIR ASIGNED BEATS ONCE A RAPPORT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. Talk to the officers i of the districts who have remained in some of these district for years. You will see those officers can give you the ins and outs of the districts. Those officers have developed a rapport with the community and have earned there respect. Those officers are the ones who know where to come down hard in an area of high concerns. MOST IMPORTANT THOSE OFFICERS KNOW WHOS DOING WHAT ON THEIR BEATS. THE OFFICERS ASSIGNED TO STATED UNITS HAVE BEEN DOING A GREAT JOB!!!!!!! The problem is we are not utilizing our hard working officers correctly. I guarantee you will see a huge difference in the crime rate.

Posted on April 27, 2010 at 06:38 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Crime continues to go down, 16 months in a row. 2009, 5th lowest homicide totals since 1965, with nearly 600 officers down (averaged throughout the year). I firmly believe, that there needs to be a blend of district personnel and city-wide units.  We must have the flexibility to move resources quickly to address emerging crime trends.  I agree with you a 100%, the beat officers should know their areas better than anyone else.  However, we have kept the speiclized units (MSF and TRU) in specific areas to allow them to know their AOR better.  They are under the control of the BOP, so I believe that there is a much more cohesive blend of these units with the DL personnel than when they were assigned to a different Bureau.  I see your point, but I think we can be more effective with a mixture of personnel.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:54 AM CDT #


I just read your Vehicle and Technology Update section and the progress that has been made is very good, I thank you for that. As far as the automatic ticket writer, how do we get them installed in the Tahoes we have already? The printer brackets are in the Tahoes but the printers are missing.

Posted on April 28, 2010 at 06:21 PM CDT #


I'm not sure which grand jury's you have been to, but as the saying goes you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. The Federal government will overpower any defense with their vast resources which are no match for any average person. If I were to guess 99% of the grand jury's are given true bill status. To find US attorney to go after any type of public corruption should be even easier. As John Lennon said in Forest Gump, "Well it's easy if you try..."

Posted on April 29, 2010 at 01:37 AM CDT #


I have a suggestion on how to increase some revenue for the Police Department. Since being at Alternate Response I realize actually how many people require the physical copy of a police report. The department charges a mere 50 cents to get a copy. Some suburbs charge charge five or ten dollars for a report copy. If the department raises the fee to 1 or 2 bucks, it would generate more revenue. Just a thought..
#19638

Posted on April 29, 2010 at 08:07 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

And a good one at that.  Passed this to the BAS for evaluation.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:57 AM CDT #


Supt,
I am a US Marine (once a Marine, always a Marine). I shot the M-4 and was trained to use it by the best, the Marines. Why do I have to take a POWER test to prove that I am capable of shooting and handling the M-4? I've been trained on properly handling the weapon in urban enviorments.
I have talked to other Vets and we all agree that our service to this country should be enough to carry the weapon, that we shouldn't have to prove ourselves by taking a POWER test.
I know your feelings on physical fitness, and Supt. I agree with you 100%, no mater what our schedule, we should find a couple hours a week to stay in shape. That being said, I can safely say, I fought side by side with some VERY heavy Marines, they couldn't run fast, they breathed heavy, but they had heart, they had courage, and they could shoot the center ring of the target at 500 meters after running EVERY TIME.
The fact is, we are not going to run after an offender for a mile and half, then shoot the M-4. Most cases may be a matter of seconds, your heart rate will raise, your breathing will be effected reguardless of what kind of shape you are in. The M-4 is a very effective weapon, and every officer who takes the streets everyday, should be allowed to carry it (with the proper training)reguardless of their fitness level.
I would like to take this chance to thank you for the recent Dept. Notice awarding all Veterans and those who have served, the Military Service Ribbon. It is long overdue and much appreciated.


Posted on April 29, 2010 at 11:16 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

POWER test is not going away.  We may tweak the order to address other issues, but POWER test is going to stay.  Sorry.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:30 AM CDT #


Could you please approve an optional uniform item for detectives? If/when detectives have to go into uniform (lets face it we all know it's coming) they blend in with the p/o's on crime scenes. Could you please authorize the dark blue shirt that ET's and other d2 personnel wear as an option for detectives? Most if not all detectives will have to buy a new uniform anyway when the order to go into uniform comes out.

Posted on April 29, 2010 at 06:51 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Sent to Peterson and Byrne for consideration.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:29 AM CDT #


Supt. could you address arrest report narratives please. It clearly asks for the probable cause to arrest. Why is it that we are constantly having to put in extra lines such as clear gip, clear trap,clear investigative alerts, clear leads, arrestee property inventoried under..., arrestee has x amount usc on his perosn. My favorite is when the desk sergeant asks us to put investigator notified for juvenilles in the narrative when there is a section for that in report itself. I know its tedious but at the same time that has nothing to do with the probable cause to arrest. On a short arrest narrative, all those extras make up half of the narative.

Posted on April 29, 2010 at 08:32 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I directed ASA Cuello to look into this matter.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM CDT #


The other day while working lockup, officers arrested a guy with a swollen eye. He refused medical treatment stating it was an "old injury". When the prisoner van came to get him in the morning, they refused to take him saying the county would'nt accept him without a hospital clearance form. This is an unnecessary expense added to the taxpayers as well as a waste of use of manpower sitting in the E.R. with them. Is their a waiver form that the watch commander and arrestee can sign off on to prevent this situation in the future?

Posted on April 29, 2010 at 09:02 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I forwarded your question to DS Dugan to research and advise.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:26 AM CDT #


The mass retirements may allow you to raise the retirement age to 65 from the current mandatory 63. This would address many concerns; pension fund, manpower, and the loss of experienced officers. Studies have shown that older workers can be dependable and do not have as many family obligations as younger officers. I do concur that the street officers of today need to be young and strong but there are many support positions that are necessary for those officers to be as effective as possible. The trend today, because of longer life projections,is to raise retirement levels ie recently passed Illinois pension statues as well as Social Security. This would also eliminate the two year gap for health care before Medicare kicks in at 65 as officers hired after 1986 contribute to Medicare, however I was hired in 1971 and do not. If you cannot do this for everyone can I be the lone exemption. PS I am at Homan Square and still waiting for the new exercise equiptment that was promised as I have had to delay my exercise program which will allow me to make it to 65. wharej B&A

Posted on April 06, 2010 at 06:45 AM CDT #



Posted on April 30, 2010 at 06:33 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

As you are aware, this is a public blog and from the beginning I have made it clear that I cannot and will not address labor matters on the blog, as it is not an appropriate forum.  I recommend that you contact your bargaining representative to discuss the matter directly.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:25 AM CDT #


I hope the "Ford Fusion" you speak of for the Detective Division is a typo. I thought the Detective Division was going to be getting some of the unmarked Tahoe's. The "Ford Fusion" is smaller than the Impala and everybody knows the Impala sucks. How are we supposed bring a prisoner back to the area from outlying counties wanted on Chicago warrants in a clown car "Ford Fusion?"

Posted on April 30, 2010 at 11:22 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

At this point in time, it was a Fusion, or nothing. I wanted to get the D some newer vehicles.  I'm sure there are some detectives who will welcome a newer vehicle; please give them yours.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:24 AM CDT #


Ther was talk of allowing us to carry personal 12 guage shotguns, at least Remington 870's if we were qualified. Did that ordergo in the circular file cabinet. I personally would rather carry a shotgun over the M4 any day. In an urban envioment as ours, the shotgun has great take down power and is not a threat farther than about 15-20 yards with 00 buck. I have shot both in the past and would gladly carry a 12 guage over the M4. I know what the shotgun can do and know it has the knockdown power and it is a very east point and shoot weapon to use.

Posted on April 30, 2010 at 11:27 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not sure I agree with you that a .32 caliber pellet, traveling around 850 fps, is not a threat at over 20 yards. JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:22 AM CDT #


Since most of the newer police stations being built use a key card for access, do you think you could convince the powers that be to issue detectives a universal key card that will work citywide? Some districts have their spare key cards attached to glass coffee mugs which can be a safety issue and others don't have any spares at all and we can't get in or out of the lockup or we get locked out of rooms all together.

Posted on April 30, 2010 at 11:41 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Look into this.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM CDT #


Now that Operation Safe City is a Performance Based Overtime Initiative what does this mean for those p.o's who work inside. They are being denied the chance for this overtime opportunity. This doesn't seem quite fair that just because someone has chosen to work inside, or is routinely scheduled there that they should be punished for doing so.

Posted on May 01, 2010 at 12:14 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

As you are aware, this is a public blog and from the beginning I have made it clear that I cannot and will not address labor matters on the blog, as it is not an appropriate forum.  I recommend that you contact your bargaining representative to discuss the matter directly.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:19 AM CDT #


Superintendent,

I have a money making suggestion also. To make a long story short, a friend told me how he was involved in a domestic situation out of state. When the police came they told him he had 5 minutes to grab some stuff and leave. If he needed longer he would schedule an appointment to have 2 uniformed police officers present while he moved out or got whatever he needed, at 25 dollars an hour, which was the going rate many years ago, and there was a 2 hour minimum. In today's ecomomy the department can charge 50.00 an hour per police officer. A flat rate of 35.00-40.00 for the officer per hour and 10.00-15.00 to the city. A police officer works four hours on an RDO and makes 160.00 and the city gets 40.00....not bad! Maybe, once the word got out, just maybe this may free up some officers because the citizens know they schedule to have police present instead of always calling 911.

Posted on May 01, 2010 at 09:35 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Will provide your idea to the Budget office. JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:17 AM CDT #


Supt:

Since we are understaffed, why don't we look in to hiring the policemen that are getting laid off from the surrounding suburban depts(example 4 from Park Ridge & 3 from Mount Prospect). Most of them went through our academy, (metro classes). They are already trained and they have street experience. All you need to do is train them in CPD rules.

Posted on May 01, 2010 at 06:01 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

It's a funding issue that is restricting our hiring.  We are exploring the possibility of hiring officers from outside agencies, but we must first receive the authority to hire; who we hire is another question.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:12 AM CDT #


Just a quick mention...I was at the Academy on Friday, 30 April 2010, and was embarressed by the outside grounds of the academy. The grass was almost a foot high and covered with weeds. Knowing that the Wellnessd Day was going on, I can't help but think of the bad impression that this might have made. I know in the scheme of things, that this may seem trivial, but the appearence of the Police Academy should be something that we are proud of.

Posted on May 02, 2010 at 08:43 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I advised ADS Lodding to look into the landscaping of the Academy.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:10 AM CDT #


I was at the CPD Academy on Friday and could not believe the grass. It looked terrible. We need to have pride in our appearance.

Posted on May 02, 2010 at 11:13 AM CDT #


Supt Weis, I have a suggestion that directly reflects upon this Dept. I know that the ordinance allows police officers to use a cell phone WHILE CONDUCTING PHONE CALLS OF AN OFFICIAL NATURE. But many of these phone calls are not of an official nature and therefore in violation of the ordinance. It might look better to the public, since I have heard lots of comments lately, to prohibit ALL Pos from using the phone while operating a Dept veh. We cannot enforce a law that we violate ourselves!

Posted on May 02, 2010 at 01:32 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I think it is important for officers to have the ability to communicate LE actions for their safety, and for the safety of our residents.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:56 AM CDT #


Is there any progress on getting LEADS 2000 and Accurint access to the masses?

Why is it so hard to get an inventory out of ERPS on a Sunday night (when the place is empty) for court on Monday? The officer working the desk says he can't do it and adds this helpful hint, don't come back on Monday either as there will only two people working. Sounds like someone would like to go back to a beat car if ERPS is too stressful.

Thanks for making the temp. in Area 1 bearable.

Why not offer some type of semi-retirement for officers? Let them work part time, collect their pensions, etc. They could assist in identifing offenders, pick up inventories, and other odds and ends, like the Cook County States Attorney's investigators. It would need a lot of bugs ironed out to make it work. It is a shame the city is getting rid of some vast knowledge and wisdom just because some one is 63 years of age.

Posted on May 02, 2010 at 08:56 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I asked DS Peterson to look into the ERPs issue.  Working on a total automation makeover, so hopefully that will improve our systems.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:06 AM CDT #


Can someone turn off the heat in area 4

Posted on May 03, 2010 at 07:08 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I advised the BAS to check on this.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:07 AM CDT #


Sir,

It is appreciated that you take time to review these comments and post responses. A tool that has been severely restricted, and basically taken away from the police officer, is allowing patrol units to sign disorderly conduct complaints. Some watch commanders will refuse any arrests where a beat officer signs a D.C. complaint. I think the Department should encourage beat officers to enforce 8-4-010 (c), (d), and (g) sections of this ordinance. The law department says we should only enforce these ordinances as a last resort. Allowing beats to enforce these sections will help improve quality of life and allow the police to be more aggressive in thwarting criminal behavior by removing offenders from the streets before they engage in more serious crimes. Please look into this for us before the summer months our on us.

Thank you for you time in considering this request

Posted on May 03, 2010 at 11:30 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I believe there is some legal prohibition regarding having a police officer's peace being breached.  But, I can see where this could be a useful tool.  i will ask legal to address this matter.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:03 AM CDT #


Dear Supt.,

I am a 19 year veteran of the Chicago Police Department. Since becoming a Police Officer in what I consider one of the finest law enforcement agency in the country, I have never been more excited about having a work schedule like the 10 hour work day that is currently implemented in the 005th & 020th districts. Though the days may seem long, the Officers are rewarded for their hard work with the excitement of having three and four days off. I have spoken to many of my comrades in the 005th district and many of them shares the same excitement. For those of us who absolutely love this work schedule, we hope the powers to be continue to make the 005th district a place where we enjoy serving the citizens of the City of Chicago.

Posted on May 04, 2010 at 06:49 AM CDT #


I have a question regarding award ceremonies... I found in a AMFN notice that I am to receive a Department Commendation on 18 May 2010. The notice states that confirmed awardees should contact the awards section at least 2 days prior if absence is due to medical, furlough, court etc. I will be on furlough and leaving town that morning so I called yesterday 03 May to make my notification. I was disappointed to be informed, basically, too bad - you can come pick up your award a week after the date if you don't attend. I find it terribly defeating that the presentation can't be pushed back to the next months ceremony. The event I am being recognized for happened in 2008 - is one more month really asking too much of the awards section? Every ceremony I have attended has had roughly 200 awardees listed of which never more than 100 attend - I don't think it unreasonable to have awardees be given the opportunity to attend in such an instance. These ceremonies are a rare instance to share with our families the successes of our efforts on the street and have an intimate recognition from the department. Thanks for the consideration!

Posted on May 04, 2010 at 11:10 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I agree with you.  If someone calls and asks to be recognized the following month, I have no problem with that at all.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:58 AM CDT #


Superintendent, I was wondering when you get a chance could you take time to look at an award which was submitted for your approval in December 2009. Thanks

Posted on May 04, 2010 at 10:36 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Need a name to check on this?  E-mail Bob Roman if you feel more comfortable with him, rather than me, knowing your identity.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:56 AM CDT #


Dear Superintendent,

For years, I have watched retired Chicago Police Officers standing on the sidelines of the St. Jude Parade. Why should those who served with dignity and honor not be allowed to march with those who picked up where they left off? I spoke with a few retirees who stated that of the many things they miss when they retire, one of the most is marching with their fellow brothers and sisters in blue to honor our fallen. Can an effort be made to permit retired Chicago Police Officers the opportunity to march with us in next year's parade? These men and women proudly served this City, taught many of us, and gave of themselves day in and day out. They, too, should be allowed to march until they choose to no longer do so. Any consideration would be appreciated. Thank you.
an an attempt be made to allow retirees who still wish to march in honor of our fallen brothers and sisters in next year's

Posted on May 05, 2010 at 10:54 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Excellent idea!  I will make sure we invite retired officers.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:55 AM CDT #


Is there a way that we could implement a computerized vehicle inspection? While I work CTA Special Employment, I notice that every watch must fill out a vehicle inspection sheet, and officers are told that they are to be held accountable for any damage that they do not report. The cars that are used for CTA employment are in pretty good shape. I get pretty fed up with officers writing on the ceilings, carving the steering wheel with a knife, or just treating the vehicle like crap.

If we implemented a log-on screen for vehicles with computers that asked for mileage, damage, etc.. and when Sunday rolls around and the Sgts have to do their vehicle inspection report, then they could log in and get the mileages from the vehicles, and any damages reported to the vehicles in the district, instead of waiting for officers to fill out a piece of paper and bring it in to the station. It would get officers on the street faster, and it would free up some of the paperwork. Plus, it would put the officers on the spot on a daily basis to report damage instead of trying to determine who did the damage on the vehicle every Sunday morning.

Just a suggestion

Posted on May 05, 2010 at 11:43 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Excellent idea!! I directed the BAS to look into this and see if we can make this happen.  Thank you!  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM CDT #


Why not give these new Ford Fusions to the Command Staff to drive. When was the last time they had to put a prisoner in their back seat? The Crown Vic's that they are using can then be put out on the streets. Image shouldn't be a factor. If it's good enough for us it has to be good enough for them.

Posted on May 05, 2010 at 07:58 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I brought this up to DS Peterson.  I am sure he will address this with his personnel in the BIS.  I thought most folks would appreciate a new car, rather than s vehicle with 30K - 50K miles on it.  Guess I was mistaken.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:50 AM CDT #


Why is there such a limited number of Semiautomatic Transition Classes available when there is such a huge interest? Five seats are available for each class and you can only enroll at a certain time period but the number of seats always lessen before that enrollment period, why is that? Do I need to "know" someone to get into the class because I have been trying for a month now.

Posted on May 06, 2010 at 01:31 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

It's all about resources.  We have a limited staff to teach firearm classes. We will continue to try and increase our training numbers.  JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:47 AM CDT #


Why can't we have a universal code for the buildings or a key pass for the lockups? When working in a citywide unit..we are left standing at the door, or trying to get in and out of the detention areas because we are "guests" within the district. It is absolutely horrendous in the 10th District with the lock-up key pass. Can anything be done about this problem?

Posted on May 06, 2010 at 07:31 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I don't know.  Let me have the BAS look into this. JW



Posted on May 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM CDT #


Supt, I have a question. A lot of these posts are requests to have you take care of something that has not been addressed thru normal channels. Why are people not being held accountable for not taking care of these simple requests such as turning off the heat in the Detective Division Areas. When someone in District Law is told to do something, it gets done or heads roll. Why does the Superintendent of Police have to tell the engineers to do their jobs. Are they claiming that these problems have not been brought to their attention? For God's sake, they work in these buildings too!!!!!!

Posted on May 07, 2010 at 02:58 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

You make an excellent point.  I would ask everyone to use their chain of commmand and take individual responsibility for items they have control over.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 04:48 PM CDT #


In reading some of the comments about district access and how each district has a different code or you need a key card, it is frustrating when working special employment and trying to gain access. Why not make our department ID cards the key card for entry to every district like they are used at HQ.

Posted on May 07, 2010 at 08:47 AM CDT #


Sir~
As a Watch Commander, I appreciate the importance of on-going in-service training. However, with the realistic manpower shortages we now face, sending multiple officers to different in-service training classes on an almost daily basis places extreme stress on our ability to adequately staff beat and sector cars. This requirement, coupled with the threat of disciplinary action if we do not comply and send officers to trainig as demanded by matrix, adversely affects both morale and officer safety.

As an example, on one day last week, our watch had one officer at Search and Seizure class, one officer at taser training, one officer at mandatory weapons qualification and two officers detailed to out-of-district events. Notices have now been posted requiring lock-up keepers to attend mandatory training which will require having a beat officer cover the lock up.

Is there anything that can be done about multiple in-service training attendance requirements that drain district manpower?

Posted on May 07, 2010 at 01:17 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Mission will always take priority over training.  Just say no.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 04:56 PM CDT #


Why can't we have a universal code for the buildings or a key pass for the lockups? When working in a citywide unit..we are left standing at the door, or trying to get in and out of the detention areas because we are "guests" within the district. It is absolutely horrendous in the 10th District with the lock-up key pass. Can anything be done about this problem?

I agree with this Officer..what a hassle it is awaiting entry while escorting a prisoner

Posted on May 07, 2010 at 05:03 PM CDT #


After reading the many suggestions on this blog, it is amazing that anything gets accomplished in this department. It seems the working officer, sergeant, and detective manages to get the job done in spite of the department.

Now that's it's nice out, when will the exampts be hitting the street? It's a waste of gas for them to drive around and avoid crime but at least they get to hear how busy it is out here and maybe they will be a little more understanding when they ask for more numbers.

Posted on May 07, 2010 at 05:39 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Most of the exempts are out on the streets at least one night a week.  I see them doing street stops, chasing guys with a gun, clearing corners, and other functions.  As for asking for numbers, I ask for the number "zero."  Reduction of crime is where it's at.  Not arrests for minor infractions that make no impact whatsoever on public violence.  If you don't believe me, read about Baltimore's focus on reducing crime.  It mirrors what we are doing and it works.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:42 PM CDT #


The third largest city in the country should really have it's own rifle range. There is plenty of open space on the south and west sides of the city.

Once the illegal gun ban is revoked, the city can even make some money on it by letting citizens use it. Staff it with some retired coppers.

Posted on May 07, 2010 at 09:19 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are continually working to bring better training opportunities to the department.  Your point is well taken.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:45 PM CDT #


--Since we are understaffed in the Districts, and officers are being denied time off, would it be possible to assign PO's from the units to fill in the districts in these situations so people could get time off?

I know a W/C can call another district and ask for bodies, but most times the districts they call are short manpower as well and cannot help out. It would be nice of a W/C could call TRU/MSF and request a few bodies for a day so that someone could get the day off.

Posted on May 08, 2010 at 07:56 AM CDT #


The other day while working lockup, officers arrested a guy with a swollen eye. He refused medical treatment stating it was an "old injury". When the prisoner van came to get him in the morning, they refused to take him saying the county would'nt accept him without a hospital clearance form. This is an unnecessary expense added to the taxpayers as well as a waste of use of manpower sitting in the E.R. with them. Is their a waiver form that the watch commander and arrestee can sign off on to prevent this situation in the future?

----Same issue at the JISC. Why is it that every juve that has a minor injury, admits to drinking or smoking pot, or is pregnant have to go to the hospital?

I have been at the JISC where they actually look for injuries, old and new and if they find anything, they make you take the juve to the hospital.

How about some guidelines for the JISC personnel? like ... if a juve is acting out of sorts from drinking/drugs... take them to the hospital. If a pregnant female is complaining of stomach pains... take them to the hospital. If it appears a wound is serious... take them to the hospital.

It's ridiculous to have to go to the JISC, then have to take a juve to the hospital, wait for hours and have the city/taxpayers pay for emergency room and dr bills and then return to the JISC for processing.

I can see this happening for juves who are actually going to be housed, but for juve's that are being RELEASED to their parents it is just a waste all the way around.

Posted on May 08, 2010 at 08:15 AM CDT #


Why is there pressure to make POD related arrests from downtown? This just leads to lots of MCC arrests better handled by the ANOV procedure. Big numbers may justify the money spent for them -and PODs have their place- but if they were great at facilitating arrests you wouldn't need to put pressure on people to use them.

Posted on May 08, 2010 at 11:24 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We want to take advantage of all technology that we have.  We can do more with the cameras that will support the officers on the street.  Therefore, we are pushing the use of cameras in support of LE actions.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:35 PM CDT #


Dear Sir, IPRA generates a CL number when a 3rd party non-witness makes a complaint of a "false arrest" even when there is no substantive complaint of violation of any law, rule or order by the accused officers. Whether or not the CL is converted to a CR, Internal Affairs records and tracks these complaints, exposing the arresting officers to future liability. Several recent CLs assigned to me have been this type of non-witness 3rd party complaint where a friend or relative has called IPRA after learning of an arrest simply to state that their friend or relative is innocent. CLs are not issued for recipients of traffic tickets whose only complaint is that they are not guilty. Why should they be issued when someone who is not even present for an arrest wishes to express the belief that their friend or relative is not guilty of some crime when that crime will be adjudicated in court? This generates hours of work for supervisors, and the requirement by our Department that all accused officers must be named and recorded with Internal Affairs regardless of accusation creates a negative record of the arresting officers which can be brought up in future civil litigation. Is there anyway to instruct IPRA to screen their calls to prohibit such baseless complaints? Eric Winstrom #1625, Sergeant 025

Posted on May 08, 2010 at 11:48 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will ask Bob Klimas to look into this and get back to you.  Thank you for identifying yourself so we can help resolve this issue.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:32 PM CDT #


I could not make it down to Springfield, but I heard that CPD was NOT represented at the Memorial with any vehicles WHY? We are the biggest police dept in Illinois Yet you did not have any vehicles in the parade WHY?

Posted on May 09, 2010 at 03:48 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not sure about a parade, but there were a couple of marked CPD vehicles there.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:33 PM CDT #


We have all been told we are full strength at 13,500. Is that the budgeted amount? What is our budgeted 2010 manpower total? Common sense says if we are budgeted for that many, we have the $$$ for that many. That's how budgets work.

Posted on May 10, 2010 at 11:56 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The authorized staffing level for the 2010 budget is 13,473.  Budgets are based upon many factors, one being income projections, which have not been as anticipated.  That is why there is a shortage of police officers.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:29 PM CDT #


A way to give the citizens the illusion of more police would be to issue the the exempts marked patrol cars.

Posted on May 10, 2010 at 06:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not a bad idea, but we are short vehicles in general.  I would prefer that the working officers have the marked vehicles to perfrom LE functions.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:26 PM CDT #


A way to gain more lt's on the street would be to only have one lt assigned to the detective division areas. Make them work 3rd watch and the commander works days. The lt's in SVU and RBT aren't necessary. The sgt's in the areas are already watch commanders and run the daily operations. Take the lt from HGS and have him/her overlook SVU and RBT.

Posted on May 10, 2010 at 06:55 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will pass this on to the Chief of Detectives and Deputy Peterson.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:25 PM CDT #


I'm glad the captains now have to be evaluated by the district commander. The sections they are graded on are reasonable.

Posted on May 10, 2010 at 07:02 PM CDT #


Does the department have any plans on making any explosive detection canines to fill the open spots at the airports. With the TSA paying for them couldnt we lose the funding if they are not filled. Its been a few years that those spots have been vacant. Rumor has it that the department is going to let the city bomb dogs cross over to work as T.S.A. explosive dogs. If true, would that be fair to the officers who took the test for the T.S.A. dogs? The city guys were given the opportunity to take the test and did not.


Posted on May 11, 2010 at 09:48 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'd run that by the command staff at the airport.  If they don't have an answer, check with Chief Pat Daly.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:23 PM CDT #


boss, why did you deny the code 049 for the honor guard, the motorcycles and the pipe bands for springfield and wash dc? it was embarrassing not seeing one marked chicago police squad in the springfield parade. all the recruits wearing their khaki's didn't look good either. as you know, cpd put a name on springfield's wall and that same name will be put on the wall in dc. a lot of us feel like this was a slap in the face to our fallen officer.

Posted on May 11, 2010 at 06:27 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are down nearly 800 officers.  It was my decision not to carry officers Code 49 to attend this service when we are short this many officers.  However, if you truly wanted to pay respect to our fallen officers, aren't they worth a few hours of time due?  We bring the recruits up to show them what this profession entails.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:05 PM CDT #


Supt.
rumor has it that there was an opening on the mayor's detail? was this considered a "task force," and, if so, where was the opening posted?

Posted on May 11, 2010 at 08:48 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This is not considered a task force. JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:01 PM CDT #


Hi Sup,

I read in the Daily Bulletin we should be turning lights off. Do you think that motion switches would be better so that lights would go off after a period of no one being in an area? This would be beneficial in HQ for sure. There are no light switches in many places and lights stay on automatically for 24 hours.

Posted on May 12, 2010 at 11:32 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will have the BAS look into this.  I like the idea - why waste energy if no one is there.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:00 PM CDT #


There was talk of allowing us to carry personal 12 guage shotguns, at least Remington 870's if we were qualified. Did that ordergo in the circular file cabinet. I personally would rather carry a shotgun over the M4 any day. In an urban envioment as ours, the shotgun has great take down power and is not a threat farther than about 15-20 yards with 00 buck. I have shot both in the past and would gladly carry a 12 guage over the M4. I know what the shotgun can do and know it has the knockdown power and it is a very east point and shoot weapon to use.

I agree with the fact the pellet is still a threat, but the spread pattern is very wide after this range.

One thing you never answered was the impending order that was on the table,which we were informed about by the range instructors to carry the Remington 870, whether department or personally owned, ever went anywhere or is it dead?

Just that many PO's have a preference to be able to carry a shotgun over an M4.

Posted on May 12, 2010 at 12:36 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Personally owned shotguns was never on my radar screen.  In an urban environment, research shows the rifle has a greater capability for taking a longer surgical shot.  Most people find the rifle easier to use than an shotgun, and easier to shoot with the reduced recoil.  So, bottom line, no plans to expand the shotgun program.  JW



Posted on May 18, 2010 at 05:22 PM CDT #


I actually would favor the Ford Fusion. It is a smaller vehicle, but I would imagine that if needed for a transport, the Crown Vic's would be available. Figuring I use a 98 Crown Vic with 72000 miles, it still is in better shape than many newer district or unit vehicles. Most in the Detective Division would be happy to get the Fusion's. One thing about the vehicles in the Detective Division, they are not abused and last for quite a few years longer than District Tact vehicles.

Posted on May 12, 2010 at 12:42 PM CDT #


The department should offer financial crimes training for detectives. Get TCF Bank, Chase, a mortgage company, postal inspector, states attorney, financial crimes detectives and so on. The training should be aimed for the average property crimes detective. Most detectives hate these cases because they are not familiar to them. Give information on who needs to be interviewed, what documents are needed and such. Also, let Felony Review sit in on it. All the training in the world is useless if the ASA doesn't understand the charge.

Posted on May 14, 2010 at 02:13 PM CDT #


Please Supt. please establish a policy of not letting vendors to come to roll call that are not department sanctioned. Sometimes I come to roll call and I feel as if I am getting ready for an infomercial. If I want to purchase a product I have the ability to be an educated consumer on my own.


Posted on May 14, 2010 at 07:20 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Vendors should not be coming to roll call.  I will have the General Counsel discuss this practice with Deputy Superintendent Dugan.  Thanks for letting me know.  JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 01:23 PM CDT #


I found some more police, will save money and are already available for duty!

Take the Security Specialists (D3 pay) from Alderman Ed Burke and put them back in a beat car at D1 pay! The mayor doesn't need a large security detail, if any. An alderman has no need for one. If he wants to feel important, let him hire some off-duty police at time and a half from his own expense account.

Posted on May 17, 2010 at 05:21 PM CDT #


I just read the new addition regarding persons under department control. Very amusing. So, if I understand this right, the beat car has to take prisoners to the hospital if the receiving party wants a medical clearance. Great idea. Down more beat cars and tie up hospital emergency room staff for no reason. I hope one of our loved ones doesn't need the emergency room bed while it's being tied up with a prisoner with no medical need.

To add insult to injury, if I take my kid the ER I get hit with the co-pay/10% AND $100 surcharge if they're not admitted. The prisoner on the other hand gets the treatment for free. What a system.

Posted on May 17, 2010 at 05:32 PM CDT #


Since prisoners will be going to the hospital more often now, why not have a doctor from the Department of Human Services or Cook County Hospital check all the prisoners going to bond court automatically? They are already on the government payroll and will save a trip to the ER.

Posted on May 17, 2010 at 05:59 PM CDT #


I like the webcast of the Superintendent Speaker's Series for those of us working 1st Watch...we can watch it at home. A great idea, but the audio was so distorted that it was unwatchable. Please have someone check the audio levels of the webcast as it goes out.

Posted on May 17, 2010 at 09:57 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for letting me know about this.  I will have this fixed.  JW



Posted on May 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM CDT #


I love the new weapons, and I think that the incorporation of the rifle has been an unqualified success. I'd like to ask for one change however. Officer's ability to purchase and carry their own rifle should be carried over to those officers with shotgun training. They fit in the gun racks, and I think they are a more effective tool in an urban environment.

Posted on May 18, 2010 at 11:08 AM CDT #


Why are vendors allowed to solicit business at roll calls?

Posted on May 18, 2010 at 08:47 PM CDT #


Would it be possible to convert the cells in the older stations to mirror the cells in the new stations? The 9th district lockup has cells that are impossible to hang yourself in. They also have a padded cell to place mentally ill patients in. The cost of the conversions will be far less than any future lawsuits

Posted on May 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM CDT #


Sir,

Why are Policemen's guns routinely being swabbed for DNA?

Are the test results entered into CODIS,(along with sex offenders,et al)?

Thanks for your time.

Posted on May 20, 2010 at 09:28 AM CDT #


A way to deal with the 48 hour rule would be to take some cases handled by detectives away from Felony Review. As it stands now all felony cases other then narcotics are reviewed. A new procedure could be in place to have the cases reviewed by the detective division watch commanders. Have them review burglaries, strong arm robberies, thefts, sex offender registration and the other "phone jobs" where felony review doesn't come out. If it's a heater case for any of the above, let felony review check it out. But for the other run of the mill cases there is no need for felony review to tie up OUR 48 hours. If they want to have their investigators seek additional information after the offender is charged that would be their prorogation and not limited to the 48 hours. If this works out, expand it. It would also free up Felony Review ASA's to handle the call out cases quicker.

Det. MAXSON #20990
Area 1 RBT
(I can't take most of the credit for this idea but I don't know if the other detectives and supervisors want to be named)

Posted on May 20, 2010 at 01:20 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will run this down thru your chain of command.  JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:23 PM CDT #


I am not sure why you find it surprising that members of the Detective Division would be unhappy at the idea of driving a Ford Fusion. I would like a newer vehicle but at 6'06" and wearing my vest and gear I would have a difficult time in it. We might as well have a two seater. As far as the transport issue, if a person believes that "the Crown Vic's would be available" I have to ask wonder how often they make arrests and need to transport someone. We need full sized vehicles.

Posted on May 20, 2010 at 05:55 PM CDT #


hi i would like to know if check studs could be posted on line therby saving paper as a lot of officers leave their check stubs in the box

Posted on May 20, 2010 at 07:28 PM CDT #


I just read facsimile message #101695 in reference to a survey being conducted by the University of Illinois at Chicago. That got me thinking, what ever happened to the last survey from some months back by Lt. Engstrom? Shouldn't the results of that survey be available by now?

Posted on May 20, 2010 at 10:29 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Should be, let me have this done. JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:20 PM CDT #


Supt.,

It's clear that you're an advocate for physical fitness, and I'm on the same level. As a matter of fact, I usually hit the weights during my allotted half hour lunch at least four days a week. As far-fetched as it may seem, how about proposing to extend that lunch period, giving P/O's like myself the extra time to work out? Even a minuscule 15 minutes would help, extending the lunch period to 45 minutes. Unfortunately, the physical condition that many of my fellow P/O's are in is frightening, and one would hope that this proposal would be somewhat of a positive motivation towards visiting that gym in the station.

As Fred Perry once said,

"Tactics, fitness, stroke ability, adaptability, experience, and sportsmanship are all necessary for winning."

Posted on May 21, 2010 at 02:18 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

You know as well as I do that schedules are linked to contractual decisions, which I will not discuss on this site.  However, people should want to get into shape, if not for their job, then for their health and well being.  Most of the physically fit folks I know get their workout in when they can.  Some are early risers and go before work; others like it at the end of the day.  I would encouage everyone to exercise, not for the job, but for their life, and for the lives of their family members. JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:19 PM CDT #


Can you add a box or check mark for the AIRA and CLEAR reports for businesses? Right now there are only boxes for first and last names. An additional box is needed for a business name. When an officer has to complete a report for a business, for example Auto Zone, there can be several variations. When trying to assemble pattern crimes it becomes difficult to track them.

Det. Maxson


Posted on May 21, 2010 at 03:38 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'm confident the makeover we are giving to our AIRA and CLEAR systems will fix this problem; however, I will pass your comments on to ISD.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on May 25, 2010 at 11:07 AM CDT #


I tried using the homan square gym as I have for the past several years. Unfortunately this time I was not able to get a locker to secure my belongings. There are guest lockers that always are taken and only a couple of people are using the gym. I talked to other officers who went to the gym and decided never to return because they could not get a locker. Can you contact the commander of OCD and have him take care of this issue.

Posted on May 22, 2010 at 08:10 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Chief Brown has higher priorties than checking gym lockers.  Here's an idea - go to a private gym.  Chicago has quite a few, probably very close to your home.  JW



Posted on May 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM CDT #


A way to give the citizens the illusion of more police would be to issue the the exempts marked patrol cars.
Posted on May 10, 2010 at 06:50 PM CDT #

Superintendent's Response
Not a bad idea, but we are short vehicles in general. I would prefer that the working officers have the marked vehicles to perform LE functions. JW

Ok, How about saving money and still creating an illusion? Put the 'MP' plates on the exempt cars, or at least the 'M' plates. No reason to pay $99/year for regular plates when 'M' or 'MP' plates cost $8.00 for their lifetime.



Posted on May 22, 2010 at 08:11 AM CDT #


It sounds like detectives won't be getting LEADS 2000 or ACCURINT access anytime soon (hunting down the one or two people who have access is not efficient or effective when factoring in furloughs, days off, medical, court, watches, etc). Which is fine, I get paid the same regardless of the clearance rate. Can you at least add in a phone number search for offenders, arrestees, suspects, businesses, witnesses, and so on when CHRIS and CLEAR are revamped?



Posted on May 22, 2010 at 05:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'm positive the upgrades we are making to our automation systems will improve the processes you discussed.  JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:15 PM CDT #


Sup,
Can you explain to me and others. How can the fire department promote 40 Lts, 18 capts, and chiefs. Where does the CFD get the money. They also have been hiring during the same time we have not. I know its not the police dept, But maybe you can find the answers.

Posted on May 22, 2010 at 06:10 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The short answer is that because of the contractual complexities at the CFD it is cheaper for the City to promote and staff than pay the minimum manning OT, the out of grade and the variances that are needed when staffing levels fall too low.jw



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:14 PM CDT #


'Address the issue of Leadership in this department, and you will raise morale instantly. Lastly, YOU should be making decisions on who is a leader on this department. Not the Mayor, not the City Council, and DEFINITELY, not the community or church leaders. YOU are the Superintendent. YOU are the decider.
Posted on March 20, 2010 at 02:50 PM CDT #

Superintendent's Response
First, 70% of the leadership positions are made by test scores; that's the way it is.
----------
Boss, I will have to take issue with your response to this officer's post. 70% of what I will call lower to middle management which includes ONLY Sergeants and Lieutenants, are made by test scores; THAT'S the way it is.

100% of all upper middle and upper management appointments are made by YOU.
This would include Captains, District Commanders, Directors, Deputy Chiefs, Chiefs, Deputy Superintendents, Assistant Deputy Superintendents, and Assistant Superintendents.

I'm sure the OP meant these upper middle and upper managers in his post; the people who are making policy; we all know Sergeants and Lieutenants are not making policy.


Posted on May 23, 2010 at 09:23 AM CDT #


Dear Supt. Weis,
I am a Sgt. This date two of my officers along with myself transported a juvenile to the JISC for further processing. His mother had been notified, all paperwork completed, and he was thoroughly searched, by the officers and myself. We arrived at the JISC at 2130 hrs, and we did not get attended to until 2322 hrs. No reason. They have a holding facility and staff. We as the arresting officers should be able to drop off our prisoner, and return to duty. As I said, all the paperwork was complete. After the desk officer TOLD us to search our prisoner again, while he sat at his desk, and then asked our prisoner if he was ill, in need of medical attention, or had been drinking or using drugs, he sent us upstairs. There we sat longer. Then the detective talked to the prisoner, looked over our completed paperwork again, walked away for a length of time, returned and told us we could leave. I did not identify myself as a sergeant, I just wanted to observe the circus, that is the JISC. We were not the only officers present, there were 3 sets of additional officers that were put through the same scrutiny as we were. It is my belief that if this is going to operate efficiently, and frankly IT DOES NOT! a review of the JISC needs be enacted. It seems to be a hiding place for those who do not wish to work the street, and all with bitter attitudes. The department had proficient youth officers that processed the juveniles in the district and got us back on the street. This new method is a complete waste of man power, and man hours. Something needs to be done. This desrves an audit. This is not the first time that this has been observed by myself, or told to me or my lieutenant. It is truly frustrating and without resolve.
Thank You for your time on this matter.


Posted on May 25, 2010 at 12:59 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.  I will make sure Deputy Peterson looks into the operation of the JISC.  JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:12 PM CDT #


I have noticed that a growing number of officers run a subjects Illinois drivers license or state identification number instead of a full name check. This might be eaiser but it will only give you a LEADs and NCIC response. Chicago warrants not in LEADs will not show. Neither will Investigative Alerts and Submit Information Report requests. Officers need to be informed of the negatives of this practice.

Posted on May 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM CDT #


Boss,

I have 14 years on the job which puts me on the border of a lot of overtime oppourtunities. I occasionally will look up seniority to see if I would have had enough time to get a specific overtime initative. I was wondering if maybe a tab can be put on every overtime initiative that shows the lowest senior officer's seniority date for that watch or better yet, if I check the roster of officers who are assigned during a weeks time or even by the whole period, it would show the lowest senior officers seniority date. this way when an officer can easily check and see if he has aenough time to get that particular initiative. Thanks in advance!!

Posted on May 25, 2010 at 11:51 AM CDT #


Sup; When will you reschedule your last town hall meeting, which was postponed?



Posted on May 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not sure at this time.  We are in our busy season, so it might be awhile.  Feel free to ask any question you may have on this blog site, or thru a personal e-mail.



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 01:28 PM CDT #


SUP; I have suggested to you in the town hall meeting, 007 district the question of what can a 63/retiree, do for the department. What can the department offer the 63/retiree, if he or she wants to continue a career with the CPD?

Secondly, what avenues are available to one who wants to be a teacher/trainer at the academy, for and to give something back to the recuirts coming up the ranks?

What compensation would be available?

Thanks appreciate the reply.

Posted on May 26, 2010 at 12:42 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

At this point in time, there is no option for someone after age 63.  I do not see this changing any time in the near future.  JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 01:27 PM CDT #


Sir,

Can we possibly eliminate the use of paper for attendance awards? A minuscule "atta boy" award shouldn't waste so much paper. We should just have it electronically placed into our personnel file and be done with it. And I'm positive that would cut the backlog for more worthy awards.


Posted on May 26, 2010 at 12:01 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I sent your suggestion to HR for them to consider.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on June 01, 2010 at 01:25 PM CDT #


Sir,

Instead of eliminating paper for the attendance awards,an alternative would be to eliminate the award.

I don't believe that an award is warranted for showing up to work.



Posted on May 27, 2010 at 06:45 AM CDT #


Sir,
I heard a rumor that there will be no more written test to be a Chicago Police Officer, is this true?
Why doesn't the Dept use the Illinois Association of Cheifs of Police Testing Program? The test measures reading comprehension, arthmetic, grammer and incident report writing skills. Once the test is given, the scores should then be posted and the applicants would ranked for everyone to see.
The Illinois Association of Cheifs of Police Testing Program also has a test for Supervisors.
Both of these test are used through out the country by numerous State, County and, I believe, Federal Agencies and from what I have heard there has been no accusations of the test being racially biased.


Posted on May 27, 2010 at 02:08 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The test will continue to be given; the point at which it will be given will change.  All applicants will have to pass an examination.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:37 AM CDT #


Ive heard that some folks are upset about the response you gave regarding the locker question at Homan Square. First of all, they shouldn't bring those type of questions to you. I could think of many other people to bring that problem up to. I think the response was appropriate. I am sure I will now be a topic of that foolish second city blog now. That site only brings problems for people with the speculations and comments that are not realistic at all....

Posted on May 28, 2010 at 06:53 AM CDT #


Sir,

I recall sometime last year it was asked about letting officers use polo shirts as an optional uniform shirt. Has this matter been looked into, and if so, where does the Department stand on this?

Posted on May 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not sure what the Uniform Committee has done with that topic.  I will ask and see where it's at. JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:40 AM CDT #


Supt,
I would like you to comment on the rumor or fact that the Lts promotion tests will no longer be used for promotion it will all be merit like the Capts. If this is a fact will you use the current list to promote if and when you can promote? Will you consider promoting in rank order limiting merit promotions to the last from this list? many of us are waiting patiently for our chance to be promoted and some of us are high enough on the current list to expect a fair chance at promotion.
Thank you

Posted on May 29, 2010 at 05:20 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We will continue to promote LTs as we have in the past.  We will continue to use the current LT's list for quite some time.  I never cease to be amazed at these insane rumors that are generated by folks who don't have a clue.  Maybe they need more work to do, or to simply get a life.  Remarkable!  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:48 AM CDT #


Have you considered allowing detectives access to the CPD databases from smart devices while in the field?. We don't have access to sign out PDT's. Having access to Clear and Chris would be extremely helpful while out in the field.

Posted on May 30, 2010 at 05:18 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I asked Commander Lewin to look into this.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:45 AM CDT #


How come chicagocop.com keeps getting blocked out by the department computer. It is a very usefull site for working police officers! It simplifies the confusing often changing department clear system website. The site chicagocop.com works sometimes then gets blocked, then works, then gets blocked. (it is now blocked as pornography) Who ever is in charge and keeps blocking it should maybe work the street, make an arrest and probably wish they had that site as a resourse.

Posted on May 31, 2010 at 02:39 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I thought we had this fixed.  I have directed BAS to look into this and determine what the problem is.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:43 AM CDT #


Dear Supt:

Will bicycles be available to those who are going to do the Lakefront Overtime Initiative? These are a great policing tool.

Posted on June 01, 2010 at 02:11 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

That will be up to DC Keating.  I'm sure he will consider all options.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:35 AM CDT #


Sir,

Can we possibly eliminate the use of paper for attendance awards? A minuscule "atta boy" award shouldn't waste so much paper. We should just have it electronically placed into our personnel file and be done with it. And I'm positive that would cut the backlog for more worthy awards.

What you can't stay off the medical? Staying off the medical for 3 years is not an easy task give em a piece of paper.

Posted on June 01, 2010 at 06:26 PM CDT #


Supt,

Nice work getting this blog out there. It has been very informative. An earlier post commented on how AIRA reports put the narrative in all capital letters. I too want to emphasize the problems this is causing. The narratives have become tough to read and even if you try to start a new paragraph, the completed report is one big run-on. This is a problem especially with search warrant cases, where you usually need several paragraphs to explain the chain of events. I have also had State's Attorney's comment on how difficult the new automated reports are to read, especially ones that have longer narratives. Look it up for yourself and see what you think.

I know you said there are improvements to automated reports being made. I hope that this is one of them. Thanks for your time.

Posted on June 01, 2010 at 09:54 PM CDT #


2 questions.

Now that the Sgts have approved their contract, when can we see movement in the area of replacing those 30-50 or so who will take advantage of the 55-60 retirement health care? You've repeatedly addressed the idea of promotions with a "it's not likely" response.

How can the Dept function with the appropriate level of supervisory influence without the appropriate level of supervisors, Sgts or Lts?

Posted on June 02, 2010 at 12:54 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We argue with the Budget Office on this topic on a regular basis.  I'm hoping to be given the authority to promote in the near future.  However, this is not something I have control over.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:34 AM CDT #


Sir,

As I sit here and read your blog, I notice that to almost every question regarding a suggestion or comment you reply you will check into it, have someone check into it, or forward it to a different section/unit to be looked into. After that response there is NEVER a follow-up as to the information that was calculated or received, the decision reached and why it was reached. So my question is, why are we not receiving any of the answers to our questions and only receiving a preliminary answer of, "we will look into it"?

Posted on June 02, 2010 at 01:22 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Mw plan was to let people know that we are looking into their issue, and then allow for the action taken to serve as the final disposition.  I can wait and post comments after I receive the final verdict, but often times, that will be serveral weeks down t he road.  There isn't really a way to post multiple comments to the same issue.  But, I can try it with a definitive answer and see how that works.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:56 AM CDT #


Superintendent Weis,

Thank you for your efforts to place Tasers into the hands of the working men and women of this department. My colleagues and I usually work 10-99 as 3rd Watch Rapid Response Officers, and we are often outnumbered when responding to calls. We recently had a domestic incident where one of our officers fell down a flight of stairs while attempting to subdue a combative offender. The officer will be I.O.D. for months, and as you know, we are already short-handed. I am convinced that a Taser could have prevented this officer's injury.

Many of us missed out on the first round of Taser training, and we would be very grateful for the opportunity to attend the next round of training as soon as possible. Too often the Tasers are collecting dust on the shelves instead of being deployed by officers that want to carry this effective device, but are unable to do so from lack of training.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Posted on June 02, 2010 at 03:59 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have directed the Training Academy to continue with the Taser training.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:32 AM CDT #


Superintendent,

Is there any plans in the future to make a detectives class off the current list? Without a class made in over 2 and a half years the rumors are flying about the list being taken down and replaced with a panel board system or the list is to old etc. Even though the few classes that were made were only between Dec. 05 to Dec. 07. I know the economy is not great, but a little insight for us, officers that took the time out of our lives to take classes, study, attend study groups, and today are still working in busy districts would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

Posted on June 02, 2010 at 09:58 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The list is not being taken down.  We want to promote the SGTs first, then the detectives.  We discuss this weekly with the Office of Budget.  I can't say when we will promote detectives, but the list is not coming down.  JW



Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:30 AM CDT #


recently i have been losing many opportunities to do a search warrant. because we don't have any judges available after 10pm. being a city as large as we are, it would be very beneficial to have a judge on call for these things. many times a john doe is willing to help at night, and in the morning, theyre gone. how much influence do you have to get a judge on call?

Posted on June 02, 2010 at 11:55 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

From Legal:  There is no formal judicial forum available for “off-hours” search warrants.  The courts, as with other public agencies, are fiscally challenged, and it is unlikely that such a forum would be established.  Often, such warrants also present safety challenges for officers as well.  I suggest that you enlist your supervisor in addressing this challenge and to help identify ways to effectively target the criminal action, for example, a switch in starting times or acceptable documentation of the “John Doe.”  Further, if sufficient indicia or exigency are present, the BIS, either through the Detective Division or the Gang Investigations Section may also available to assist in obtaining search warrants. 



Posted on June 23, 2010 at 06:53 PM CDT #


If you want more traffic tickets written, make traffic court a little less painful. I doubt the city will ever provide parking downtown for us but maybe some spots could be set aside at the first district and a caps van could travel back and forth to pick up and drop off the officers.

Posted on June 03, 2010 at 05:44 PM CDT #


Dear Sir,

Who responds to these posts and your emails? I have been disappointed with the lack of follow-through on the posted "superintendent's response's" as well as replies to your personal email. I am afraid that failure to respond, or responses that may be considered tersely dismissive by some, could defeat the purpose of this board (and your suggesting that we email you) by frustrating the vital dialogue between your office and the officers on the street.

Sgt. Eric Winstrom #1625

Posted on June 03, 2010 at 07:19 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I respond to every one.  Sometime I ask folks to research the information for me, and I will paste in their answer.  As for follow-up, I have attempted to have my staff research these matters and provide answers, rather than to say I have directed them to address the matter.  And, I apologize if my remarks are dismissive; however, sometimes you can only answer questions so many times, and when it is clearly a chain of command matter, I do say that.  I have an open door policy, but not a back door policy.  Besides, has any other Superintendent provided a forum such as this?  JW



Posted on June 19, 2010 at 06:21 PM CDT #


Sir
Is it true that female officers that recently had children and are breast feeding, have to be given the time and opportunity to pump at their assigned areas? If so could someone tell the 003 Dist 3rd watch, watch commander

Also, would someone tell the 003 Dist, 3rd watch, watch commander that all officers can take classes if they desire and shouldnt be penalize by a spiteful watch commander for doing so.

Posted on June 04, 2010 at 02:37 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The blog is not the appropriate venue for raising management issues.  Both matters that you bring forth seemingly arise out of the interaction with your direct supervisor.  Therefore, I recommend that you bring these issues to the attention fo your chain of command, namely your district commander, to address them in a timely and appropriate manner.  DSO 03-14 outlines the policies for nursing mothers who are Chicago Police Department members.  The District Commander is responsible for ensuring implementation of this policy.  JW



Posted on June 19, 2010 at 06:04 PM CDT #


Sir,

There was an earlier post,(19MAY10,I believe), regarding the routine DNA swabbing of Policemen's guns.

Any input on this?

Thanks.

Posted on June 04, 2010 at 06:19 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

From Detective Division:  The swabbing of the weapon has been determined to be a best practice in police involved shootings.  However, the specimen is not entered into any database.



Posted on June 23, 2010 at 06:58 PM CDT #


Sir,

Given the shortage of manpower,why not let P.O.'s work Special Employment in their district of assignment? They already know the geographical area and station personnel know them. They also know who the players are. This knowledge is valuable,maybe even life-saving.

I believe their productivity would vastly increase.

This could also be done in specialized units.

This is not my idea. This was done many years ago and worked fine.


Thanks.

Posted on June 04, 2010 at 06:42 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Let me check with Commander Gross and give you an educated answer.  thank you for this idea.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:54 PM CDT #


Would it be possible to either:

1) Start a new thread for Q & A, or

2) Have the thread post in reverse order, so that the newer posts/responses are at the top?

Posted on June 04, 2010 at 07:29 AM CDT #


Superintendent

There is a serious problem w/ security at Northwestern Hospital attempting to have Det's relinquish thier weapons in order to be admitted to the surgical waiting room for victim interviews. I and other Det's refuse to relinquish our weapons in an unsecure facility while on duty. These same facilities allow the "family and friends" of the victim's to come up, and of course if they are armed we won't know until it is to late. I know other officers have actually relinquished their guns and I feel it is my duty to point out that this is never acceptable. As Det. T. Murphy told the security gaurd, "If it goes up for grabs up there what are you guys going to do?" "Call 911" was the response. "Are you going to have them check their weapons before they come up to help". Det. Murphy was not allowed upstairs. This same issue came up at Jackson Park Hospital several months ago and the security guard responded by saying "other officers comply all the time." I would hope all officers on this dept. could be educated on this serious saftey issue.

Det. John Otto
Area 2

Posted on June 04, 2010 at 10:27 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I asked the General Counsel to form an answer to this one, so here goes:  


I have checked with the management for the BOP and the Detective Division, and none are aware of any ongoing issue with Northwestern Hospital in this regard, nor of your specific incident.  I would recommend in the future that should such a circumstance occur that you first try to address the matter with a supervisor in the facility.  If that does not work, then a CPD supervisor should be called so that appropriate departmental response and documentation of the event can occur. 


 


Legally, they have no right to demand that you surrender your weapon.  Law, department policy and order of the court control when and how officers may possess weapons.  However, rarely will the arrest of hospital personnel address the underlying issue of the need to investigate.  Rather, ensuring prompt resolution of the matter at the time, through use of a CPD supervisor if necessary, is the better route.



Posted on June 23, 2010 at 06:48 PM CDT #


Im curious. I never have a problem logging on to this blog and commenting or reading the inane comments and responses. How come I cant log in to do a contact card from any computer I've sat on in the past 3 days. I have about 30 contact cards that I have yet to complete because the system just keeps looping me out. What a joke for a so called 21st century advanced department. Please get this problem fixed asap. And another thing, tell someone in data systems to do something about the problems with the times on the contat cards so that when you submit one for example at 1300 it doesn't tell you that that time is in the future because the contact card program thinks its still 1200. Such little problems that should NEVER even occur but that seem never to get fixed.

Posted on June 06, 2010 at 12:41 PM CDT #


Dear sir,
For a court deviation, officers are required to complete a To-From-Subject report. This report is then scanned into Iclear to be included in the automated SPAR. The contents of the report are then typed into the SPAR. The information from this report is then added to the Court Infraction Report. The Department then has 2 typed copies of redundant material included in, and attested to, in the automated SPAR. If an automated signature is legally sufficient to attest to a criminal arrest report, why is it not sufficient for a court deviation? When will the SPAR system be utilized as intended-to reduce paperwork, redundancy and inefficiency? Having officers type reports for information that will be typed separately into the SPAR anyway is a waste of the officer's time.
Sgt. Eric Winstrom #1625

Posted on June 07, 2010 at 07:31 PM CDT #


Dear Supt:

I am writing to you to suggest that the CPD in conjunction with the FOP produce a streaming video regarding Flexible Spending Accounts(FSAs), healthcare insurance, life insurance and disability policies.

I am also requesting via I-Clear, that CPD members have access to their court dates/special assignments through a computer mechanism at home.

Thank you.


Posted on June 08, 2010 at 02:45 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

From DS O'Keefe:  


Payflex, the administrator of the City’s FSA, has an informative tutorial on their website. We have created an E-Learning module that has been posted on CLEAR today. Department members can receive information on FSA through this tutorial. The Department of Finance has requested that we not post the sign-up form since registration for the FSA can occur only during the City’s benefits sign-up and modification period which generally happens in November. At that time all employees will receive a complete packet of benefits information, including instructions on how to register for all health care benefits, including the FSA.


 


The enhancement to CLEAR, to enable members to access information about the court notifications and special assignments will have to be incorporated into the remake of our web portal. It is currently anticipated that that will take some means 6 - 8 months from now. ISD is exploring a short-term solution that will automatically send email notifications to officers when a court notification or work deployment is generated-- this will be accessible from any web-connected computer or portable device and should be implemented in the coming months.



Posted on June 23, 2010 at 07:06 PM CDT #


Sir,

RE:Northwestern Hospital:

Since when does a private entity dictate Police Department policy?

And since when do Policemen take orders from "security guards"? That's embarrassing.Is this what the new CPD has turned into? Sad,very sad.

It is certainly NOT safe to check your gun while conducting a Police Investigation.As the previous Detective noted,it is also a public safety issue.

These Policemen who check their guns at hospitals should peruse the G.O.'s. for some guidelines concerning matters like this. I couldn't find any that command you turn over your gun to so-called hospital "security".

Wouldn't this be considered an attempt to stop or interfere with a Police Investigation and wouldn't they would be subject to arrest?

I feel this issue needs to be addressed ASAP,as this is a news-worthy incident waiting to happen.

Thanks for the Forum.





Posted on June 08, 2010 at 06:58 AM CDT #


Regarding the no guns in a hospital policy.

I would recommend the following:

Ask for the highest ranking hospital offical to meet you at the ER or where you are at. Tell them if you are not allowed to interview the patient with your weapon you will lock up the hospital offical as it is Chicago Police policy to arrest people for obstructing justice. See how quick hospital policy will change then.


Det. Maxson

Posted on June 09, 2010 at 03:33 PM CDT #


CAN THE AREA ONE DETECTIVE DIVISION PLEASE GET SOME WORKING PRINTERS? WE HAVE ONE PRINTER THAT WE HAVE ACCESS TO AND THAT PRINTER HAS HAD NO INK CARTRIDGE FOR TWO WEEKS. WE ARE TOLD THAT THE INK IS ON ORDER. THE COMMANDER'S SECRETARY TELLS US IT IS ORDERED. WE NEVER HAVE A RESERVE SUPPLY. WE ARE NOT CERTAIN IF SHE FORGETS TO ORDER THE SUPPLIES WE NEED.

Posted on June 09, 2010 at 03:47 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will leave this problem with your chain of command.  it should not take the superintendent of police to secure printers.  Talk to your Sgt, Lt, and/or commander.  JW



Posted on June 17, 2010 at 08:31 PM CDT #


What is the purpose of issuing Investigative Alerts on victims?
If they want to be found they can call the number on the victim information notice. They already know how to dial 911 so we know they know how to use a phone. How much will the city be paying out when one of the victims is arrested on accident? Not to mention most named offenders haven't really been identified correctly.

If this is being done to clear more cases, here's a novel idea. Hire more detectives. If the city doen't go for it then the city is saying the clearance rate isn't that important after all.

Posted on June 09, 2010 at 03:50 PM CDT #


Still trying to figure out what Chief Brown did that was sooooo great in the detective division as a lt to get him repromoted several ranks to chief.

Posted on June 09, 2010 at 04:03 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Chief Brown is creative, refuses to accept the status quo, looks to improve efficiencies, pushes his personnel to new heights, demonstrates both courage and conviction, and is loyal to the department.  In simple terms, he is a leader. We would be well served with many more like him.  JW



Posted on June 17, 2010 at 08:30 PM CDT #


Boss, you stated in a previous post, "Sgts will be promoted first then Detectives." Although its a moot point since the Department refuses to promote any officers this makes no sense. There are numerous Detectives high on the next Sgt list. (A Sgt cannot leave to make Detective) It you promote Sgts first you will further deplete an already ridiculously understaffed Detective Division. If and when you promote a token 50 Detectives (for five areas, units, Jisc Center and three watches) each watch will be lucky to receive one Detective. Unless a Detctive left the watch to become Sgt in which case the manpower remains the same. Detectives need to be promoted prior to Sgts to maintain a mirage of manpower.

Posted on June 11, 2010 at 06:21 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The idea to promote Sgtes, then detectives, was the decision of both DS Steve Peterson and Chief of Detectives Tom Byrne.  I try to give as much lattitude as possible to the DSs to run their respective Bureaus.  I would recommend you discuss this through your chain of command.  JW



Posted on June 17, 2010 at 08:26 PM CDT #


I just read fax message 101916 regarding the traffic stop statistical study being extended to 01JUL15. I guess we didn't find any profiling or racism in the department so the study has to continue until we do. How many years has the search been going on? 10?

Posted on June 12, 2010 at 05:15 PM CDT #


I was just thinking what Sgt. Winstrom wrote. To expand on the response time, why can't the information posted here be read by you and then forwarded to the related division for a response.

For example, if there is a question in reference to an interview with a witness like Det. Otto had forward that to the office of legal affairs for a response. It should only take 48hrs at most, the same amount of time to charge a person. These are the experts in their fields and are paid at a higher pay rate. Asking for their advice for all to see seems reasonable. Maybe it will even save the city some money from a lawsuit.

Posted on June 12, 2010 at 06:23 PM CDT #


Any chance that the personnel assigned to the Blackhawk parade downtown can be recognized/awarded a deployment operational center award or something similar for the outstanding job they did on said day ?

Posted on June 14, 2010 at 08:13 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

People did a fantastic job. It was a great day for the city. However, I am not sure that a special award is merited for this operation.  I will discuss this with the Deputy Superintentents and hear their option on this matter. JW



Posted on June 17, 2010 at 07:05 PM CDT #


I think it's great that the Traffic Stop study is extended another 5 years. If an extra 5 years is good, 10 are better. Eventually we'll find some type of profiling in this department. Think of all the extra man-hours put forth to this study on an overworked department. It's a great use of police resources. It will surely lower the crime rate. We need more innovative programs like this.

Posted on June 15, 2010 at 06:27 PM CDT #


Sir,

I just wanted to sincerely thank you for helping me out. I was the officer who was unable to be paid after completing the POWER test in OCT/2009. Lt. Pigott was outstanding and went great distances to assure that I did in fact get paid. I know you constantly get dumped on by numerous persons, but I just wanted to let you know the outcome of this incident. Again you have my sincere gratitude and wanted to thank you for coming through and doing what you said you were going to do.

SP -005

Posted on June 16, 2010 at 11:42 PM CDT #


Supt Weis,
Would it be possible to equip E.T's with the portable finger print terminals that the department was showing off a few years ago? Presently when there is a prisoner in the hospital prior to hitting the lockup the ET has to come out and roll prints the old fashioned way then a car has to hand carry them to 35th Street where a Tech has to hand search the prints. I think that the portable terminal would help expedite the process. I remember then Commander Sobczyk demonstrating them so I know we have/had them at one point.

Posted on June 17, 2010 at 02:11 AM CDT #


Boss,

Would it be possible to just eliminate all these nonsensical,meaningless awards? Attendence awards,parade awards,etc.

This certainly detracts from The Lambert Tree and the like.

I would think you are far too busy with REAL concerns such as the hospital gun-check,the DNA swabbing of P.O.'s guns,manpower shortages,etc.,to be bothered with this award drivel.

Any updates on the DNA-swabbing of P.O.'s guns and hospital gun-check problems?



Posted on June 18, 2010 at 06:53 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The DNA and guns at hospitals were addressed above.  As to the awards, folks have different views on this.  What some find meaningless, others appreciate.  We try to recognize people for going above and beyond what is expected, or by significant acts of excellence.  I do believe in recognizing people for their accomplishments, and not just write it off as "it's your job."  JW



Posted on June 23, 2010 at 07:03 PM CDT #


I was just thinking of a way to slow down all the silly lawsuits and decrease crime. Have the victims of crime sign an affidavit or other such form swearing to the facts of the case. It they refuse to sign, the report is unfounded. If they sign and are proven to have lied they will be arrested and it will be placed on their rap sheet. Then when they try to sue the police at a later date that evidence can be brought forth to show the lack of credibility.

Det. Maxson

Posted on June 18, 2010 at 07:18 PM CDT #


Any word on when a new training bulletin for line-up/show ups? With the in-car computers giving officers access to pictures of suspects, the one-man line-up is frowned upon by detectives and ASAs.

Posted on June 18, 2010 at 07:24 PM CDT #


Boss I agree with you a 100 percent on the chain of command. Requests for chairs, air conditioning and lockers should never be the responsibility of the Supt. of the Chicago Police in a major city like Chicago. However, I don't think you realize on serious work issues that the Chicago Police Department DOES NOT HAVE A CHAIN OF COMMAND. This is something that should be created to resolve all these issues ridiculous as some of them are in order to address the true issues that are inhibiting this department. Until a proper chain of command is established that holds Supervisors accountable for their lack of action on a legitimate request nothing will change.

Posted on June 18, 2010 at 09:01 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will address this at the next command staff meeting; however, the chain of command must run deeper than just through the boys and girls wearing gold stars.  We will do better.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:50 PM CDT #


Boss, why is it that, I, through hard work was given final approval on 7 Department Commendations between the timeframe of 2005-2007, yet have been invited to 1 award ceremony (for 1 of the awards), received 2 more in inter-office mail and have seen nothing on the others. My family really enjoys these ceremonies, and it personally gives me a little bit of a lift when my family sees that I do my job well. This is very frustrating that there is almost no sense of recognition in this department these days. I sincerely doubt that the P.O.s in Special Functions or whomever handles these, are that overworked that they cant clean these up in a timelier fashion. I suggest that if this means putting the "Attendence Awards" and "Presidential Election Awards" on the backburner for a while so be it. A little bit of positive reenforcement for those FEW that are actually out there doing policework might go a long way.

Posted on June 19, 2010 at 10:02 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I feel your frustration.  We are (were) way behind in giving out awards.  We are now having monthly ceremonies, but we must do a better job of recognizing our folks in a TIMELY manner.  Let me see if I can get you a good answer from HR.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:48 PM CDT #


Supt. Weis,
While reading an issue of Law Officer I came across an article which improves officer safety. It is called the Virtual Partner Program. The concept is simple, it involves adding software to our PDT's to allow officers to run plates without having to take their eyes off the subjects in a vehicle. Instead of having to type a vehicle license plate into the computer, an officer tells the computer to run the license plate number. Not only is the computer able to run the license plate but the technology pulls out the important information and relays it to the officer via a computer voice. The officer no longer has to scroll through 5 or 10 pages of leads messages to find vital information. This system allows the officer to keep his eyes on the road and on the subjects in the vehicle he is stopping.

It is also a great citizen PR story, which shows citizens we are on the cutting edge of technology when it comes to fighting crime. The link I am providing has numerous news stories showing the success of the system.
The link is http://www.aps.us/news.html

There is also a pdf link which illustrates some of the features of the voice command system at http://www.aps.us/pdf/APSQuickCommand.pdf

This is a another great system which is helping keep officers safe, I am hoping we could implement here. Thanks for your time. GTC

Posted on June 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This is a terrific idea.  I will direct ISD to look into this.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:14 PM CDT #


Sir,

When are members of the police department 'authorized' to wear their department awards. I understand members of the department wanting to take pride in wearing their department awards. I have observed for example the new crime reduction ribbon and presidential ribbon being worn already however I also know members of the department have not received certificate saying they are authorized to wear them. My personal favorite is when you attend an award ceremony and the officer is already wearing the award he/she is receiving for the first time. This is a trivial topic, but just wondering. It's not clear in any of the G.O. I have read on department awards. Thank you

Posted on June 21, 2010 at 02:03 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have asked HR to look into this and I will post an answer once I receive one from them.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:35 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Per DS O'Keefe:


No one is authorized to wear those ribbons.  The relevant Department Notices – 10-09 (presidential election deployment) and 10-06 (crime reduction) – both state that the Director of CPD HR will determine the timing and procedures for the issuance of the ribbons.  Tracey Ladner has not yet authorized the distribution of either ribbon. In fact, we have not received either ribbon yet nor has HR entered the ribbons into the awards screens.  The crime reduction ribbons should be delivered in about 4 weeks. They are on back order. I will have HR issue a clarification as to the wearing of these awards.



Posted on July 12, 2010 at 03:44 PM CDT #


For the last 6 months or more the 008th District hasn't had the computer program to create District Access cards. We cannot change access levels or give access to our newly assigned officers since at least Nov 09. This is becoming a safety issue. We haven't been able to delete access to personnel that no longer work here. These officers have no access to the lock up or processing room let alone access to the 2nd floor roll call room, locker rooms, etc. without someone else letting them in. We have been told for the last several months that they are working on the program but 7 months is along time to wait. Our inquiries have fallen on deaf ears.

Posted on June 21, 2010 at 03:32 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Six months is ridiculous.  Let me see what the holdup is.  We can do better than this.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:44 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Per DS O'Keefe:  


Midco was at the facility on Wednesday, 7 July starting at 0700 hours to install the new server that has been programmed and to switch over to a Lenel Operating System that is easier to use with more functionality than the Synergy system originally installed. Switching over to a different operating system required the technician to rewire a few components in the 2nd Floor security room. He did replace the lockup touch screen in addition to putting in the new system.  After the above work was completed, the Midco technician provided training on Friday on the new software. 


The delay on the upgrade to the new system was due, in part, to the fact that the system was out of warranty and contracting issues with the firm that installed the system.


 



Posted on July 12, 2010 at 09:36 AM CDT #


Amended carbine order;

what is the point of including that a sgt must be present in order to carry a carbine? we have had the use of force beat into our heads since day 1 at the academy. we know when to use deadly force and when not to. why limit our tools to only when a sgt is present when we are short on sgt's anyways.

can you have the order re-amended again? it already has saved officers lives that i know personally.

thank you.

Posted on June 22, 2010 at 12:23 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Let me look into this and get back to you.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:42 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The Sgt requirement is only for deploying the rifles up front and outside of a gun lock for routine patrol and not in response for an imminent likely need. Also, the gunlock installations on the new Tahoes are supposed to be installed up front now, which should further help to make this less of an issue The individual officers continue to be able to arm themselves at any time that they feel it is warranted and they do not require supervisory approval.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 02:04 PM CDT #


reposted: i never got a response

recently i have been losing many opportunities to do a search warrant. because we don't have any judges available after 10pm. being a city as large as we are, it would be very beneficial to have a judge on call for these things. many times a john doe is willing to help at night, and in the morning, theyre gone. how much influence do you have to get a judge on call?


Posted on June 22, 2010 at 12:27 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for reminding me of this question.  I tasked Legal to do research on this matter and provide me with an answer.  I will check with them in the morning.  This is definitely a "get back."  Thanks again.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:40 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I thought I did answer this.  Please see my response above, dated 6/23/2010, @ 653pm.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:58 PM CDT #


Dear Sir,
Most, if not all, Chicago Police officers are aware of the chain of command and how it is supposed to work. Many who post on this board, myself included, do so because they see it as a direct line to someone who can accomplish important things that due to the bureaucratic nature of such a large organization, would usually take forever to do. When an officer complains of a lack of lockers or working printers, it is probably endemic to the rest of the organization (025 has only 1 larger working printer as I type). This forum would probably gain many viewers and posters if (assuming you are unable to address these posts yourself and with your researchers) you brought others on board to help. No other supe has done this as you pointed out, so you can be the first to improve it.
Sgt. Eric Winstrom #1625

Posted on June 22, 2010 at 08:45 PM CDT #


Why is the BIS requesting a To-From from Detectives who have requested the day off for the 3rd/4th of July (and have requested the day of in advance). The To-From must also include a reason why the Detective is requesting that day off. As if they were going to make the decision by who had the best excuse? It's not really their business why they want to take off, is it? Wasn't there a lawsuit regarding denial of time due to manpower issues?

Posted on June 23, 2010 at 07:28 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

That's a great question for Deputy Superintendent Steve Peterson.  I do know that all administrative considerations for the 3rd and the 4th were run through MLAS.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:08 PM CDT #


What is going on with carbine a - b course qualification? they are no longer available on in-service training? If we have to do it quarterly it would be in the best intrest of the department to have it available to the officers.

Posted on June 23, 2010 at 02:16 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

All good questions.  I will secure an answer for you in the near future.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:38 PM CDT #


Any chance of the City posting LARGE VISIBLE SIGNS on the Lakefront that CLEARLY STATE that the lakefront closes at 11:00 p.m.? Fullerton and LSD has a constant flow of people all night! I've completed multiple city service request forms with no results.

Posted on June 27, 2010 at 03:31 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This is a Park District issue, but I have asked DS O'Keefe to look into this.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:37 PM CDT #


Any staus on LEADS 2000 access from Ted O'Keefe? Having access to photos of offenders, victims and witnesses from S.O.S. drivers license and identifaction cards would greatly assist in investigations.

Posted on June 27, 2010 at 04:13 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

They (ISD) are working on this.  I will have an update early this week.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:41 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Per DS O'Keefe:  


Each Detective Area and many specialized units have had a LEADS 2000 terminal since July, 2006. In addition, each unit that has a terminal has a “LEADS delegate” that could assist the blogger in the event he or she has misplaced his password. These delegates have been trained to facilitate the certification and use of LEADS 2000.  The training and certification for LEADS is available in E-Learning.



Posted on July 12, 2010 at 04:20 PM CDT #


As part of the booking process, can the signatures of arresttees be added? And to take it a step further, have victims sign their reports. That would give detectives working financial crimes access to signatures when assigned forgery cases and the like.

Posted on June 27, 2010 at 04:25 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I asked DS Peterson to give me a response to this.  Will advise once I receive it.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:36 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Per DS Peterson:  Signature alone is not enough to prove a forgery case. A detailed investigation with hand writing exemplars will be needed in addition to the signature. All of which should be obtained by the detectives.



Posted on July 12, 2010 at 04:13 PM CDT #


Sir:
Simple good management tenets include: Correct mistakes, punish wrong-doing. Let the punishment be conmensurate with the wrong-doing. The current activities of IPRA that include exorbitant recommendations for punishment that far exceed the seriousness of the transgressions, the re-opening of investigations from years past, and the Department's support for these activities continue to erode and degrade the morale of a department already in the throes of a morale crisis.
Looking to sound management principles as opposed to attempting to appease small vociferous groups of citizens who make a lifestyle of complaining against the police
would appear to be a better way to display support of the people who actually make this Department work than current practice.

Posted on June 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

One thing I have learned about internal investigations, unless you are a part of that train wreck, or personally observed that train wreck, rarely do you have all of the facts.  To say what punishment is appropriate, and what isn't, requires someone to know every facet of the investigation.  I can tell you that DS Brust argues persuasively with IPRA on may cases, and has been successful in reducing many of the proposed punishments.  However, IPRA is a separate entity, and does not fall under the command and control of the CPD. I do take exception to your claim of "attempting to appease small vociferous groups."  Both IPRA and IAD look at past precedence in trying to arrive at appropriate punishment.  Neither entity is focused on appeasing anyone; they simply want to be fair and consistent, and to the extent possible in personal matters, transparent.  JW 



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 12:59 PM CDT #


Suggestion....
Since we have to punch in and out for court,include the record number, and an ASA has to sign the slip before we are released, how about redesigning the O.T. slip so it includes a box for each one of these?

Posted on June 28, 2010 at 07:59 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I know this is being looked at.  Seems logical. I will pass this to Admin.  Thank you for your suggestion.  JW 



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 12:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent Weis,

I am writing this to comment about the working at the Taste of Chicago. Our Day off was cancelled on Friday 25 Jun 10 which was not bad as far as making extra overtime but my concern is that when we had roll call the bosses there told us that it was going to be a hot and busy day and to keep hydrated. Yes they do have a tent set up were P.O.'s can take a break and get away from the heat. As far as staying hydrated, they only provided drinking water from a water cooler which was empty and also pop which is not going to help to keep hydrated. On one occasion while going to the tent I did see cases of bottled water being unloaded and being put in the command van. My question is why aren't these water bottles being provided to P.O.'s if they are donated or are these water bottles only for the bosses. On this particular day we worked from 0930-2200.



Posted on June 28, 2010 at 09:33 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

For the 3rd and 4th, at the North and South locations, the CFD and Salvation Army, respectively, had their support vehicles in place and were handing out food and drink throughout the day.  Every officer I spoke with had a bottle, or two, of water.  So, from what I personally observed, support was provided to all of the officers, at least at these two venue locations.  As for the support throughout the Taste, water was inside the CP, but officers were grabbing bottles throughout the day.  It appeared there was ample support provided in terms of hydration. JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM CDT #


Posted on March 21, 2010 at 10:22 PM CDT #
Superintendent's Response
I'll ask the JTTF to announce their selection. JW

This was your response on 21 March to a Sgt. that asked about the JTTF application process. I also applied and like many others have heard nothing. Sir. Please, say what you mean and mean what you say. If you had asked JTTF to announce their selection they would have. Today is 28 June, 3 months after your post and still no announcements. With shortages of manpower, vehicles, and morale spiralling downward, the last thing any of us needs is lip service. What all of us craves is very simple - honesty.



Posted on June 28, 2010 at 09:50 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'll speak to Chief Pat Daly and ask him to make the announcement of their selections.  I must say that I'm surprised that you did not speak to Commander Price about these selections after waiting for three months.  Initiative is a desired quality in most positions.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 12:42 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I spoke to Chief Daley. The transfer order with those selected went out over a month ago.  All who were not selected were notified of that decision via e-mail, and Commander Price thanked everyone for their interest.  Therefore, if for some unknown reason you did not receive notification via e-mail, please call Commander Ralph Price and he will explain why you were not selected.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 01:33 PM CDT #


Supt, why are W/C's still required to authorize overtime with their signature. Isn't a notification to appear along with the record number authorization enough. If the officer doesn't appear, he gets deviated. Sounds to me that he is required to go per notification alone and needs no further authorization. Just my feeble opinion.

Posted on June 29, 2010 at 08:46 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

There are many things that we do simply because that is what we have always done.  OT is always a challenge for a department of this size, and we do want the W/C's to be engaged in the process.  However, I will ask that the administrative side of the house take a look at this process to see if we can improve the effiency of it.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on July 11, 2010 at 12:35 PM CDT #


Quick question regarding awards. I recieved approval for a life saving award almost a year ago and still have not recieved any notification for any ceremony nor even been sent the ribbon. I am not saying I need a ceremony but I would like to know why it takes so long to get a ribbon sent out to the members who are out there doing their jobs, recognition is one great tool to keep work alive in any job, not recognizing it breeds contempt and apathy

Posted on June 30, 2010 at 07:41 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'd like to help you, but without knowing who you are, it is nearly impossible.  i would direct you to call DS O'Keefe.  He will be able to get you an answer.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:24 PM CDT #


Just a thought. As a district tactical sergeant, I feel that it is important having an open line of communication with all levels of the department. As you know, the tact teams deal with all types of street level crime, but mostly the tact team's activity centers around illegal narcotics and gang crimes. Much of this criminal activity, especially crimes involving street gangs, carries over district boundaries and in many cases with some street gangs the crimes are citywide. My question is this: the district tactical teams in many cases are the first lines of defense and interaction with the street gangs, why aren't the district tactical team sergeants equipped with Blackberry devices to immediately share and especially receive vital information? The area gang team sergeants have them, the narcotic team sergeants have them, the gun team sergeants have them, why are the tactical team sergeants the last to find out about vital citywide information that may give their tactical officer's the upper hand when dealing with street level crimes? Also, the Blackberries are a great tool for sergeants sharing information on a citywide level. If I am working as a tactical sergeant in the 011th District and a gang homicide occurs in the 015th district, I may not hear about it for quite some time since 011 and 015 don't share the same zone. In a department of Blackberries, seventy-five more devices doesn't seem like a big deal if it opens even more levels of communication at the district level. Thank you for your time.


I think all supervisors should have a blackberry, it is the best way for critical real-time information to be disseminated to supervisors, who in turn can relay the information to the officers in the field or to mobilize officers if needed, I.E. Incident teams; this shouldn't be limited to units or tactical supervisors. will this be possible given the continued decrease in price of blackberry? Also, shouldn't the department use a promotional system similar to L.A. where people can be promoted without a degree? a wage scale system set up by the department with agreement by the unions that allows for promotion without degree at a lesser pay scale? with a bump in pay for each degree attained? it really seems to make sense, we have alot of people who haven't attained degrees that would make great dets, and supervisors, if given the chance; it actually makes a degree more meaningful as well when you receieve a raise for acheiving it and still gives others a chance at promotion. Thank you

Posted on July 02, 2010 at 01:40 PM CDT #


Why doesn't the Medical Section answer the main phone @ 0700 when they are supposedly open? 0740 still no answer. When my Dr. attempted to call them around 1100 (lunch) nobody answered. The Dr. called numerous phone #'s and nobody answered. Shouldn't there always be someone answering the phones during their working hours?

Secondly, the Medical Section is only 1/2 staffed with nurses on Fridays & Mondays so why does the medical section list the nurses fax # on authorization paperwork rather than the main fax #? Again my Dr. faxed a request that sat on my nurses fax machine for two hours because she wasn't working on the day the request was sent.

Also I think it is ridiculous to have to physically report to the medical section one week after having surgery when my stitches haven't been removed yet and I am in a PHYSICIAN prescribed device. The surgery I had & medication I am on does not permit me to drive until the PHYSICIAN gives approval. For a nurse to tell me not to take medication prescribed by a PHYSICIAN so I can drive down there (which I still couldn't drive) is way out of their scope and I do not believe the have the authority to over-ride the instructions of a PHYSICIAN.

A little common sense & discretion is needed. Just my two cents.



Posted on July 05, 2010 at 11:41 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

You raise excellent points.  I will have DS O'Keefe look into these.  I don't know who you are, but DS O'Keefe is very interested in improving the medical section.  Feel free to call him to discuss your issues.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:30 PM CDT #


Sir,
While investigating an armed robbery I discovered the CHRIS system is not drawing all the offender information from the AIRA system as the report goes from Approval complete to Assigned to field status. Ticket # 2078364 was issued to correct this problem but to date there has been no contact from the help desk. Patrol and BIS will have the AIRA report with all of the information but when an attorney subpoenas reports they will receive the Chris report without this offender information. This can cause some uncomfortable moments when we testify and if the original AIRA report is not available during a trial, allegation of prejury. Any chance we can expedite a fix to the chris system and inform BIS and patrol the reports a defense attorney has in court may not reflect the same information as the original AIRA reports?

Posted on July 06, 2010 at 12:39 PM CDT #


Supt, per G.O. we cannot inventory items deemed as perishable. What are we supposed to do with these items that we cannot inventory? I do not want the liability of throwing a prisoner's property into the trash. It would be helpful if the department could offer some guidance on this issue. Thanks.


Posted on July 06, 2010 at 10:28 PM CDT #


Sir, do you know if any explosive detection canine officers will be made in the near future.

Posted on July 11, 2010 at 09:59 PM CDT #


Superintendent,

We are no strangers to the fact that our personal and department vehicles are vandalized in the station lots. We have suffered a tragic loss in one of our lots! What steps is the department going to take, if any, to put restrictions for the general public to access these lots? Why not have the lots where OUR and department vehicles are parked, inaccessible to the public? These lots are used by the public as "shortcuts" and/or to "case" our vehicles! Why not make these lots simply for POLICE only -no trespassing? The CFD does. It is understood that the station itself is open & accessible to the public. But, again, why these parking lots?

Posted on July 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM CDT #


Carbine re-qual is now every 6 months not quarterly anymore. Look up the new GO issued on 02 Jun. there are some good positive changes to the carbine program.

Posted on July 12, 2010 at 02:22 PM CDT #


Supt. Is there any way that you can limit the number of times that any one person can get any special employment for the month. Although I have over thirty years on CPD I have only 10 as a sergeant. As it is now although there are different programs going on at the same time a number of sergeants can work more than 4 days a month while other sergeants get zero. This happens to P/O's as well. If you limit everyone to two days a month it would benefit a larger number of people. The computer program already is set to perform this kind of a task, it just needs to be implemented. Thank You

Posted on July 12, 2010 at 10:28 PM CDT #


Superintendent Weis:

I see that the ball is rolling for the Merit Selection to the rank of Sergeant. So far it appears as though you have kept your word regarding future promotions off of the current lists. I hope that these promotions become a reality. I know we did not meet the number of promotions that you listed in last years Pax 501. Hopefully we can catch-up.

There will be numeous current Sergeants that will choose to move on and retire. God bless those that opt for their well deserved new life.

I hope the decision to promote is done with thought relative to attrition and promotions to other ranks.

Rumors are swirling already and I hope that you, our leader, do what you can to dispel any non-factual information. That is what people expect from this blog.

Please promote an adequate number of Lieutenants and Sergeants. Then allow for promotions to Detective. All of our ranks are short including Police Officers.

Violent crime is out of control. Police Officers as well as citizens are getting hurt and killed. Our officers lack an appropriate number of street supervisors. The citizens of our great city are not afforded the protection and services that they are entiltled to.

Promotions will still keeps boots on the ground and hopefully we will be up in numbers in the near future.

Please help eliminate the suspense by informing the troops of the plans for promotions. I know you have addressed this matter in the past and things depend on budget but it have been quite some time since the last round promotions.

Thank you...

Posted on July 13, 2010 at 06:04 PM CDT #


With the Sergeants merit selection process started will you be able to tell us how many Sergeants you are hoping to promote or will we just have to wait and see?

Posted on July 13, 2010 at 08:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We intend to promote 30 Sergeants in August.  Twenty-one will be by test score; nine will be by the merit selection process.  JW



Posted on August 01, 2010 at 12:59 PM CDT #


Superintendent Weis,

About a year ago, Human Resources offered an application for the Marine Unit as a marine unit officer. I was inquiring about what happened to the rest of the testing process. Was it canceled due to the economic downturn? Are there any plans to restart the testing process in the near future?


Thank you for your time and consideration.


Posted on July 15, 2010 at 08:09 AM CDT #


Dear Supt:

I offer vehicle impoundments should be considered in the, "Performance Based Standards" evaluation process.

Thanks.

Posted on July 18, 2010 at 03:51 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for your idea.  I will pass this to the HR Department for evaluation.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 02:03 PM CDT #


In light of a third Chicago Police office gunned down since May are there any CPD rules against officers having their own two-way police radios for off-duty use? Of course, at their own cost. Since technically we are "always on-duty" and with officers being targeted off-duty the benefit of having a radio would be paramount. Obviously, it puts us in direct contact with the zones instead of depending on a cell phone to go through a 911 calltaker, then to a dispatcher until finally being dispatched. I would gladly pay for this out of my own pocket.

Posted on July 18, 2010 at 12:08 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I do not know if there any prohibitions against having your own radio.  I will check and get back to you.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 02:01 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response


There are several concerns with this suggestion.  One, we have been sued by a group of officers wanting back pay and OT for the issuance of blackberries. I wonder if this would open the door to another law suit. This would be an unfortunate unintended consequence of this option, if we promote it.


Currently there are some "rogue" radios out in the field. By "rogue" I mean they are unauthorized, do not meet Department specs and have no radio system definable ID programmed in. One serious concern I have is that just one of these rogue radios (lost/misplaced/stolen or even if authorized) can bring down a radio zone by simply duct taping the transmit key down.  This would lock up the radio zone until the battery died.



 



If we were to pursue this, the radios would have to be of the same quality as those we issue.  With the cost of such a radio at about $4,000, it is unlikely that many would buy one.  Therefore, the simple answer is no.  JW

 




 



Posted on August 16, 2010 at 04:01 PM CDT #


Dear Supt:

I would like to know why homeless people, many of whom have mental conditions, are allowed to sleep and hang out in front of police stations. I have serious concern about officer safety regarding this matter. I feel it is just a matter of time before we have another incident with one of these individuals which may prove deadly.
Thanks for your attention to this matter.

Posted on July 21, 2010 at 08:29 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Don't quote me on this, but it may be due to the fact that police stations are viewed as a shelter during extreme weather.  I will ask DS Brown to give me a better answer as to why this takes place, and if there are any options for us.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:59 PM CDT #


Sir,
Could you please tell us the status of the polo shirts for the Officers and the Detectives. It would be nice to have them as an option to wear, seeing it's been so hot this summer. It would also be safer for the Detectives because it would eliminate the tie for the summer. The survey you have on-line showed overwhelingly that we prefer the polo. Please let us know the status and push for them for us. We know you like them your always sporting them on the news. The small things like this are appreciated. Thank You....

Posted on July 22, 2010 at 05:46 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This issue sort of died in the uniform committee.  I will see why it died and if it can be brought back to life.  If nothing else, I will secure a definitive answer for you regarding this matter. JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:56 PM CDT #


Sir,
Will the department be making any street/narcotic canine officers in the near future? We have been short for sometime.

Posted on July 25, 2010 at 08:02 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Let me check!  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:57 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response


We filled 5 canine positions on June 1 and we have an open A-form for 3 explosive detection canine handle positions that was available on June 1.  These a-forms were to resolve acting up grievances. I am not aware of any other requests for canine positions since we filled the grant positions. JW




Posted on August 16, 2010 at 03:54 PM CDT #


Could we please eliminate the POWER test requirement for the carbine program? I do not like running. I am not going to run a mile and a half chasing an offender with a carbine. I believe officers should be able to arm themselves with the wonderful technology available with the carbine program. Limiting such technology by requiring officers to meet standards of "fitness" is not practical in my humble opinion. As stated before, I do not like running, but I will shoot against any runner and perform well. This is merely a suggestion to ponder this idea. Thank you for establishing this forum where such ideas can be brought up.

Posted on July 28, 2010 at 08:35 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have directed my staff to look at enhancing the carbine program in terms of training, with the overall goal of improving our readiness for a Mumbai type of attack.  I anticipate your wish coming true, based upon what we are trying to do as a department.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:53 PM CDT #


Dear Supt:

I would like to suggest that the Chicago Police Dept. not be required to respond to ALL CALLS for service. Especially now, since manpower is constantly decreasing with monthly retirements. We routinely go on calls of "Junior not wanting to go to school", among other things not worthy of a police response. Not only does this needlessly tie up patrol vehicles who could be aggressively trying to deter crime, but it's a strain on OEMC. A professional department such as ours deserves better.

Thanks for your consideration.

Posted on July 28, 2010 at 06:39 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are currently working on a project with the OEMC that will reduce the number of calls that we respond to.  Chicago leads the country, or at least the major cities, with the percentage of 911 calls that we respond to.  If we can reduce that number, we will effectively add additional officers to the streets.  I apologize that I do not have a date when I anticipate rolling this out; however, it is being worked on as we speak.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:50 PM CDT #


In a related question to the number of sergeants being promoted post, can you tell us how many lieutenants you intend to promote as well?

Thank you.

Posted on August 02, 2010 at 08:34 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

As of this date and time, we intend to promote 30 lieutenants; twenty-one based upon test score and nine based upon merit nominations, sometime in September 2010.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:47 PM CDT #


Superintendent,
Once again the Department has anounced that they will be taking nominations for meritorious promotion. And once again, unless you have clout, you are shut out of the process. I think we are all resigned to the fact that merit promotions are here to stay. What we are not resigned to is the process whereby good quality people are left out of the process because they don't "know" someone. I seem to recall that it was your intention to update this process whereby anyone qualified could apply for the merit nomination. Why are we still mired in this clout influenced, lawsuit inducing process?

Posted on August 02, 2010 at 11:08 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

As I have said on numerous occassions, I fully intend to make this process as open as possible.  We have announced who was promoted meritoriously.  We would like to add who nominated those promoted.  However, we can not eliminate the "nomination process" until we have a new test, and thereby allow all applicants to receive the same standard protocol for the process.  It's on my "to do list," but it will not be done until we undergo a future promotional examination.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:45 PM CDT #


This question is about a promotion to lieutenant. I have taken and passed the LT's test four times: What does it take for a sergeant with more than twenty years in rank and a total of 29+ years in service, with a AAS and a BA degree, and a graduate of Northwestern's traffic institute, to get promoted to the rank of lieutenant? I have managed to keep a marriage for more than 30 years and have grown college grad children. I have also managed to stay healthy and a full head of hair. I am also proud of my 32 inch waist. I have been in 9 different units including HQ. There has to be a way. Please do not tell me I have to be nominated. Thanks, Boss.

Posted on August 04, 2010 at 09:16 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

With 29+ years of service, you know the drill.  Test scores are the easiest way because it is the most straight-forward; if your score is above the cut-off, you are promoted, period.  The merit process requires you to be nominated.  I hope you scored high enough so merit is a none-issue.  But if you did not, I sincerely hope someone recognizes your potential for advancement.  Good luck!.  JW



Posted on August 09, 2010 at 01:40 PM CDT #


Dear supt. I have recently read a memo from the Bureau of Patrol dated 22 July 10 concerning supervisors using Tahoes. I am a Sgt on midnights that works a very busy District and rifle certified. A while ago you stated you wanted as many M4's on the street as possible. Well this new rule kind of limits that statement. There are a couple of Sgts that are qualified where I work, and now cant deploy them under this new rule beacause the Tahoes have the rifle racks. Maybe you can re word the memo allowing certified Sgts to use the Tahoes. Especially since I can pull into the lot at any time and find aprox 4-5 Tahoes sitting the entire night, not being used.. Thanks for your time

Posted on August 04, 2010 at 11:39 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I think we have the ability to outfit the sector cars with gun locks, if there are sgts qualified.  If you send in your name to DS O'keefe, see if he can help you out.  I would take care of this for you, but i do not have your name.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:33 PM CDT #


With the Lieutenant's merit selection process started will you be able to tell us how many Lieutenants you are hoping to promote or will we just have to wait and see?

As open and foward as you have been by naming those promoted meritoriously, why has the rank listing never been made available to the Sergeants or the C.P.S.A.? Short of guessing, there is no way to know how far down the list we are. Who in Personnel could help answer this?

Posted on August 05, 2010 at 08:41 AM CDT #


Just curious - when will the "Department Organization" section of CLEAR be updated with pictures of the latest members of the Command Staff? It would be nice to recognize a "boss" when I see him/her. Some of the pictures have been blank for months.

Posted on August 05, 2010 at 03:58 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

So many things to do.  I agree with you, this is sheer madness.  I will ensure we do this soon.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:35 PM CDT #


Dear Supt. I would like to know if you intend to promote any P.O.s to Detecive anytime soon. Seeing that you are you requesting meritotious Sergent and Lietenant applications. It would be nice to see a Detective class soon since there has not been one since 2007. Thank you Sir.

Posted on August 05, 2010 at 09:24 PM CDT #


Alright, I can remain silent no longer. Stop complaining about needing to take the POWER test to carry the carbine. People are complaining nonstop about running 1.5 miles. This is embarrassing and shameful. If you cannot run 1.5 miles then you shouldn't be the police at all. This must be the only job where you are not required to maintain any level of competence in the skills required to perform the duties involved. We are the police, and it stands to reason that we should be required to maintain a minimal level of fitness. You are not being asked to run a marathon, deadlift 500 pounds, or do 1000 crunches. The standards as they stand are ridiculously low to begin with, and to hear people whine about those standards is incomprehensible. I won't go beyond the scope to address the issue of our substandard firearm qualification program, but it is on par. Stop whining, put on a pair of sweats and your ipod, and go for a jog.

Posted on August 06, 2010 at 08:22 AM CDT #


I recently suggested that the department charge more money for case reports as a way to increase revenue. I have an idea that may be utilized by the department members to give informants or citizens their phone number for contact. This is an added saftey factor for our officers since the number cannot be traced back because its being forwarded to their actual number via computer. Gmail has a free system in place that allows a gmail.com user to designate a phone number which can be routed to a cell or land line. This system has its own voice mail, ability to answer the phone or send to voice mail when a caller is calling the phone number that you assign. This may eliminate the need for department issued cell phones to officers and cut costs as well. A tutorial is available on gmail itself.
#19638

Posted on August 07, 2010 at 02:13 PM CDT #


Dear Sir, First, Festival Cubano was a huge success for the Department, and is an excellent model for us to use in the future for large festivals. A proactive approach to confronting gang members from square one helped us win the support of the attendees. In regards to the sergeant with 29+ years on the Department, why is it a contract violation to change the merit nomination process? Are not those positions filled by management? The process is absolutely unfair and should be a priority to fix before any other merit promotions are made. As far as listing who nominated the merits, you and I both know that those names often go far above the nominators themselves. Will a Deputy who instructs a commander to nominate someone also be added? I am saddened that a 29 year veteran would receive a response from this board that implies the administration is a bystander to the broken system it administers. Also, I am still interested in a response to my complaints regarding vehicles, SPARS and CRs. At the least I'd like to see them posted so that if other Department members have ideas they can share them with me.
Sgt. Eric Winstrom #1625

Posted on August 09, 2010 at 07:40 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I don't agree with you that the process is unfair.  I can tell you it is far more transparent and fair than it was 32 months ago.  What i am working on is for everyone who is eligible to be able to put themselves in play.  With thousands of potential applicants for 9 positions, there has to be some filters in place to carve the final competitors to a reasonable number.  But, i think we can do some things different to allow everyone who wants to be considered to submit, and to at least receive feedback as to why their quest ended with their commander.  This i will work on until my last day in the department, that's a promise. jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:43 PM CDT #


Sir,
There was a recent order that was just issued regarding the taping of witnesses during an (homicide) investigation. Since the only location to tape witnesses is the secured area where we also tape homicide offenders (Area One), are there plans have a dedicated area to conduct these taped interviews? Possibly an area that includes a desk and chair instead of the the five by five room with a bench and an area that does not further intimidate already reluctant witnesses. Thanks

Posted on August 10, 2010 at 09:33 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I am not aware of any such plans, but I will have facilities look into this.  It seems reasonable that if we are taping more people, we would need more space with this capability.  Excellent point - thank you.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:40 PM CDT #


Dear Mr. Superintendant, you have stated on the blog that you intend on promoting 30 sergeants in august and 30 lieutenants in september. With all do respect sir, when do you plan on promoting detectives?? There has not been a detective class in over 2 yrs !!!!

Posted on August 11, 2010 at 03:33 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are debating this issue with the Office of Budget as we speak.  I do not decide on how many detectives to promote.  We have to justify every promotion we desire; that is the fun of working with a $650M shortfall.  But, I do hope to have a class of detectives in the near future.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:33 PM CDT #


Will the department be making any explosive detection canines in the near future?

Posted on August 11, 2010 at 11:48 AM CDT #


I want to thank you for your expansion of technogogy along with the use of tasers/m-4's, however, when it comes to a taser running out of power and or breaking, thats it, you wont see a new one to replace it.As a Dept. , we have a history of this issue being a problem, we start off in the right direction, and then the city doesnt pay the bill, and or the city will not replace or fix problems with the equipment. This is also the case with gymnasium equipment, guys/gals that work out, are frustrated to see the newer equipment in the newer districts fall into disrepair, only to be told by the district managers that there is no one to fix the broken equipment....again Iam a 15 year veteran, and I think you have implemented many new ideas that are very positive, i can only pray that we keep heading in a positive direction.

Posted on August 11, 2010 at 02:33 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We all too often forget about the PM of our equipment.  I will work with the BAS and the BPS to ensure we keep our items up to speed.  It would help if you could identify your district to start the evaluation of the gym equipment.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:22 PM CDT #


Dear Sir,
Another day of no unmarked pool cars, and not enough cars here to man the units needed. 015 is in the same boat, since they inquired today if we had any to lend. I facetiously ask, do the numerous people working at 35th Street with take-home cars share the same issue as those of us in patrol?
Sgt. Eric Winstrom #1625

Posted on August 12, 2010 at 02:51 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

You would be better served, as a leader, to look at solving the problem, rather than sending me cute comments. Pck up the phone, call DS O'Keefe, and see if he can help you.  That's your job, that's why you're a sergeant.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:54 PM CDT #


Hello,
I see that the department will be training 30 new Sgts. and 30 new Lts. This in my opinion is a wash and with many Sgts. retiring soon the districts will just be short. I am wondering how many more Sgts the dept. will be taking off the list? They have not even made 150 off the current test. How long will the current test be good for?

Thank you

Posted on August 12, 2010 at 09:15 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

the sheer cost of the test will continue its life into next year.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:51 PM CDT #


Promote 30 sgt's and 30 lt's = -30 patrolmen, same amount of sgt's and 30 new lt's. I am glad we are promoting again don't get me wrong but without hire more police we are still losing ground.


Please leave one lt in each area. There is no need for an svu and rbt lt. It is a waste of a lt, an office, and take home car. All things are run from the sgt and the commander. Any lt telling you different just wants to keep his spot. That's 10 extra lt's that could be used in patrol. Keep one lt in each area to assist the commander.

Posted on August 13, 2010 at 09:49 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

There is no doubt that we need to look at how we allocate resources.  I have asked the exact question and received conflicting answers.  I will have Operations give me a definitive position on this.  Excellent point.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:48 PM CDT #


Can the detectives assigned to the academy conduct some roll call and other training? The new training bulletin is great and much needed. Maybe bring in the tact teams and give guidance on follow-up investigations and such.

Posted on August 13, 2010 at 09:53 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

They should be doing that.  I will have DS Brust address this and see if we can do a better job.  Thank you for the great idea.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:37 PM CDT #


When will detective's get promoted ??????????????????????????????/

Posted on August 14, 2010 at 03:12 AM CDT #


Superintendent,
The Automated Contact Card program was a good idea, but it doesn't work. There are multiple glitches in the system that make it impossible to enter them in the car. That means that I have to hold myself down in the station to enter them. This is really a waste of manpower time. Even in the station, it seems, every night between the hours of 2300 and 0200 the system won't even boot up. I'm walking around with contact cards from three weeks ago, that I still haven't caught up with. Then, my activity reflects inacurately, and the resource value is lost.
One of my co workers even called the help desk to get assistance, but they were unable to help. They related the problem had been fixed, but to my knowledge there has been no change.

Posted on August 14, 2010 at 06:19 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I know this is broken.  We are working on a fix that will self-populate many of the fields.  With a computer, you should only have to enter data once.  I will have the BAS give everyone an update of where we are at with tech upgrades.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:46 PM CDT #


Does the Superintendent plan on having any more "town hall" type meetings? If yes, when? I understand he has a busy schedule but how about putting it on his schedule.

Posted on August 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I may after the weather turns cold.  We have been busy over the summer months, but if there is a desire, i will try to fulfill that need.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:30 PM CDT #


Do you think it would be possible to add a promotee's rank number with the promotional order so that we could keep track of where we are on the list? As it stands now we have to call F.O.P. everytime to determine where we are at after every promotion.

Posted on August 17, 2010 at 02:19 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Off the cuff, I do not see why this would be a problem.  Give me a few days and i should have a better answer for you.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:36 PM CDT #


Sir,

I have a comment and a question on the new predictive analysis strategy that has been put in place. Is there an order due out to outline the guidlines for patrolling these areas? I have been told that if a shooting occurs in that area that the GPS of the cars assigned will be checked for possible disciplinary action. I know that some of these areas assigned, based on predictive analysis are not in "hotspots." Clearly with the limited manpower we now have based on retirements and budget restrictions, should we not be concentrating on these hotspots. One of the most recent areas of patrol designated for saturation by predictive analysis was a two block square area comprised of prairie. Please looking for clarification. Thank you in advance for what I know will be a timely response

Posted on August 17, 2010 at 03:08 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Predicitve Analytics is not the panacea for crime fighting.  It is a tool that helps identify certain indicators that are indicative of future crime.  In a simple word, it is math.  For it to be effective, we need the information that you just mentioned.  For example, if we analyze an area for leading indicators, and these show that there is a higher probability for violence at location X, that is based upon several years worth of data.  However, if a month ago, the liquor store on the corner of this hypothetical location, was voted close, that might have been the primary driver of the violence.  Having that information can alter the hotspots.  So, here is what I would like you to do.  If you see some evidence that would suggest are calculations are in error, please pass that on to the Predictive Analytic folks so they can factor that into their violence equation.  Intelligence is derived from many sources; the more sources usually leads to more accurate intelligence.  At the end of the day, all of our jobs will be easier if we have solid intelligence that allows for accurate deployment of resources.  We truly can do more with less, which, based upon the fiscal situation of Chicago, is a paradigm we must embrace.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:26 PM CDT #


Was the fleece ever approved as an official uniform item?

Posted on August 18, 2010 at 01:21 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Soon, very soon.  Minor issues with rank ensignia.  Before the first freeze.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:16 PM CDT #


Just adding to another question about our checks,check stubs, W-2s, or any document with my/our private info being left in the open, in a bin on the front desk for anyone to see our personal information. Can we get some changes to this. I've been on this job for nearly 20 years and have been hurt badly by this process. Back in the early 90's before you were here a (fellow officer-sarcasm) in the 007 dist took my and several other officers info, applied for loans and credit cards, and made purchases with my info leaving me and others with debts and bad credit. Yes he was finally arrested and terminated from this job, but my credit was and still is screwed thanks to this process of leaving private info in the open. Can you help with some way to make this more secure? and please don't respond use the chain of command because this has been already tried for several years from Sgt. Lts. W/cs and D/Cs with no remedy.

Posted on August 18, 2010 at 12:19 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This is an excellent idea.  I will see if these could be sent electronically to you; however, I believe these are generated by another city agency, so that might stop this from happening.  But, i will get back to you when I have a definitive answer.  Good idea.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:14 PM CDT #


I have enjoyed the Superintendent Speaker Series. However, I cannot attend all of the speakers I would like to see due to conflicts during the day. Is there anyway you can get your speakers to speak on third watch?

Posted on August 21, 2010 at 05:56 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We are somewhat at the mercy of when the speakers are available.  We are working on video taping the training so that it can be seen via the Internet.  I hope this will be in place before the end of the year.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:11 PM CDT #


Superintendent,
I would like to make a comment on members of the Chicago Police Department bashing other members(Exempt's to P.O's) to the media. I believe we are a big family and we shouldn't go outside our family to address our problems. This is a great department supported together by great members! We deal with civilians and the media bashing us everyday on the street, paper and t.v. The last thing we need is a department/family member bashing us thru the media. We are a HUGE department(family) with strong personalities and we never said we're perfect but when one of us are down, there is always a CPD member there to pick us up!!!! I am proud to be a CHICAGO police officer and to work with the best police officers in the world!!! Superintendent, keep up the good work, and I got your back my brother!!

Posted on August 24, 2010 at 08:00 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Well said.  No organization is perfect, and one as large as CPD will never have all of its members happy.  But everyone should be proud of this profession.  You are in a unique position to make a difference in the lives of others everyday.  That will give you more satisfaction than anything else you may experience.  thank you for expressing your pride in being a CPD officer.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:46 PM CDT #


Superintendent Weis, I wanted to take the time to thank you very much for all that you do and have done for the City of Chicago and the Police Department. As I read the different comments, Officers tend to do too much complaining as oppose to being grateful for what they have. For example, you could not have a job like a lot of Americans don't even though they have masters & doctorate degrees, they are living off of their savings account, trying to feed their babies, and just dealing with a lot of unknown. Police Officers in Chicago do not face lay offs, but yet they do a lot of unnecessary whining. These are difficult times that we are living in, too many citizens are wayward and disrespectful not just to the police but to each other. The solution does not rest with more police, although it would help, but with providing social skills to people who are lacking it. I just wanted to say "thank you for being our Superintendent if no one else has told you, I'm glad you came here". No one remembers the good things you are doing and have done, instead negativity seems to be the way of life.

Again thank you so much and I hope that you stay on with us. P.S. there are others that feel the same way.

Posted on August 26, 2010 at 08:51 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will be forever grateful to have been given the opportunity to serve all of the officers of this department and the residents of this city.  I have had the privilege to work and live in many cities over the past 50 years, and I truly believe Chicago is the best.  I have also been efforded the opportunity to work with police officers from many cities and departments, and there are no finer than those of the CPD.  We have done some good things over the past 32 months, but there are many additional opportunities to improve the department and provide more to the working men and women who make us what we are.  jw



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 03:52 PM CDT #


Superintendent,

Is there any hope of a detectives class being made in the near future since there has been a sergeant class made just recently?
Any information would be greatly appreciated.





Posted on August 27, 2010 at 12:35 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I am optimistic that we will have a detecives class.  It has been nearly three years - that is too long.  I do not have a number that will be approved, but I do think we will see some detectives be promoted this year.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:08 PM CDT #


Hello Supt.
There is an on-going problem with the Benelli shotguns assigned to the Area 5 Detective Division and I want to get the word out in the event this is going on across the city. There is a Sgt and several Detectives walking around with lacerations to the foreheads due to the rear sights of the shotguns coming off and striking the shooter in the head while the shotgun is being fired. This is a major safety concern and needs to be addressed before someone loses an eye! There have been (3) incidents in the last (10) days and atleast another (5) incidents over the last couple months. Also, just imagine if a CPD member is engaged in a fire fight on the street and obviously would NOT have eye protection on and the rear sight strikes him or her in the eye; this may become tragic! Thanks for any consideration given to this safety issue!

Posted on August 29, 2010 at 12:13 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

These are in the process of being fixed.  Very odd design flaw, but Benelli is fixing these.  We hope to have the correction made in the very near future.  JW



Posted on September 24, 2010 at 02:06 PM CDT #


will you please ask supervisors to ensure officers are in full uniform when working special employment? recently there was an officer with approx. 3.5 years on the job working special employment with no duty belt, just a gun and pepper spray. what a huge safety concern for fellow officers!!!! yes, there is a shortage of inspectors, but supervisors should then step up to the plate. i hate to see what this officer wears while working on the street.
thank you

Posted on August 29, 2010 at 06:53 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Excellent point.  Supervisors need to supervise.  Holding the line on what the uniform of the day is should be standard protocol.  I will pass this along to DS Brown to ensure this is done.  JW



Posted on September 20, 2010 at 01:20 PM CDT #


Can you explain why we must send working Police Officers to take cars to grease and oil and they are down for hours waiting to get waited on, why cant the desk personnel or light duty take cars in for scheduled Grease and Oil and let the officer maintain beat integrity.

Posted on August 31, 2010 at 08:42 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This is a good question.  I would suggest you take that up through your chain of command.  I think the district is in a better place to provide an answer than me.  JW



Posted on September 20, 2010 at 01:18 PM CDT #


Supt., I am just a Police Officer. The only thing I would request is a vehicle out of roll call, preferably one with a working computer. I can not do my job ie(respond to calls for service, conduct traffic stops, assist other officers or agencies) without a vehicle. I actually still do enjoy my job, however, I can not do it without the proper tools. I am not concerned with all of the other political issues. They do not affect my day to day. Just give me a car so I can do my job. Thanks for your time & consideration in this matter.
Just a P.O........

Posted on August 31, 2010 at 09:02 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I know cars are a problem.  Assuming you are in the BOP, we will have all new beat cars, as well as vehicles for Rapids before the end of the year.  I agree with you 100%; without wheels, there isn't too much we can expect of you.  Hang in there - cars are coming in daily.  JW



Posted on September 20, 2010 at 01:13 PM CDT #


As a Sergeant, there are only so many ways to motivate your officers, but one of the key ways to do such is by putting them in for awards. In my time as a sergeant, I have learned that this is one of the most important things to officers, although some may not like to admit, everyone likes to be acknowledged for a job well done. However, it has become increasingly frustrating to me that when the effort is put in at the Sgt. and Lt. levels to submit deserving awards, they sit in some approval inboxes for MONTHS. Some as simple as a Department Commendation, I have noticed that are still pending one step up from a Commander since February. Superintendant Weis, could you please ask for some higher level bosses on the department to either approve or even reject if they deem the award is inappropriate.

Posted on September 01, 2010 at 12:02 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We have instituted an automated system in which supervisors will be sent a message when there are awards to be approved in their que.  Hopefully, that will improve the process.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 03:43 PM CDT #


I am currently in school and I am wondering if there can be an option for officer's to work part time or else take unpaid furlough days. Of course, this will be only on a temporary until school is completed.

Posted on September 02, 2010 at 01:03 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

As much of a fan that I am of continuing eduation and training, I have to say no to your question due to the fact that we are short-handed.  It wouldn't be prudent to allow people to take time off when we are looking at every possible option to put more officers on the street.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 03:36 PM CDT #


Just felt it was important to post re: the meeting with gangs. Everyone is jumping on the bandwagon to say how bad of an idea it was. Actually, we did similar things before and the message was clear. The thugs can have all the press conferences they want but it wont minimize the fact that they are thugs that break the law, period! Sometimes you have to think outside the box and that is exactly what that meeting was. 19638

Posted on September 02, 2010 at 02:07 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you.  It didn't seem like a bad idea, especially when it has been successful in many other cities.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 03:33 PM CDT #


Will we be having a power test or carbine training program any time soon for those of us who have been waiting??????

Posted on September 05, 2010 at 09:09 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

POWER test is a thing of the past for the carbine program.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 03:32 PM CDT #


Superintendent Weis,

I have been submitted three times for merit promotion to Dective and three times for merit promotion to Sergeant. I have not been successful. I have a Masters Degree from The Adler School of Professional Psychology in Police Psychology. I am a twenty-one year veteran and have made the following arrests; 552 Felony arrests, 37 classiffied as classx, 740 misdemeanor arrests, 449 other arrests for a total of 1,741 arrests and 160 vehicle impounds. I have received 124 department awards and 10 letters of commendation. I would like to know what criteria I need to meet and add to my resume in order to achieve a promotion. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank You, Officer William G. Moriarty #6316

Posted on September 06, 2010 at 07:54 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

All candidates are reviewed based upon the dimensions of Adaptability, Attention to Detail, Initiative, Interpersonal Relations/Objectivity, Judgment/Decision Making/Problem Solving, leadership/mentoring, Oral Communication/Listening, personal Integrity/Professional Orientation & Commitment, Stress tolerance, Work Direction/Planning and Organization and Written Communication and other Characteristics/Qualifications.  It is important to articulate examples of what the problem was, what you specifically did, and what the result was Being able to show the impact of what you did is critical.  You have to separate yourself from the other candidates who also have significant experience and accomplishments.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 03:31 PM CDT #


Below is my original question and your response. They have put one class in the academy already and did not use any of these people. Can you find out if there is a reason that they will not hire these people? Rumor has it that the list for hiring is exhausted. Thanks


Seeing as though the department is down a significant amount of manpower, why don't we utilize the hundreds of applications of officers that have left the job for some reason and are seeking to return. The city tells them that they can come back but Human Resources has the applications in a drawer. These are officers that were not granted Leaves of Absence but were forced to resign.. One example of this is people switching to the Chicago Fire Department. I believe that the last person allowed to return to work after resigning was a lieutenant who just recently retired as an Inspector. These people that want to return could be retrained in a very short period of time therefore alleviating some of our manpower shortage before summer.

Posted on March 31, 2010 at 11:43 PM CDT #




Superintendent's Response
I agree with you 100 percent. The issue is funding for the officers we hire. Due to the city's fiscal position, we have not been allowed to hire a class YTD. You make a valid point and this is something we can look into if, and when, we receive the green light to hire folks. JW



Posted on September 08, 2010 at 05:34 PM CDT #


Why can't 'Automated Directives' be accessed through E-Learning? Since E- Learning is accessible from non-department computers it would be nice to have the ability to read General Orders, Special Orders and so on, from the comfort of my home. This could help in studying for future promotional exams.

Posted on September 08, 2010 at 06:12 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Great idea!  I will see what has to be done to make that happen.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 09:27 AM CDT #


Sir, I and other P/O's still dont have the 2004 crime reduction award in our complimentary history. I know this might be a non-issue problem but I dont feel comfortable wearing the ribbon if its not listed in my history. I gaurantee majority of the department officers that were working that year still dont have them in there history. I have called Human resource and they told me to call personnel, I called personnel and they told me "dont worry, If you were employed in 2004 you can wear the ribbon and put it on your resume, no one will make you take it off. Is there a way or someone I can call directly to have this award added? Thanks!

Posted on September 09, 2010 at 08:14 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will direct the HR Department to remedy this situation.  I apologize for the delay; six years after the fact is ridiculous.  Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.  JW



Posted on September 13, 2010 at 09:24 AM CDT #


I just want to say thanks for instituting this blog, I have posted several times, and was pleased to find a response. When I tell people I post on here and get a response they seem surprised. Unfortunately too many people are scared to post on the blog, but I believe if you want to know something ask! Thanks again!

Posted on September 14, 2010 at 08:39 AM CDT #


RIght now my fellow brothers and sisters are beginning form a protest aimed at you. I'm here to tell you are not wrong. Do not back down from this. Stay focused and strong and complete what you started to do. The same people that bitch are teh same people who do not do anything anyway. Also the same people who are angry that they did not get what others get. Cry babies. I believe in you

Posted on September 15, 2010 at 08:54 AM CDT #


Lets create the rank of corpral for the patrol division (d2a) pay and make the rank of Detective are career service rank let detectives have their own bargaining agent. This would allow two different paths to become a sgt etc. The military has done for 50 years it works.

Posted on September 15, 2010 at 09:07 AM CDT #


Sir,

Why in the 007th District has the charging system for the Tasers been removed? Us beat officers on Midnights are given Tasers that do not have a full charge. I have been personally handed a Taser that was at 38%. Isn't that a bit of a safety issue as well as pointless to have a weapon that doesn't function properly or will only function once if I am lucky?

Posted on September 15, 2010 at 02:21 PM CDT #


Superintendent,
I believe that most of the working police are at worst indifferent to you and the policies you have implemented being focused, as they are, on work and doing some of it. I believe that the very vocal malcontents would be malcontented no matter who was the Supe and what policies were implemented being focused, as they are, on rationalizing not doing work. You do seem to have a special gift for drawing their ire. My compliments. Thank-you for all you have done. Keep doing the right thing and "DAMN THE TORPEDOES...!"

Please re-institute the POWER Test requirement for the Carbine if for no other reason because I enjoyed reading the complaints of all the Rangers, SEALS and Marine Recon snipers who can't run a mile and a half.


Posted on September 15, 2010 at 06:42 PM CDT #


Sir,

For those of us who work the 10 hr day on the third watch, is it possible to have the hours adjusted? Why not a 1400-0030 or 1500-0130? Working until 0200 and 0300 discourages officers from being proactive. How? I am going to court tomorrow (today) at 0900, after leaving work (if I leave on time) at 0300. If I get lucky, I will be in bed and trying to sleep at 0400. Get up at 0730 to get ready for court on 3.5 hours of sleep. Not only is this unhealthy, it's dangerous. I hope this is considered and you bring it to Commander Ball's attention in 005 to start.

Posted on September 16, 2010 at 12:15 AM CDT #


Hello Superintendent, A few years ago our department was suppose to become a paperless department. We seemed to be producing more paper now than before. Every pay period there are check stubs printed and for the most part most members do not take their stubs. My suggestion is, the members who have direct deposit should be able to access their stubs via e-learning, this way they could print out their stubs at home if they need them. There are times that we need the stubs and then we should be able to print them. This would save a lot of paper and garbage.

Posted on September 16, 2010 at 02:36 PM CDT #


supt.
why did the civilian who was in charge of the movie detail get replaced with an evidence technician? why are we taking more officers off the street? shouldn't that position have been replaced with a civilian? also, shouldn't civilians be in charge of special employment? why are we using full-duty officers to work inside? wouldn't their skills be better used on the street? especially now when other inside units have had to send officers back to districts.

Posted on September 16, 2010 at 07:36 PM CDT #


I am pleased that the Carbine Operator course now has no phusical restriction. However, I am curious as to how many clases will be had before years end. With the mass number of people I foresee signing up. Also how will people be choosen for the class? Will it be based on Rank? Seniority? I see two classes have been added. One for this week and one for the week of 27 Sept 2010. Will they continue to have weekly classes. Thank you for your time.


Posted on September 22, 2010 at 07:00 AM CDT #


I suggest that you let all training be on e-learning so an officer can sign up at home on his off time. Carbinr course sign up is only on clear system not e-learning. Being on furlough it is frustrationg not being able to sign up for the only two classes being offered. This should be for all deployment requests, movie detail, special, safe city, exc...

Posted on September 22, 2010 at 07:16 AM CDT #


What is your opinion on altering or eliminating the mandatory retirement age of 63?

Posted on September 22, 2010 at 11:08 AM CDT #


Mayor Daley said the CAPS offices are filled with to many police officers. He also stated that the CAPS program was intended to be more community/civilian run. Can you assign the District Managers to this position and free up 50 sergeants for patrol duties? We already employ a District Managers in every district; this would only add a small increase in their duties and it would be money well spent on two fronts, more patrol sergeants a use of the District Managers. Thank you for your time. Additionally, it would a money saver for the city.

Posted on September 22, 2010 at 01:04 PM CDT #


Any idea of what is going to happen to the districts which are still currently in the alternative work schedule program? I am in a district which is in the six days on and three days off and we have not heard anything about the schedule for 2011 yet... sorry if youve already addressed this topic above.

Posted on September 22, 2010 at 08:16 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

In regards to the work schedules, the Department is currently in arbitration with the union on this matter.  The next scheduled hearing is 8 October 2010. Obviously, we hope for a decision soon.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:31 PM CDT #


Boss,

I just took the two-day Active Shooter course, and this was the best training I've received on this job so far, hands down! The staff was awesome, and the scenarios really opened my eyes to the circumstances of everyday reality. Unfortunately, two days is not enough. Will this course ever be extended?

Posted on September 23, 2010 at 02:22 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

We can certainly look into this.  Due to the fact that there is such a demand for this training, I prefer more courses to train as many folks as possible.  But, I will mention this to the Training Academy.  Thank you.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:42 PM CDT #


Superintendent,
I've heard that the Department has (sometime in the past) had Gordon Graham provide a Risk Management seminar(s). Every person I've spoken to raves about his program and I've eagerly awaited any indication we may have him as our guest again. Are there any plans for this in your speaker series?

Posted on September 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM CDT #


Why can't transfer bids let you know the watches that they have available (like sgts do)? It would be helpful to know where the openings are because many of us are limited to the watches we are available if our spouse works, etc.

Posted on September 26, 2010 at 06:51 PM CDT #


Sup,
I realize that 30 Lts and 30 Sgts were recently promoted. I also know you do not have final say on promotions, But I am near on the list. can you give me an educated guess if the lt list will remain active into next year? any insight will help. thank you

Posted on September 26, 2010 at 10:11 PM CDT #


B&A has been decimated of many of the Detectives. Why not just assign the B&A Detectives to the Areas and send the the Explosive Techs to SWAT. Saves money by consolidating units. It was done with the Auto Detectives.

Posted on September 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM CDT #


Use of Force question/comment - can you look into revising the requirement to complete a TRR when the spark on the Taser is displayed? Displaying the spark is VERY effective, e.g. helps to quickly disperse a crowd, encourages a combative offender to enter the squad without having us to assist said offender into the squad, etc. Having said that, displaying the spark helps us to control situations where we would have to get our "hands" on offenders or hostile crowds, etc. Thank you.

Posted on September 27, 2010 at 01:08 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I understand your position, but we ask that you fill out a TRR to protect you from law suits.  If you make no record of "sparking" a taser, the device itself will have a record that it was discharged.  If the battery of the device was obtained through subpoena, it would show a discharge and you would have no record to refute the claim that you shocked someone.  So, while I admit it's more work, it does protect you, which is my goal for everything that I do.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 05:00 PM CDT #


Good morning,

I am writing this comment to express my dismay as to the assignment of newly promoted sergeants in relation to posted openings for incumbent sergeants. The issue that I have is that newly promoted sergeants were assigned just prior to the intra-district bids being posted. Now, these brand new supervisors will have an opportunity to lock in their district and watch. As a result,those openings will not be subject to a citywide bidding process. Incumbent sergeants who might like to transfer out of their district will not have an opportunity to do so. While one might argue that these incumbent sergeants have had ample opportunity to bid out on previous posted vacancies, this is simply not the case. For the past several periods where sergeant vacancies were to be posted, none were listed, or at most two in far south side districts. This despite the fact that there were many bid spots that were available citywide. This is inherently unfair and should be addressed and remedied.

Posted on September 27, 2010 at 09:06 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The new sergeants were assigned based upon departmental needs.  I don't know what else to tell you.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 02:21 PM CDT #


Sir, From an economic view, I believe it would be most cost effective if PO and Detectives are allowed to work a tour of duty to supplemnt manpower. As you are aware, it takes about a year to train a PO for the street. In addition we are losing a 100 plus a year through retirement etc. Some districts have done this in the past. The airport does it now.

Posted on September 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM CDT #


Suerintendent,
I am glad to see that all member can qualify and carry a carbine now that the policy has changed. It is another step forward in our department that was available years ago but for some reason stopped. The one thing I still ask is why shotguns cannot be utilized in the same way. Personally owned and allowed to carry if qualified. My biggest reason for this as a Detective is our roles and situations differ. Search warrants, fugitive apprehensions and such. Our situations usually arise in close qurters or in residences. The shotgun is a much better tool. I also have listened to many patrol officers who are more comfortable with a shotgun than a carbine. Years ago the Department allowed police officer with either one of their choice. Political correctness I think brought an end to that. As far as department shotguns, the Remingtons are good weapons, but not as degigned with a full length barrel and they are definately not left handed shhoter friendly. The safety is hard to disengage for a left handed shooter and the Remington shotgun is very costly to have a left hand safety installed. It has to be fitted with a left handed receiver to complete this. Other manufacturers such as Mossberg, Winchester and Ithaca are very easy to have left hand safeties installed. I know there was talk of allowing personal owned 12 gauge shotguns to be able to be deployed and carried if qualified, but all of a sudden the matter disappeared and nothing further was ever discussed. I have qualified with the Remington for years, but for use the department owned ones are not suitable for their purpose. As far as the Benelli autoloaders, I think they are less dependable and durable than the pump action shotguns. It would be a great step forward if the members could carry their own pump shotguns with 18 inch barrels, suited for them. This way the safeties for left handed shooters would not be a issue and a personal owned shotgun could be installed with an adjustible stock or the stock cut down to the individuals size. 2 important issues for safety, handling and comfort. I know you have stated in the past you are a fan of the shotgun, so could you please consider ressurecting this policy and hopefully implementing it. Even many of our range instrustors use personal owned pump shotguns while training. It would be nice to have another tool to work with if someone is comfortable personally in its use. Thank you. I hope you consider this. We are moving forward with the tools we have, but it would be nice to have even more of a selection, if possible. Thank you again.

Posted on September 28, 2010 at 06:06 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I will discuss this with the firearms personnel.  Based upon my expereince and every study I have read, the .223 round is very effective indoors, and for use in close quarter battle.  So, I will leave this door open, but I would like to see us move to an era of rifles.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 02:15 PM CDT #


Dear Superintendent,
I have a question that maybe you can answer. When the department was going through TARA training, personnel were issued the Avon Gas Masks. I attended last year and our class and numerous other classes were never issued masks. I receved the inserts for my eye prescription over a year ago, but still no masks have been issued to many members. Now TARA has the 1 day session, which is not available to those who have not been issued the Avon Respirator. In these days and times it seems a little backwards that the masks are still not available to those who have not received them. I have spoken to many different people in many of our different bureaus and the answer is always the same. No one knows or has any information. In a city our size with the threats always there, is there anyone who has a clue why thse have not been ordered, received and issued. After over a year this seems a little ridiculous. As I said, the reason I am posting this question, is no one anywhere has an answer one way or another.

Posted on September 28, 2010 at 06:18 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I don't have an answer, but I will get you one.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 02:03 PM CDT #


Sir have you recieved a response from Commander Lewin? Thank you

Have you considered allowing detectives access to the CPD databases from smart devices while in the field?. We don't have access to sign out PDT's. Having access to Clear and Chris would be extremely helpful while out in the field.
Posted on May 30, 2010 at 05:18 PM CDT #

Superintendent's Response
I asked Commander Lewin to look into this. JW

Posted on June 07, 2010 at 09:45 AM CDT #





Posted on September 29, 2010 at 08:45 PM CDT #


SIR, NONE OF THE TACT TEAMS HAVE BEEN TRAINED WITH THE TASER,THEY JUST WANT TO TRAIN OFFICERS ON THE WATCH.I THINK IT IS A GREAT TOOL AND ANY OFFICER WORKING THE STREET SHOULD BE TRAINED WITH ONE AND EQUIPED WITH ONE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

Posted on September 30, 2010 at 07:40 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This doesn't make sense to me.  I will inquire with the Training Academy and get back to you.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:58 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Spoke to DS Brust.  He advised that they scheduled districts for training and no one showed up.  He is going to put up three more classes.  i asked him to advertise these and ensure TACT is invited.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 02:18 PM CDT #


Sir, about five years ago we were promised to receive exercise equipment for our gym in the 014 dist. station and no equipment was delivered. Any chance we can receive a couple of exercise machines?

Posted on September 30, 2010 at 01:12 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Highly unlikely.  There are limited funds available for operational needs.  Do you live nearby other districts or the Academy that would satisfy your workout needs?  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:56 PM CDT #


Hello Superintendant,
I would like to suggest that instead of sending out the payroll stubs, for those with Direct deposit. The stubs should be available on-line through the clear or e-learning sites. This would save a lot of paper. Most members don't pick up their stubs. This way if they do need it for refinancing or credit they can print up what they need.

Posted on October 02, 2010 at 09:49 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

This idea has been discussed before, and it's a great idea.  However, the CPD does not produce the payroll stubbs; that is handled by the Comptroller"s Office.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:54 PM CDT #


Boss, there was once a time when we knew who our leaders were. The photos were posted in offices and on their web pages. We could see their and their photos as well. One of the many problems we have now is poor management familiarity. Too many department members don't know who is in their chain of command. I go to some web pages to find out who the Commanders, lieutenants or Sergeants are or, who is responsible for certain information but can find nothing. To have a disciplined and motivated workforce, we have to know who is in charge and where our orders will come from. Unfortunately we don't have that now; we have too many bosses trying to micro-manage down too many levels. We have to let supervisors manage at their level and either re-train or re-assign them if they can't do their job. A Deputy Superintendant should not be on ANY scene managing troops where there is a Commander, lieutenant or Sergeant present. As a ranking Supervisor, your job is to ensure your subordinates understand what you want to accomplish and let them command their troops. Your job as the ranking Supervisor is to let them know that you are supporting them and give them words of encouragement. Please have all units post at least the names of key personnel in the unit and establish a working chain of command where our leaders aren't spending time micro-managing or run everyone else's unit trying to impress their boss.

Posted on October 02, 2010 at 11:10 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

You have identified far greater issues than not having the various chain of commands identified.  We can certainly address your issue, and I will address the larger issue at the command staff meeting in the near future.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:51 PM CDT #


Dear Sir- As a patrolmen working in a beat car I have noticed that nearly every time the PDT is removed from the vehicle mount to complete a report, the computer shuts down for no apparent reason. When this happens, data is lost and additional time is wasted rebooting the computer and completing the report. This happens even when the battery display is reading upwards of 90% power. It is very difficult to type when the computer is in the mount and I believe the idea behind the design is so officers can bring the PDT to the victim for data entry. I think this leads to officers relocating to the station to complete reports. In essence the pdt failer to function as designed leads to wasted time and keeps officers out of service. Thanks for your attention.

Posted on October 02, 2010 at 09:17 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I am not aware of the design of the PDT in terms of taking the terminal to the victim.  I passed this information to CDR Lewin for review.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:47 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I spoke to CDR Lewin.  He offered the following advice:  Based on the information in the comment, it's difficult to diagnose what the problem might be but it seems likely that the PDT battery is either dead/ not charging properly or is missing. AIRA is designed so that even in the case of power or network connectivity loss, reports-- even those not yet submitted- are still stored locally for later retrieval, so no report data should never be lost. The Help Desk can walk the user through the data retrieval process should it become necessary, and instructions can also be found on the CPD Intranet home page (click the link Help Documentation and select Automated Incident Reporting).


 

It's critical that users immediately call these problems in to the Help Desk at 312-744-DATA so that we can troubleshoot the issue-- which may result in replacing the PDT battery. If the officer in this instance will provide his or her contact information, I will ensure that someone follows up personally.


Posted on October 06, 2010 at 04:55 PM CDT #


Superintendent,
I recently attended a DUI seminar. It began with a profound video from U-Tube entitled, "Everybody Hurts - 20th Anniversary (2009)" from the Australian Transport Accident Commission. If you have time, I highly recommend that you view it (5 mins). I am recommending it for our interdepartmental streaming video as a reminder to our members to not drink and drive. Thank you and stay safe.

Posted on October 04, 2010 at 10:34 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Thank you for the lead.  I will review this as soon as I can.  JW



Posted on October 06, 2010 at 01:43 PM CDT #


Sir,

I keep on hearing the same rumor about Airport Law Enforcement being bulked up with X amount of officers. I have also heard that the current head of the Department of Aviation has a wife who is a Caps sgt in 011. The current rumor is that she will get a Sgt's spot at O'Hare. Myself and a good amount of other sergeants have more time in grade than this person has on the job. I certainly hope that any sergeants openings are put to bid. You keep on saying that you have made things transparent. I don't see it. Look at the requirements for the open OCD sergeant's spots. Those requirements appear to have been written to give the new sergeants who just got promoted out of OCD to get right back in. You have called out sergeants to be leaders. I am asking you to be a leader, and get rid of the favoritism and cronyism that is used to fill units.

Signed,

not related to any exempt and no phone call to boot..........

Posted on October 05, 2010 at 05:12 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Sometimes time in grade is not the sole qualifying factor.  Knowledge, Skills, and Ability sometimes count for something.  This department is more transparent than it has ever been.  Some of the selections have been emulated by other departments because of their "fairness."  If someone isn't selected, it is easier to blame the system than to look in the mirror.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 02:59 PM CST #


Sir, someone asked you about why the incumbent sergeants were not allowed to bid prior to the new sergeants coming out and your answer was that they were assigned based on departmental needs. That does not answer the question. Departmental needs would have been addressed either way. Whats the difference if the new sergeants were allowed to move first?

Posted on October 06, 2010 at 04:13 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Feel free to discuss this with DS Brown, or ASO Jackson.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 03:01 PM CST #


Superintendent,

Relative to a previous post, I also attended TARA training and was fitted for an Avon Gas Mask. As of today, I have been waiting approximately one year for a gas mask to be issued.
With no further explanation of the importance of this equipment required, I believe that I, as well as what I suspect to be every officer who attended TARA training after me, remains without it. In effect, an entire year of trained officers are not currently equipped to respond to an incident where this equipment would be required to effectively do our jobs. Yet, this status persists despite the investment made by the Department in providing a week of training to be able to do so.

As a secondary issue to safety, as this equipment is required to comply with attending the TARA In Service Training Program, this same number of officers is unable to comply with the AMFN directive to attend this training and complete it by the end of the year. I have inquired through all available command channels to no avail as to when I will be issued this mask. I have been told that an order was placed for the acquisition of this equipment, but it has not yet arrived. I received this information six months ago. Please help with this situation. I appreciate your time and attention.

Posted on October 06, 2010 at 04:53 PM CDT #


dear superintendent, a easy way for the city to save some money on the next test for police, they should give the power thest first then the written test

Posted on October 08, 2010 at 03:07 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The Department of Human Resources is responsible for all of the protocols involving the test.  The written test is the first part of the process.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 03:03 PM CST #


Sir,
We made a felony arrest that was captured on in car video but were unable to get assistance at time of arrest. We were told that the arrest was not a critical incident. Notification of incident went out via email. This is evidence that is needed for court!!!!!!! This flaw in service needs to be addressed. All felonies should be critical. help desk ticket #2657012.

Posted on October 08, 2010 at 06:34 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The BAS will look into this.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 03:05 PM CST #


While it is nice to see new, sharp looking uniform items being approved I am wondering why the fleece is only approved with the embroidered patches? I happen to be 'old school'. I like my real star and real name tag.
Not to mention this adds 44% to the price.


Posted on October 09, 2010 at 06:43 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Then don't buy the fleece.  We have far too many uniform options right now.  We are not adding another.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 02:54 PM CST #


Have YOU personally tried to change a tire on the new Tahoe's? Especially wearing uniform clothes? You have to crawl halfway under to get the tire out and put the jack in the proper place. I can't imagine trying to do this in the winter. Why is it Fleet cannot perform this service?

Posted on October 09, 2010 at 06:47 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Can't say that I have.  No vehicle is perfect.  I will try to secure an answer for you from Fleet.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 02:53 PM CST #


Sir, any word on the status of the polo shirts option for the D-Unit? I would like to see the department get away form the shirt and tie while we are doing field investigations. As you know the crime scenes and some of the places we need to question people aren't the nicest, it would be nice to have the polo shirt as an option. The tie and sport coat still has a place in court, but not on the steets, not where I work. Most departments already have this option for thier Detectives. Last vote showed over 80% of officer would like this option. Please make this change happen it will not cost the city any money, and the troops will appreciate it. Thank You.

Posted on October 12, 2010 at 01:13 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Not going to happen.  The management of BIS indicated they want detectives in shirt and tie.  I am not going to overrule them on this.  Sorry, I liked the idea too.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 02:51 PM CST #


What ever happened to the Presidential Deployment and Crime Reduction Award?

Posted on October 12, 2010 at 12:32 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Those are being disseminated at this time.  JW



Posted on December 02, 2010 at 02:47 PM CST #


Superintendent,

I know there are more important things to worry about, but last December I inquired about the department recognizing the Mayoral Resolution Award and giving the officers a ribbon for it. You replied by stated "we are moving forward with this". It has been just over 10 months now and I still haven't heard or seen anything about it. I was wondering do you know anything more or has this issued died.


Posted on October 12, 2010 at 01:27 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

It died.  I will try to revive it.  JW



Posted on November 30, 2010 at 03:08 PM CST #


how many tactical officers are the district commanders allowed to have in each district and should it be allowed for a district to have more officers on tact than on any given watch?

Posted on October 12, 2010 at 09:47 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

The Bureau of Patrol is looking at resource allocation for all of Patrol.  This will include Tact.  JW



Posted on November 30, 2010 at 03:07 PM CST #


Superintendant,
When will the Dept. promote another Lt.s class?

Posted on October 13, 2010 at 10:15 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

Unknown at tis time.  Recent discussions have suggested after the first of the year for all promotions.  We recognize the need for more LTs and we will continue discussions with the Budget  Office to see when this can be done.  JW



Posted on November 30, 2010 at 02:49 PM CST #


What is your opinion on altering or eliminating the mandatory retirement age of 63?

Posted on September 22, 2010 at 11:08 AM CDT

Posted on October 13, 2010 at 11:11 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I'd have to look at best practices throughout the country.  I do feel it is important for our employees to have the physical ability to perform those requirements of a police officer, which exceed those of many other professions.  JW



Posted on November 30, 2010 at 03:02 PM CST #


Questions of when Detectives, Sagreants, L.T.'s are going to be promoted have been asked probably dozens of times on the blog. Unfortunately department members (including myself) do not know the procedure in which you and you're office request promotion approval. So my question is... Can you please explain the steps taken when you request promotion approval.
Such as... is a request formally submitted? to whom? who votes on it? who ultimately decides on it? etc. I think it would clear up alot of confusion.

Posted on October 15, 2010 at 02:34 AM CDT #


Superintendent,
I beleive that one way your administration can boost the moral of our organization, would be to remove the CAPS logo that is displayed on marked police vehicles and replace then all with a Chicago Police Star Decal that was so historically, honorably and proudly viewed by officers as they began their tour of duty each and every day.
Now that the CAPS program is being dramatically reduced, the time is right to demonstrate to the men and women of the Chicago Police Department that our past generations of officers as well as current officers will again be proud that we are the CPD.

Thank You, Mike Lappe 016/124

Posted on October 15, 2010 at 02:50 PM CDT #


Dear Mr Superintendant, any word yet on if or when they will have a detective promotion class this year and how many will be promoted ? Any information will be appreciated, thanks !

Posted on October 16, 2010 at 05:02 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I have been pushing for this for the past 12 months.  I will enter 2011 with renewed optimism for this to happen.  We need more detectives - period.  JW



Posted on December 29, 2010 at 11:07 AM CST #


Superintendent Weis:

As you know, the Department has installed anti-bacterial dispensers throughout many of its facilities. However, anti-bacterial dispensers are absent from Headquarters and the second floor gym.

After using the gym for the first time last week, I was dismayed at the lack of anti-bacterial agents made available for members to wipe down the fitness equipment. The only item made available to Department members was glass cleaner. The installation of anti-bacterial dispensers throughout Headquarters and the second floor gym would greatly assist Department members in maintaining and cleaning the fitness equipment.

Please recommend that the Bureau of Administrative Services installa anti-bacterial dispensers throughout Headquarters and the second floor gym?

Thank you.


Posted on October 18, 2010 at 03:19 PM CDT #


Would it be possible to get ANY consistancy with where to sign up/find out information about training the department is offering?
An officer was inquiring about 2 different trainings he signed up for. 1 was shotgun, the other 3.5 hr firearms.

I attempted to look up the shotgun training on e-learning. Six different classes, none of them the one he signed up for. S.O. 10-08 says nothing about times or locations. Turns out this training was sent out via FAX message. No sign up thru e-learning.

I then tried to look up the 3.5 hour training. The available S.O. was from 2009, does no good. This training was assigned to the districts thru a B.O.P.
Although the training was on e-learning, because his training was today, and could no longer be signed up for, no information on times/locations was available on e-learning.

Outdated special orders, Matrixes being sent out by FAX, BOP or whatever.

The paperless department is also the informationless department.

Try calling the academy... press 1 for asst. dep. sup. office, press 2 for duty desk, press 3 for security desk. press star for a directory of personnel. NO option for talking to someone about training being offered.

Posted on October 19, 2010 at 06:57 AM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

In speaking with the range, I learned that shotgun was never offered in e-learning this year.  A matrix was used so that District Commanders could assign only those officers who would actually be issued a shotgun.  This eliminated wasted hours off the street for those officers that would never utilize the weapon.  Also, we are attempting to keep GO and SO vague regarding training locations, dates, and times in an effort to not use resources amending GO's for simple things like a change in range location.


The 3.5 was offered in BOTH a matrix (for Patrol) and in e-learning for anyone who was not assigned via the matrix.  This was done to offer options.  I admit it could confuse the uninitiated, but the range wanted to offer these programs to all officers, not just those assigned to the BOP.


FYI, all of the six ranges' direct numbers are published.  JW



Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM CST #


"All overshirt vest carriers purchased after 18 October 2010 must be constructed from black nylon only. Blue, white, and leather are no longer approved"

Why are the colors that match our shirt colors not approved anymore? I really am not interested in wearing anything BLACK as an outer garment on a 95 degree day.

Posted on October 19, 2010 at 12:33 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response

I think the word uniform suggests uniformity.  We have to start somewhere.  Plus, we don't have that many 95 degree days - it's not Florida.  JW



Posted on December 29, 2010 at 11:10 AM CST #


MOLLE carriers must have the embroidered star and patches.

I asked this question about the fleece; what's wrong with using our department issued stars?

Posted on October 19, 2010 at 12:35 PM CDT #


Hello, I am responding to your response to the comment posted on 27 Sept 2010. I am assuming it was a sergeant who posted it, because of the nature of the comment. The sergeant asked about why the incumbent sergeants did not get a chance to bid, before the new sergeants were assigned to districts. Your answer was that they were assigned based on departmental needs. I usually do not challenge a response from a superior, but this response was insufficient. I have over 10 years as a sergeant; one of the things I depend on is seniority. That is all we, on this Department, really have left. Incumbent sergeants look forward to a new class coming out, knowing we will have a chance to bid somewhere else. As a sergeant and above, it becomes much harder to go anywhere, since there are fewer positions. Opening up vacancies for sergeants would have filled Departmental needs, and the new sergeants would have then been filled in the spots left. It is a slap in the face to incumbent sergeants, by taking new sergeants and placing them in districts, incumbent sergeants might have wanted. This was a real slap in the face of hard working sergeants who might have wanted to move to a district a little closer to home, or maybe just needed a change.

Posted on October 21, 2010 at 10:05 PM CDT #


Superintendent Weis~
I would like to thank the Department for coordinating the Wills for Heroes program. I recently attended this event and left with a notarized copy of a will, a medical power of attorney and a property power of attorney. My final wishes are now in writing, thereby alleviating guesswork on the part of my family.
Many thanks to whomever was responsible for bringing this valuable and much-needed event to our Department.

Lt. Eve M. Gushes, District 007

Posted on October 26, 2010 at 07:22 AM CDT #


I have sent numerous e-mails concerning enrollment in the 1-day semiautomatic transition course. In May/June of this year I enrolled in a 1-day semiautomatic transition course and for whatever reason my watch commander was unable to approve it. The program does not allow me to enroll in a new course even though the original course date has passed.I have since attempted to withdraw from the course to no avail. The watch commander cannot approve or dissaprove the request. When I attempt to enroll in a new 1-day semiautomatic transition course the computer tells me that I am awaiting approval and will not allow me to enroll in the course. I have sent numerous emails to "elearning" without the problem being fixed and no acknowledgement of my request. Can something please be done. I purchased and registered a striker fire handgun over six months ago and have not been able to use it due to this issue not being resolved. my pc# is pc0s598.


Posted on October 26, 2010 at 11:50 PM CDT #


Superintendent's Response
  • This issue was resolved. It was an E-learning glitch (“I don’t know what the program does but I had to make the course active, manually withdraw him from the course and then put the course back into completed status”). Officers are encouraged to contact the Range(s) directly, or contact 4-DATA for issues with E learning.


  • Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:24 AM CST #


    Superintendant, I would like to have you expand on your comments about the auxilary police person's being used for officer's after the now mandatory age of retirment, 63?

    I understand that you are proposing involvement of officer's 63age and older to aux police?

    I am interested, R. Fiorito, 11624 from 023

    Posted on October 27, 2010 at 01:59 AM CDT #


    Superintendent,

    Any word on when there may be another sgts class?
    Thank you

    Posted on October 27, 2010 at 07:12 PM CDT #


    Dear Sir.....how or where can one attain the official list of approved uniform items............IE holster types, new accessories , optional gear etc? Thank you in advance for your time.

    Posted on October 28, 2010 at 11:16 PM CDT #


    Hello Superintendent,
    My understanding is that short of having military experience, an applicant taking the police exam must be 25 years of age before 26 November.

    Understanding that there are so many 24year olds that could enhance the pool of applicants, why not keep the 25 years old minimum age, but require that the applicant reach their 25th birthday on or before their date of hire.

    This would make it possible for many more people to take the test, and still meet the age limit requirements.

    Posted on October 30, 2010 at 04:18 AM CDT #


    The retirement age is State Law

    Posted on November 03, 2010 at 05:36 AM CDT #


    Superintendent,
    I regularly use the fitness center at the training academy to workout and stay in shape. Several pieces of equipment have been in a state of disrepair for several months with a note attached "Out of Order". It would be greatly appreciated if the equipment could be repaired. Also, it would be great if some additional and different leg machines could be added for strength training. I'm sure alot of us would be willing to get a collection together to add/fix machines. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Posted on November 04, 2010 at 12:07 AM CDT #


    Superintendent's Response
  • There are currently two units down and as I am sure you are aware, there is no contract in place to repair fitness equipment. It’s close but not there yet. JW


  • Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:25 AM CST #


    would cutting the tact teams to 8 people from 10 help man power?

    Posted on November 05, 2010 at 03:23 AM CDT #


    Dear Santa here is the Detective Division wish list:

    1) Computers in the Area which can view video from the various video formats, including our own P.O.D. videos.

    2) LEADS 2000 access for all detectives, and patrolmen too. We still don't have access to something that was released 10 years ago. It is free of charge from the Illinois State Police. Google it. Add in Accurint if you really think we were good this year.

    3) Witness interview rooms and waiting area to entertain them (bathroom, phone, magazines, newspaper, tv, etc.) while we jump through hoops for felony review. Especially since we are getting sued for holding them hostage in the pursuit of justice.

    4) A working heating and cooling system in Area One. The air conditioners were great until one day they disappeared. Maybe they were stolen.


    One more thing Santa. Be careful if you use the south doorway. The raccoons who hold us hostage there at night are a mean bunch.

    Posted on November 05, 2010 at 12:31 PM CDT #


    Superintendent,

    Is there any way to explore the issuance of new stars? The current issued star is very poor quality and loses letters and numbers constantly , leaving officers looking very unprofessional.

    Thank you in advance.

    Posted on November 07, 2010 at 06:26 PM CST #


    Supt.
    Can you at least tell us the number of Lt. promotions scheduled in next years budget...Please????

    Posted on November 12, 2010 at 02:45 PM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    The promotional plan for LTs has not been developed for 2011.  I will continue to push for this as mid-level management is critical to our success.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM CST #


    Superintendent,

    The Department has many data analysis efforts, including the recently created Predictive Analytics Group, and has relationships with a number of academic institutions to foster good analysis. How about opening the data up for the general public? This is being done in a number of places. The city of London has started doing this recently, publishing a wide variety of data as easy to use comma separated value files (http://data.london.gov.uk/). As a result people have started creating their own mashup applications utilizing the data (http://data.london.gov.uk/datastore/inspirational-uses). A recent article details efforts in New York (http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/11/ff_311_new_york/all/1).

    ClearMap has given birth to at least one third party application (http://chicago.everyblock.com/crime/). ClearMap's format, however, discourages general use of the data. The ClearMap data is only available for a certain block of dates at any given time.

    As someone who went through the process of obtaining Department data for academic use, I know that it does take time for such a request, and that each request has to be filled by someone from R&D. The current CPD 'Guidelines Relating to Statistical and Crime Data Requests' published on ClearPath state that filling a request can take from 30 to 90 days for a routine request, and up to six months for a request that would require a 'Non-Disclosure Agreement.'

    While there are obstacles to releasing this data (privacy concerns, etc.) they can be overcome through automated redaction , as is the case in ClearMap. By freeing this data we can encourage the community as a whole to contribute to crime analysis. By taking advantage of crowdsourcing we may be made aware of trends in crime that would otherwise remain unseen. The analysis might come from the academic community, or just from interested citizens.

    We should also publish this data for a more altruistic reason: it's the right thing to do. This information was paid for by the residents of the City of Chicago, and they should have free access to it.

    Det. John Benigno



    Posted on November 14, 2010 at 01:54 AM CST #


    I recently received a notification about a News Affairs Newsletter. I was wondering if the actions of police officers in the newsletter make the general media. We know what we do everyday, the general public doesn't.

    Posted on November 23, 2010 at 08:36 AM CST #


    Dear Superintendant,

    I am a member of the SWAT team. After yesterday's terrible events on the 8100 block of Burnham, a question arose with in our group. Why do we not have K-9 capabilities, in a SWAT capacity? We were tasked with the clearing of multiple abandoned houses on the block the incident occured, along with many others in the surrounding neighborhood. It is my belief that with K-9's and their handlers trained in our tactics, those searches could have been handled quicker, more direct in our search, and in a much safer manner for our officers. While clearing houses yesterday, we could not bring K-9 in with us because of the difference in training and operation. On top of that, once we had cleared the house and asked if K-9 could do a back clear, they were more than willing to do so but brought it to our attention that the house was now contaminated by our scent and the efforts would be futile. I was recently in a WMD class put on by an impressive group of instructors from the LSU program. I spoke to a retired Sgt. Major of Delta, who is now a Sgt. for the Reno PD in Nevada, along with a few more instructors who also carry impressive resume's. My question was " are K-9 used regularly over sea's to clear buildings?" the answer was definitley. He had seen K-9 used in an extreamley manner. The conversation quickly turned to the domestic side, and it was said that K-9 use in regards to SWAT teams is a regular practice country wide. We have current K-9 officers who are former SWAT operators. It sounds terrible to say, but a dogs life is not worth as much as the life of an officer. The dogs would help us locate offenders more efficiently, and have a great psychological effect on offenders.I will be bringing this to the attention of my immediate supervisors, but I was hoping this could expidite the cause. You have been very good to the SWAT team at trying to catch us up with the rest of the nation in regards to equipment and tactics. This would be another step in the right direction, and the future of the SWAT team. What are you thoughts on the subject Sir?

    Sincerly,
    SWAT


    Posted on November 27, 2010 at 08:06 AM CST #


    What ever happened to the possibility of allowing Detectives to wear polo shirts?

    Posted on December 02, 2010 at 11:56 AM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    As long as Steve Peterson is over BIS, this will not happen.  I try to delegate as much of the decisions to the DSs as possible.  I am not going to overrule Steve on attire for detectives.  No one likes to dress down more than me, but image is important, and I sepnt 23 years in an organization where suit and tie were the norm.  Sorry - you'll have to wait for a new DS if you want to wear a polo shirt.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 11:01 AM CST #


    Superintendent,
    While at Officer Flisk's Funeral at the star of the procession I heard the call PH1 stating he was having control problems and was going to try to get to base. Thankfully they made it safe. My comment is during one of the last Police Funeral's we had, they asked for permission to do a flyover to show their respect and say a final goodbye. They were denied. I would hope that they be allowed to do this in the future. They have helped us at many scenes and have always been there at our worst times, as they were Friday for Officer Flisk at the scene and during the procession to the morgue. Everyone from every unit is allowed to pay their final respects expect for the guys watching over us from above. Hope you could take this into consideration. I think it would be a very appropriate show of respect at the end of these long emotional days.


    Posted on December 02, 2010 at 04:49 PM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    I think the flyover is a terrific show of respect and would want this in all of our funerals.  I recall that it was rather windy that day, so perhaps it was a weather related decision.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM CST #


    Glad to see the ET's working 99 is being addressed. Instead of using beat cars why not assign a K9 unit if one is available? That would bring twice the protection without drawing from district resources. I understand K9 isn't always available but its just a thought. If a K9 needs to go to another job then a district car could be assigned, but for the most part K9 jobs aren't an extreme emergency. Right now ET's and K9's are requested using different Citywides, but that could be easily changed.

    Some of your moves over the past three years have been well scrutinized, but you have always been on the side of officer safety, whether it be better equipment, training, increased police in high crime areas, etc.



    Posted on December 04, 2010 at 09:54 PM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    Certainly worth looking into.  I sent your message to DS Ernie Brown.  He is always looking at new and innovative ideas to impove how we do business.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:54 AM CST #


    As a district Sergeant I wanted to make you aware that the computer systems we use daily in the field have been giving us trouble for some time now. The PCAD system which is the lifeblood for supervisors had been sporadically down for some time. I've brought this to attention of the dispatchers and they have responded that they are aware of the situation and have passed it on to be corrected.
    Also the AIRA system has been going down more frequently. Often times cars have to relocate to the district to complete reports. This is a waste of time, especially when we are critically short on manpower. Today for example I am unable to log in to approve reports both in the vehicle and at the station. While I do not expect the computer system to be without occasional disruptions, the frequency and duration of the times that the systems are down is something that someone should look into and correct.

    Posted on December 06, 2010 at 11:28 AM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    Contact Commander Lewin and discuss this with him. He is our POC at OEMC for Public Safety IT.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:51 AM CST #


    Superintendant, I have been detailed to unit 143 since being put on limited duty I.O.D. (June 2009), I have since been released back to full duty and have made a written request to be sent back to my unit of assignment (017), that request was made on 24 November 2010 through my chain of command in unit 143, and I have not been able to go back to 017 as of todays date. As we are very short on the streets I do not understand why I am being held hostage in this unit when I can work the street again. Thank You for your time.

    Officer Scott S. Oldham #19461


    Posted on December 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    Scott - thank you for identifying yourself so I can get back to you.  I have directed COS Mike Masters to look into your situation and speak to you privately regarding it.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM CST #


    Dear Superintendent:

    I work at the Headquarters, M-F, weekends and holidays off. I am very greatful for my job, however, I was sick and I used all my COMP time in between medical time. I am a mother of young daughters, and I miss all my girls' school events, and I cannot take them to the doctor when they get sick, because I have no time due to take, and with just 7-8 days (personal and Bf, there are not enough days to take off through the year. I also have some personal business to attend, such as going to the doctor for tests, which I am not able to attend because I don't have time off to take. I would like to ask you, are we ever going to have 4/2 or 10 hour day? Please advise. Thank you very much and Happy Holidays to you and your family.

    Posted on December 13, 2010 at 03:12 PM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    The overall answer is no; however, those units that are operational at HQ could be considered for an alternative work schedule.  I suggest you discuss this with General Counsel Deb Kirby.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM CST #


    Is there any way that supervisors can be granted access to detective supp reports? It would be extremely helpful in processing awards.

    Posted on December 18, 2010 at 11:46 PM CST #


    In reference to AMFN 164126 "Firearm/Taser...Notification"
    Isn't it a repeat of efforts that the CPIC is notified and they notify IPRA, but the WC still has to notify IPRA for the log number. Since it is not an allegation of misconduct, can't the CPIC just get the log number when they make their notification and forward that to the WC in-box or e-mail.

    Posted on December 21, 2010 at 08:14 AM CST #


    Dear Supt,
    Any idea as to when there might be another sergeants class? Will there be another class made off the current list? So far not even 150 have been promoted off the list. Thanks

    Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:12 PM CST #


    Superintendent's Response

    Spoke to DS Peterson.  He wants to maintain the integrity of these reports within the Detective Division.  However, he suggested that you contact a Detective Sergeant to provide you with the facts you need for the purpose of submitting awards.  JW



    Posted on December 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM CST #


    Supt.,
    Are there plans to move or detail Tactical Officers from any districts in the city? The rumors of Tactical reallignment in "slower" districts have been rampent for quite a while. I was wondering if there was any truth to them. If there is reassignment occuring, ample notice
    to the officers would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank You for the opportunity to speak to you via your blog

    Posted on January 03, 2011 at 02:18 PM CST #


    I have received e-mails about the Supt's appearances on radio and television broadcasts. Due to work conflicts I can't "tune-in" to these programs, does News Affairs provide transcripts of the interviews?

    Posted on January 04, 2011 at 07:42 AM CST #


    Superintendent.... I work in public Transportation 701/702 and was wondering if and when personel in this unit would be allowed to train for the carbine program. More than a few in the unit are interested and would love the opportunity. You would think with public transportation being a favorite target in the world as we know it today, our unit would be the perfect canidates for this.

    Posted on January 05, 2011 at 08:47 AM CST #


    I would like to use this forum to thank the Officers of the 16th District for an outstanding job during the blizzard of 02 February. At oh dark thirty, right in the middle of the worst of the storm, I was unable to get my car out of the garage and I started walking to the nearest bus stop. A car from the 16th District stopped and offered me a lift. Once at work, stories kept coming in from others who were given the same courtesy. You all did a wonderful job and are a credit to the Department.

    Posted on February 02, 2011 at 07:02 PM CST #


    NOTE: PC numbers and names will not be posted unless made part of your comment. Anonymous comments are not being linked or tracked by PC numbers.

    Login




    Feeds